UK signs “historic” 100 year partnership with Ukraine
What is UK planning to do with Ukraine for 100 years? Why can't Starmer deal with the problems in UK instead of interfering in Ukraine?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
It is more performative, to show support against Putin!
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@emiliya wow, i guess not, that is a lot of money.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@emiliya With perhaps the exception of the money it is performative because the UK has no means to really do any of that. It is vague promises of something, maybe happening in the future.
As for the money most if not all of that will go directly to UK arms companies, not Ukraine but be earmarked for weapons contracts with Ukraine....so basically corporate welfare for western weapons companies.
As for the money most if not all of that will go directly to UK arms companies, not Ukraine but be earmarked for weapons contracts with Ukraine....so basically corporate welfare for western weapons companies.