Top | Newest First | Oldest First
beckyromero · 36-40, F
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
He is wishy-washy.
He put in three of the supreme court justice, just so Rowe versus Wade would get overturned and put into the states hands.
Yet he is not as extreme as some would like on the issue. He wouldn't be for a total ban no matter what, like what has happened in Arizona recently. In fact he was against going that far.
He would push for some controls on the federal level. Yet he is being unrealistic. Because he put it into the states hands.
The politics here was simply to get rid of Rowe versus Wade so they could make other federal laws.
That's wishy-washy! 🤷🏻♂️
If the supreme Court follows through to form, then ANY federal law should be unconstitutional.
This is why there should be a constitutional amendment covering abortions as well as what it is to be even human.
He put in three of the supreme court justice, just so Rowe versus Wade would get overturned and put into the states hands.
Yet he is not as extreme as some would like on the issue. He wouldn't be for a total ban no matter what, like what has happened in Arizona recently. In fact he was against going that far.
He would push for some controls on the federal level. Yet he is being unrealistic. Because he put it into the states hands.
The politics here was simply to get rid of Rowe versus Wade so they could make other federal laws.
That's wishy-washy! 🤷🏻♂️
If the supreme Court follows through to form, then ANY federal law should be unconstitutional.
This is why there should be a constitutional amendment covering abortions as well as what it is to be even human.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@CestManan I don't believe they are grasping. AI is huge even in China see the tiktoc issue. They have already successfully cloned animals. And have a DNA banks of thousands of animals... "Just in case" it is needed. And Elon musk is working on the computer interfaces with astounding sucess with paralyzed people.
Reason10 · 61-69, M
@DeWayfarer Overturning Roe was a monumental step. It was an unconstitutional opinion that need to be overturned.
Of course, if the DemoNazis want another federal Roe, all they have to do is just pass a law and have it signed by a DemoNazi president.
As it is, Roe's overturning left the matter to the states. It looks like nobody in Washington wants it any other way.
Of course, if the DemoNazis want another federal Roe, all they have to do is just pass a law and have it signed by a DemoNazi president.
As it is, Roe's overturning left the matter to the states. It looks like nobody in Washington wants it any other way.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Reason10 the current ConservoMarxist do NOT believe in democracy. They have shown this by allowing States to form mini religious states and disallowing:
[quote] "Government of the People, by the People, for the People!" [/quote]
Look up who said that and noticed that it's not by the "States"!
You're not even conservative anymore! And this SCOTUS are traitors by Lincoln's standards!
Ever heard of the Lincoln project? I suggest you look them up!
[quote] "Government of the People, by the People, for the People!" [/quote]
Look up who said that and noticed that it's not by the "States"!
You're not even conservative anymore! And this SCOTUS are traitors by Lincoln's standards!
Ever heard of the Lincoln project? I suggest you look them up!
tindrummer · M
Strictmichael75 · 61-69, M
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Reason10 · 61-69, M
He once claimed that he was pro-life. Of course, talk is cheap.
He DID appoint THREE Supreme Court justices who just happened to have actually read the Constitution. And the Supreme Court overturned Roe and sent it back to the states.
That's a better pro life record than any other Republican.
He DID appoint THREE Supreme Court justices who just happened to have actually read the Constitution. And the Supreme Court overturned Roe and sent it back to the states.
That's a better pro life record than any other Republican.
@Reason10 You call that good? He has allowed the Republicans to make great strides in their war against women.
Gusman · 61-69, M
I think he was always pro-life but then changed he opinion to garner more supporters.
@Gusman I rather doubt that. He seems the sort to have funded a number of secret abortions.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
@NativePortlander1970 Good.