There is a factual basis for parts of what you’ve read about Zohran Mamdani, but the claim of a deliberate campaign to bankrupt landlords goes beyond what the evidence establishes.
His administration has explicitly supported:
Tenant organizing and stronger complaints enforcement. Mamdani has also proposed expanding the types of housing violations that justify rent strikes.
Transferring chronically neglected buildings to different owners, including nonprofits, community land trusts, or tenants themselves. These are stated objectives of his “Fix the City” initiative.
And there is a broader ownership agenda: his tenant-protection director, Cea Weaver, has advocated city purchases of rent-stabilized buildings and a growing publicly owned housing portfolio. So the concern about movement toward public ownership is not invented.
What I could not verify is an official instruction to manufacture complaints or indiscriminately stop paying rent in order to bankrupt otherwise responsible landlords. A recent New York Post opinion piece presents essentially the sequence you describe, but its claim of deliberate bankruptcy engineering is an interpretation of the administration’s motives.
Also, a management takeover and an ownership transfer are different things. Under the existing Article 7A program, a court can appoint an administrator to collect rents and repair dangerous conditions in a privately owned building. That does not itself make the city the owner.
Could aggressive enforcement combined with lost rental income push financially vulnerable landlords toward insolvency? Yes, that is a plausible economic risk. Whether that happens, and whether it is an intended outcome, are separate questions.
“First wave of communism” is therefore too strong a conclusion. An effort to expand public and nonprofit ownership of rental housing is a more precise description. The crucial issue is whether enforcement remedies documented neglect through fair procedures—or is used to make responsible private ownership financially untenable. The policies warrant scrutiny; the latter accusation still requires evidence.
His administration has explicitly supported:
Tenant organizing and stronger complaints enforcement. Mamdani has also proposed expanding the types of housing violations that justify rent strikes.
Transferring chronically neglected buildings to different owners, including nonprofits, community land trusts, or tenants themselves. These are stated objectives of his “Fix the City” initiative.
And there is a broader ownership agenda: his tenant-protection director, Cea Weaver, has advocated city purchases of rent-stabilized buildings and a growing publicly owned housing portfolio. So the concern about movement toward public ownership is not invented.
What I could not verify is an official instruction to manufacture complaints or indiscriminately stop paying rent in order to bankrupt otherwise responsible landlords. A recent New York Post opinion piece presents essentially the sequence you describe, but its claim of deliberate bankruptcy engineering is an interpretation of the administration’s motives.
Also, a management takeover and an ownership transfer are different things. Under the existing Article 7A program, a court can appoint an administrator to collect rents and repair dangerous conditions in a privately owned building. That does not itself make the city the owner.
Could aggressive enforcement combined with lost rental income push financially vulnerable landlords toward insolvency? Yes, that is a plausible economic risk. Whether that happens, and whether it is an intended outcome, are separate questions.
“First wave of communism” is therefore too strong a conclusion. An effort to expand public and nonprofit ownership of rental housing is a more precise description. The crucial issue is whether enforcement remedies documented neglect through fair procedures—or is used to make responsible private ownership financially untenable. The policies warrant scrutiny; the latter accusation still requires evidence.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
I've seen government run housing. Its beautful. the best. 😃
View 5 more replies »
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
@ReptilianFromPlanetCrush It supplies a demand and basic human need where the private sector has failed . . . and it does this largely without the advantage of profit and capital gain. If you think you can do better, fill your boots!
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
Next stop. Fix the bankruptcy laws so that rich people cant walk away leaving everyone else broke and stay rich themselves. (Yes. I do have someone in mind.)😷
RachelLia2003 · 22-25, F
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@RachelLia2003 Exactly. Built a bridge and get over it..😷
RachelLia2003 · 22-25, F
@whowasthatmaskedman
its a lydian era bridge 2500yr. built as an aqueduct then used as bridge. later they added those metal fences so yea
its a lydian era bridge 2500yr. built as an aqueduct then used as bridge. later they added those metal fences so yea
Elessar · 31-35, M
I've heard Mamdani would cause the apocalypse since before he was elected and thus far I have seen only improvements to the life of NYCers
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@Elessar I think you missed the point, that for Republicans, things improving for the ordinary working folk IS the Apocalypse,,😷
Elessar · 31-35, M
@whowasthatmaskedman True that
Waveney · M
No, the landlords need to learn to not be so greedy.
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
Best way to avoid tenants complaining is to maintain your property well and provide a decent level of service for the eyewateringly high rent.
Greenthumb · 56-60, M
@SunshineGirl Mandamis people are telling tenants to complain about everything from dim lights to noise. Do you want to bet that Mandami is doing this in order to take over properties?
