This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
GerOttman · 61-69, M
Short term inconvenience, long term benefit.
beermeplease · M
@GerOttman it will be interesting to see what actually transpires. but i don't think at this point in time trump would think what a global mess he's making 3 months ago...i could be wrong though
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GerOttman and it always will be. Even when that 'inconvenience' becomes catastrophic you'll still be waiting for that long-term benefit.
Because King Donald promised...
Because King Donald promised...
GerOttman · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 Hey! Negative Nancy, or Janie... whatever. Take your pronouns and your negativity and get outta herrrrrre!! I've never seen a sadder bunch of cry babies pray so hard for failure. Turn off the brainwashing machine and go smell some flowers or something!
May the blessings of the relevant diety be upon you.
May the blessings of the relevant diety be upon you.
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
@GerOttman Trump lives only in the moment, not for the long term.
ElwoodBlues · M
@GerOttman Your same crowd kept telling us that if Reagan cut taxes, there would be a short term loss, but long term more revenue - the magic of the "supply side." Yet, in 40+ years, the supply side magic NEVER WORKED. Tax cuts NEVER increased tax revenue.
How deep and how long a recession do we need to convince blinkered individuals that the tariffs that failed repeatedly in history will still fail? Serious question, @GerOttman, how long should we wait before judging the effects of tRump's tariffs? A year? The midterms?? How long???
How deep and how long a recession do we need to convince blinkered individuals that the tariffs that failed repeatedly in history will still fail? Serious question, @GerOttman, how long should we wait before judging the effects of tRump's tariffs? A year? The midterms?? How long???