UK signs “historic” 100 year partnership with Ukraine

@emiliya Please tell me what happened then.

@SinlessOnslaught US meddling. It needs to leave other countries alone.

@emiliya Are you talking about Yanukovych?

@BizSuitStacy truly a sad state of affairs....

@Wireman Quiet, Vlad. Americans are talking with Europeans.

@samueltyler2 A 100-year deal that pledges to give £3 billion a year to Ukraine for next seven years and envisages “military formations” and building military bases in Ukraine is not performative.

@emiliya wow, i guess not, that is a lot of money.

@emiliya With perhaps the exception of the money it is performative because the UK has no means to really do any of that. It is vague promises of something, maybe happening in the future.

As for the money most if not all of that will go directly to UK arms companies, not Ukraine but be earmarked for weapons contracts with Ukraine....so basically corporate welfare for western weapons companies.

@soar2newhighs Why can't politicians focus on their domestic affairs? They neglect their duties at home and cause wars in other countries.

@emiliya Have you told that to Vlad, to stay out of the affairs and lands of sovereign nations? 🤔 No, I thought not.

@emiliya IMO Not in their best interests.

@soar2newhighs Trump is the definition of that.