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
@Greenthumb No, I think his administration's stated objective is far more plausible. The balance of power in high rent locations such as New York is overwhelmingly in favour of the landlord. Mamdani has a democratic mandate to support tenants' rights and he is doing that. If a landlord cannot afford to maintain a rental property to a minimum standard, they should not be in the business. They are benefiting no one.
Rolexeo · 31-35, M
I hope so
Greenthumb · 56-60, M
@Rolexeo Yes, government run housing will be much better.👍
Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
If they can't afford to maintain their properties, maybe they should sell to someone who isn't that broke or greedy.
Greenthumb · 56-60, M
@Crazywaterspring who would be foolish enough to buy them?
TexChik · F
I don't think the fed will allow that. He is getting serious push back from the people. The Governor is wearing Hijab and releasing violent felons from prison...Guess she is going scorched earth.
Mandami's city can't take over anything, they are broke because they ran out of other people's money and chased out billions from the City and State...
Mandami's city can't take over anything, they are broke because they ran out of other people's money and chased out billions from the City and State...
@TexChik 💯
Frostcloud · F
mamdani ❤
Frostcloud · F
@Frostcloud uh oh someone's upset i spelled his name correctly
RachelLia2003 · 22-25, F
its just the begining. new york is the newest islamic state
RachelLia2003 · 22-25, F
@Greenthumb he is italien. he doesnt know stuff about the holy land of america. he is commonist too
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Elessar · 31-35, M
@RachelLia2003 America is literally named after a guy from my country lmao, it's purely thanks to us if it exists in its current denomination. Literally means "land of Amerigo" (Vespucci)
What is a commonist? They still haven't taught you how to spell?
What is a commonist? They still haven't taught you how to spell?
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
He gunna get Gadaffi’d if he’s not careful
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
HikingMan · 56-60, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout Ain’t no millionaires or celebrities selling off their second and third homes that they own in NYC. Not a single one.
Maybe a few are changing their desired residency status but none of them are giving up what they got there….
That’s just a delusional take that totally discounts reality.
Maybe a few are changing their desired residency status but none of them are giving up what they got there….
That’s just a delusional take that totally discounts reality.
Waveney · M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout Celebrities are fleeing is bullshit unless you can actually name them and provide evidence. Screaming “GTFO” doesn’t turn your made-up claim into a fact. It just shows you’ve run out of arguments.
Not that you ever have any evidence to back up anything you're saying 😂🕺🏻
Not that you ever have any evidence to back up anything you're saying 😂🕺🏻
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
turningthekeys · 31-35, F
Dw the landlords aren't going bankrupt lol, you're either naive or you're a greedy landlord yourself.
JPWhoo · 36-40, M
@Greenthumb Fine, don’t give us socialism, just give us whatever the hell the Nordic countries have. Mamdani’s not doing anything that would be out of place in the Nordic countries.
Rolexeo · 31-35, M
@Greenthumb At least it will disenfranchise the rich.
Greenthumb · 56-60, M
@Rolexeo Who are "The Rich"? Anyone that makes more money than you?
MoveAlong · 70-79, M
But...but...but....this will put the slumlords out of business.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
For examples of 'creeping communism' one need only cite the current administration taking significant equity positions in several large american corporations.
Apparently the failed President desperately shouting 'communism!' is perfectly happy to pursue public ownership of previously private businesses
Apparently the failed President desperately shouting 'communism!' is perfectly happy to pursue public ownership of previously private businesses
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@newjaninev2 At this rate they will be on par with Canada in about half a century. 😂
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@newjaninev2 Of course. I am a socialist. I don't support feudalism with extra steps.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
hunkalove · 70-79, M
It will force them to sell the properties. Hopefully the next owners won't be so greedy.
HikingMan · 56-60, M
@hunkalove They’re not selling anything. They just tie shit up in courts as they reap the rent.
This is something that he sees and knows, which is why he’s advocating for tenants to use escrow accounts. He hasn’t actually told anyone to just stop paying rent.
He wants tenants to withhold the rent in a legal manner that will force these corporate entities into the overdue maintenance.
It’s all legalese that normal people are unaware of and that these corporate entities use daily to fuck people over.
This is something that he sees and knows, which is why he’s advocating for tenants to use escrow accounts. He hasn’t actually told anyone to just stop paying rent.
He wants tenants to withhold the rent in a legal manner that will force these corporate entities into the overdue maintenance.
It’s all legalese that normal people are unaware of and that these corporate entities use daily to fuck people over.
Greenthumb · 56-60, M
@HikingMan correct, the city will force them into receivership.
Greenthumb · 56-60, M
@hunkalove The next owner will be the city. Wait and see. This is what anti capitalists do. It will be a uptopia, right?
