@
boudinMan since google is such a challenge for you:
It's more like you don't understand debate 101. You make the claim, you prove it. But ad hominem it away.
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/nuclear-disarmament-rally-new-york-central-park
https://www.nps.gov/articles/antinuclearactivism.htm
https://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/ad-suggests-trump-loves-nuclear-war/
And what's this supposed to prove? How does it support your claim that:
i just find it amusing how the left, with the aid of the media, clamors about nuclear war when there's a republican president, but not when there's a democrat in power. they did it to reagan and to trump... probably both bush's as well.
And this:
https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/dismantling-liberal-myths-refresher-course-ronald-reagan
??? It's a propaganda piece from the Heritage Foundation, pure fantasy. Reagan's arms race program, get us into a deficit so bad, we could not climb out of that financial pit.
no, i never said the left was clamoring for nuclear war.
Which is a lie, because this is exactly what you said.
Are you having trouble understanding that anti-nuke activists have always existed, and they don't go dormant, when we have a Democrat in the White House?
Are you having trouble understanding that no on on the left is clamoring for nuclear war, and that the current position of the Democrat Party, is to make it clear to Putin that a nuclear adventure in the Ukraine, is not going to be met with silence.
Are you having trouble understanding that if we don't take a clear position on this issue, there WILL be a nuclear war?
Are you having trouble understanding a simple children's book: If you give a moose a muffin?
But it's clear that you're having a problem with understanding.