Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

New York Becomes First State to Pass Legislation Banning Use of Natural Gas for Heating and Cooking



The Biden Regime said reports claiming they were seeking to ban gas stoves was a conspiracy theory.

Chuck Schumer went out of his way to chastise those concerned saying, “Nobody is taking away your gas stove.”


The Gateway Pundit reported that earlier this year, the US Consumer Product Safety Commission said gas-powered stoves are a ‘hidden health hazard.’

Although Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm mocked the millions of Americans concerned about the federal government’s plans to put restrictions on gas stoves, she admitted the Biden Regime wants to ban “some” gas stoves.

Now, New York State is banning the use of natural gas for heating and cooking in some new buildings.

According to The New York Times, “The provisions will require new buildings to be constructed with only electric hookups for appliances and utilities beginning in 2025. The law will go into effect for buildings with fewer than seven stories beginning in 2026. The requirements will kick in for taller buildings by 2029.”

[b][i]They can always go after single home dwellings later. Geez - the left sucks.[/i][/b]
wildbill83 · 36-40, M Best Comment
I wonder if any of the advocates of these bans are even remotely aware that LNG isn't just used for cooking stoves, but it's also the primary energy source for hvac (heating and cooling), water heating (tankless/on demand systems), and backup/emergency power generation. And by primary, I mean 80-90% of all industrial & commercial buildings

of all the commercial heating methods, LNG is the most efficient & cost effective; whereas electric furnaces & electric baseboard heating are the least efficient and most expensive

gas stoves are 300% more energy efficient than electric stoves, and they're quicker as far as heat up and cool down times; they're also simpler & last longer than electric stoves.

Electric is fine in rural areas, where energy production is abundant & usage low, and the grid load is minimal & consistent. It becomes problematic in urban areas where energy supply can barely keep up with demand, and massive load shifts (like a bunch of AC units all turning on at the same time) completely overwhelm powerlines and substations (they simply can't react quick enough to maintain current), hence brownouts/blackouts; or the lines themselves can't carry the required current (this is why your breakers trip when you try to run something that requires a lot of power on a long extension cord, especially multiple tools/appliances on a splitter/single receptacle)

There simply isn't enough electrical power available to make 100% electric practical. And "green" energies like wind and solar don't counteract any of the shortfalls either. Hydro, Nuclear, Coal, LNG, etc. power plants rarely run at 100% capacity all the time, they keep turbines/generators in reserve for redundancy and increased demand/peak loading (i.e. they can "ramp up" production to meet energy demands on a grid)

for all intensive purposes, solar and wind operate at 100% all the time, contingent on available sunlight & wind, there is no self contained redundancy nor power available for increased loads (instead they buy power from competitors that use alternate energies, & usually at a premium). And other than hydroelectric & pumped storage hydropower (pumping water into a reservoir to use in gravity turbines later), there is no efficient means of storing "green" energy. Batteries are too size & cost prohibitive to use on a large scale, nor posses the required discharge rates for large scale usage/demand.

In the end, New Yorkers will pay more for more unreliable power, experience more brownouts/blackouts; and that LNG that they refuse to burn will just be sold & burnt elsewhere (which may actually reduce LNG prices for the rest of us), and while New York politicians are patting themselves on the back and expecting gratitude from their subordinates for "saving the world", they'll be selling their subsidized oil & natural gas that they no longer use, to other states, and make millions in the process...
wildbill83 · 36-40, M
@SW-User never said anything about politics nor Trump, but yeah sure, okay; start calling me a maga republican racist nazi, etc. now since that's apparently all you're even capable of. 🙄
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

carpediem · 61-69, M
Natural gas is a clean alternative compared to many other energy sources. These people are just stupid. Apparently the electrical energy folks are paying, sorry "contributing" more than their natural gas competitors.
carpediem · 61-69, M
@4meAndyou They know. There's something much more nefarious than just stupidity here.
4meAndyou · F
@carpediem Wish I knew what that was. It seems SO senseless.
Virgo79 · 61-69, M
@carpediem you can bet your pay check they're getting something out of it.
Natural gas probably supported Trump
SmoothKnight · 51-55, M
If they want to eliminate gas powered devices, perhaps they should consider duct taping Schumer's mouth.
akindheart · 61-69, F
@SmoothKnight BEST COMMENT!! or AOC
SmoothKnight · 51-55, M
@akindheart

LoL... thank you 🤣
specman · 51-55, M
Another conspiracy theory that ends up being true.
The left does suck
SW-User
@Budwick It's not government overreach. The vast majority of Americans want their government to tackle the climate crisis. You can't start whining when it starts to do just that.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@SW-User The vast majority of Americans agree that man made climate change is a bunch of hooey and a socialist power grab.
SW-User
@Budwick Prove it 😂
Snuffy1957 · 61-69, M
Biden is a useless as tits on a chicken cockslut!!
Barefooter25 · 46-50, M
New York becomes the first state to pass legislation to convert itself into a 3rd world country. I just fixed your headline.
specman · 51-55, M
Another so called conspiracy theory proven to be correct!
The left are such liars!
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
I think we should bring back wood stoves - the pot bellied kind - for cooking and heating. Especially in NYC.