Greenthumb · 56-60, M
There are two types of Socialists. The rich virtue signaling nepo babies and entertainers that feel guilty for being rich but will not give up any wealth. And the people that cannot make it on their own, because they do not want to do what it takes to be successful.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@Greenthumb And by claiming capitalism pays for socialist programs tells me most 10 year olds have a better grasp on economics than you do.
That is not how that works.
That is not how that works.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@Greenthumb No.. There is a third type of Socialist. The economic rationalist, who has run the numbers and worked out that it costs less in the long term to give enough to the poorer people so that can be healthy and educated enough to either become part of the productive workforse, or serve as consumers, while employed elsewhere, contributing to progress ans development of te economy. Rather that be forced into basic welfare with little chance of a better life for their children, who will be exposed to drugs or crime, which society will have to pay to protect itself from.😷
Greenthumb · 56-60, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow The proof is in the Nordic countries. You should probably do a little research into it. They are the poster child of Socialist programs and they do it because of Capitolism. Please don't believe me, just look it up. Its not a hidden secret or conspiracy.
MethDozer · M
Are we supposed to feel bad for landlords or pretend they are valuable members of society?
Greenthumb · 56-60, M
@MethDozer I don't know any of them so how could I answer? I don't agree with your "shoot them all" mentality.
MethDozer · M
@Greenthumb you dont need to know them personaly. Or at all to answer the question.
MethDozer · M
@Greenthumb I don't agree with you're " the sky is falling" accusation over a mayor encouraging the little people to flex their muscle against rent seekers bleeding them dry.
HikingMan · 56-60, M
I’m going to report this post so that the admins are forced into looking into the OP and the ones that have posted here to see who’s who and what accounts are linked and who’s really real.
Greenthumb · 56-60, M
@HikingMan Wow, come on. What are you afraid of? Did I hurt your feelings? It's just words. Words can't hurt you unless you let them.
Greenthumb · 56-60, M
@HikingMan you sound like you are pro censorship. You will be a good socialist.
RachelLia2003 · 22-25, F
@HikingMan hello commonist. im not him and hes not me. so stop BULLYING
Waveney · M
That’s also a conspiracy theory dressed up as fact.
Mamdani is encouraging tenants to report genuine housing violations and organise, not telling them to invent complaints and bankrupt landlords.
There’s no evidence of a secret plan to force landlords into bankruptcy so the city can grab their properties.
Mamdani is encouraging tenants to report genuine housing violations and organise, not telling them to invent complaints and bankrupt landlords.
There’s no evidence of a secret plan to force landlords into bankruptcy so the city can grab their properties.
Waveney · M
@Greenthumb “Give it a year or two” is just another way of saying you have no evidence.
And your personal "insults" are irrelevant: if your argument depends on predicting a future conspiracy instead of showing evidence for it now, calling me an “anti-capitalist” doesn’t magically make it true.
Sorry that NYC seems to be working for the majority ;)
And your personal "insults" are irrelevant: if your argument depends on predicting a future conspiracy instead of showing evidence for it now, calling me an “anti-capitalist” doesn’t magically make it true.
Sorry that NYC seems to be working for the majority ;)
Greenthumb · 56-60, M
@Waveney it always starts off wonderful. Study Venezuela.
Waveney · M
@Greenthumb You truly have nothing, do you.
Study Venezuela” isn’t evidence that NYC is going to become Venezuela. NYC isn’t a socialist state, and pointing at Venezuela doesn’t prove your claim about Mamdani, especially when you still haven’t produced a single piece of evidence for the conspiracy you started with.
Study Venezuela” isn’t evidence that NYC is going to become Venezuela. NYC isn’t a socialist state, and pointing at Venezuela doesn’t prove your claim about Mamdani, especially when you still haven’t produced a single piece of evidence for the conspiracy you started with.
romell · 51-55, M
How?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
RachelLia2003 · 22-25, F
@newjaninev2 yea some polen-jew author tellin stuff about commonism🙄 u tellin me to trust em yews🙄
Greenthumb · 56-60, M
@newjaninev2 yes under socialism the politicians and their friends will be rich. Most will be lower middle class, but they will have their needs met by the government. But don't worry the powerful will always be nice and do the right thing. There will be no corruption, or misappropriation of tax dollars. It will all be for the people. 😉
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
BohoBabe · M
No, this is just rich people being crybabies, as usual.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
BohoBabe · M
@ReptilianFromPlanetCrush If you can't support someone who is fake religious, I've got some bad news for ya.
@BohoBabe good one. LOL


