And what about gas-lights? Those were cool! open flames, spouting from sconces in your hallways and bedroom?

If that seems too dangerous, we could go back to kerosene lanterns and candles, I suppose.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@SusanInFlorida Are you afraid of fire?

SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@Budwick actually yes. but that's NOT why i prefer to cook indoors, with modern appliances.
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@Budwick my reply was satire. but i suppose people could burn books and furniture. remember that scene in the film "Garden State"?
trollslayer · 46-50, M
Probably will create a demand for older houses, or loopholes where they will leave one wall of an older house standing so as to call it a "remodel" and not new construction.

I wonder how many buyers of new houses really want gas stoves. Where I live it seems like people are getting rid of gas stoves in favor of electric. I just bought a new gas range mainly because a new electric range would have required a service panel upgrade.

That said I am definitely not in favor of an outright ban because my feeling is that most people will choose electric anyway. Especially households with women, because it seems like the women I know always claim they smell a gas leak...:)

But this isn't the first thing that got banned or phased out that people raised a huge stink about and turns out most people didn't care (analog television, leaded gas, etc)
Budwick · 70-79, M
@trollslayer Gas is less expensive.
Better to cook with - far more control.
When storms take out electric - gas heat still works.
Gas is a no brainer.
trollslayer · 46-50, M
@Budwick I agree, but many would rather not fool with it. When I recently bought my new range, there were few gas options at the appliance store, even in a neighborhood that was 100% gas 70 years ago. I could use the same arguments about manual transmissions, but few want to fool with them anymore.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@trollslayer I ran into the same thing.
I had them ORDER the gas range we wanted.
Easy Peasy
Johnson212 · 61-69, M
New studies show that gas stoves are worse for the environment than previously thought, and contribute directly to global warming because they constantly leak small amounts of methane even while they're turned off. Gas stoves can also emit high levels of nitrogen oxides, which raises public concerns about health impacts and air quality indoors.

But I like to cook, on a gas stove, so that is what I have. If Biden will buy me one of those induction electric stoves I will gladly get rid of my gas stove, they are every bit as good as gas and easier to clean up. And the oven if he will buy me an electric combi steam oven I will gladly get rid of my gas oven.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Johnson212 So, you are easily bought off.
Good to know.
This message was deleted by its author.
This message was deleted by its author.
4meAndyou · F
Kathy Hochul is the one behind the gas stove debacle.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Budwick · 70-79, M
@jshm2 Biden tapped several trillion for infrastructure.
Problem solved.
wildbill83 · 36-40, M
@jshm2 most cities are still using underground electrical infrastructure that's well over 50 years old; unless they start hanging power lines on buildings, they'd have to dig up every street to install new lines to support a 100% electric power grid...
SW-User
Good! About time gas stoves were banned. I use an induction cookersand my fair trade tofu is browned to perfection with but a whisper of inducted heat.

The world is changing, old man. Deal with it 🙂
This message was deleted by its author.
SW-User
And, of course, what is conveniently overlooked here is the fact that it's for MOST new buildings built from 2026 onwards.
SW-User
[quote]When the phase-in starts [b]in 2026[/b], newly constructed buildings will have to forego fossil fuel equipment in favor of devices like induction ranges and heat pumps that run on electricity.

[b]The state mandate applies only to new construction and does not affect existing buildings.
[/b]
"I[b] want to be very clear. I know people love to misinterpret this, but people with existing gas stoves, you're welcome to keep them," [/b]Hochul told reporters Tuesday, before lawmakers began voting on the budget.

"This is where our nation has to go eventually," she said "But I want to make sure that it's not a bumpy road to the transition."

[/quote]
Budwick · 70-79, M
@SW-User Let it happen naturally AFTER there's something viable.
SW-User
@Budwick Renewables ARE viable. The age of coal, oil and gas is ending. Fact.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@SW-User No they are not.
California already limits who can charge their car and when.
Infrastructure wont's support.

You can't force some things - you need patience.
Azlotto · M
Oh well..Them voters aren't coming on my property when they get cold.
Azlotto · M
@SW-User How do you know I'm one of them [quote]far-right nutjobs[/quote]
SW-User
@Azlotto Because anyone who is against sensible climate policies on this website is a far-right nutjob.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This message was deleted by its author.
4meAndyou · F
@MarmeeMarch Not to mention John Kerry's private jet...or the gazillions of OTHER private jets owned by the pampered elites, who insist they can NOT take public flights.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
I've been saying that. @sunsporter1649

 
Post Comment