This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultSad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why I'm agnostic about Boris Johnson leaving.

He obviously deserved to go and I have multiple disagreements with his politics but whatever replaces him is going to be at least as bad for the British people.

The British people have realised that Johnson is corrupt, dishonest and self-centred. No shit. This was all public knowledge long before he became prime minister. It seems really weird to me that only now these character traits are something that rule him out of government. It's his lies about Christmas parties (breaking his own lockdown rules) and the lie about knowing a minister was accused of sexual assault that cost him. But why get angry about this? Why feel betrayed? I would be personally shocked if he didn't lie about these things. Of course, he thinks that the rules don't apply to him, he's Boris Johnson.

Much more consequential for the lives and livelihoods of British people are the lies about Covid and Brexit. Our government handled the pandemic much worse than most, only to be bailed out when a British company discovered the first good vaccine. There is not a single economist who denies that Brexit has not contributed massively to the cost of living crisis but plenty of politicians do, Johnson chief amongst them. Also factor in other borderline bullshit about 'levelling-up' and supporting the NHS etc. Any one of these things should be a bigger scandal than partygate.

The likelihood is, however, that whoever comes next will be worse (at least in some ways). Rishi Sunak is a fiscal austerian and deficit hawk. In plain English: This means that he will cut benefits and services, whilst keeping taxes high on ordinary people. Johnson - I guess to his credit - disagreed with Sunak over this. Almost all the other candidates are likewise to the right of Johnson on economic policy and will have economic recovery plans that place the burden on the poor and away from their affluent home-owner voting base as much as they possibly can.

This is the Conservative Party. Its the political vessel for the British establishment and it always will be. It's still the party that Thatcher made in her own image and their leading figures care much more about Ayn Rand than the working class red-wall voters who wanted to get Brexit done. The rich will be protected and the most unequal of Europe's major nations will become even more so.
AdaXI · 41-45, T
Yeah I mean I can't disagree with you on your key points although Brexiting I certainly can't blame the government for that one. I mean all the big boys in government at the time were all around Cameron, the BBC news were, jeezus they even got Obama over to threaten us with the you will basically go to the back of the queue if you leave the EU with the trading deals and of course Boris campaigned for us to Brexit but is that his fault really?

Like you rightly point out EVERYONE knew who Boris was, he already had a reputation for being a gaff prone buffoon so I hardly think we voted based on what Boris said when there was our own PM, the American president, all the EU's PMs, all the major business people on the planet were all on telly 24/7 all saying stay and hell once we'd voted to Brexit and Cameron resigned, Theresa May got in she called an election we could of then just voted to give either party power to actually do something about it but we didn't , we voted straight down the middle meaning the remainers and the hard Brexiters all then had enough power in both parties to stop the trade negotiations being past through parliament, also cost Theresa May her job, who to be honest if we'd all voted for her at the election given here some power to get things past though parliament (like we did with Boris once the deadline had past and it was too late) we'd of had a very soft Brexit basically duplicating the contracts and resigning them as Theresa May was a remainer that's all she wanted to do but for some reason 50% of the voting public didn't seem to think that she was the right person for the job so ....

So like I say you make good points but if your someone who is a life long 'red wall' voter who are you even talking about these days exactly it's not the 1970s? Jeezus considering they're all well educated career politicians on both sides these days you really think Oxford educated Starmer is any different to a fucking Tory politician? Our political parties have been more central for probably 25-30 years and the vast majority of us just vote for whichever party will do a better job over the next 4 years or whatever until the next election it's the reason why we don't have this left right swing like you get in America when Labour get back in which they will what do you think will change? Oh we will introduce 'gay marriage' no tories did that already, why? Because both parties are central it wouldm't matter which government was in power that would of got past and it won't matter which government is in the rich people won't pay more taxes because Labour have already tried 'super taxing' them before and it didn't end very well so other than a few pennies here and there it won't make much difference.

I hope you get what I'm trying to say here cause like saying red or blue that's like making voting a supporters club like a football team where you'll just support them whatever, even when they're utterly shiiiite, or when a party needs support to do something important and really it's that kind of irresponsible oldie worldy voting that's the real reason why Brexit was so bad. Nothing to do with any particular party.

You have a good day x
乂ᴼ◡ᴼ乂
KarenDuponteDurose · 46-50, F
The fact is that so many of us could say 'I told you so'...and then you add to that fact that so many people didn't want to vote for Labour, that they were scared that Labour would ruin their lives. That's the joke, really. Would Labour have ruined their lives? I think not.

To his credit, Boris I felt was fairly quick (compared to some, and unfortunately quicker than I feel that Labour would have done..) in getting things locked down. Sure, he could have been quicker. I think every country - with, perhaps the exception of China itself and New Zealand - could have been quicker.

Documents have shown - as per Panorama programme - that the Government felt that a pandemic was a never-event and thus had no stock (PPE) in light of such event, as per most countries protocols. That makes me angry.

I have met Boris and, yes he's an idiot but quite charming with it. You can see how some people just get carried away with all his lies.

Cards on the table; I've never been a Tory voter (seeing what they did to my home of Newcastle in the 70's and 80's educated me on that) and never voted for Brexit as I could see all the hurdles (for hurdles, read 'fuck ups') it would bring to light, never mind the concept of a United Europe which, for all it's problems, still had it's merits.

The government have screwed up the economy and made the poor so much poorer. I know of so many people now homeless because landlords are after 50% increase in rents etc.

...and it's sad the place this country is in again...

Karen
@KarenDuponteDurose I'm not a propopnet of a lot of what's spoken about regarding politics https://voca.ro/1fCIxqft0v9I

[media=https://youtu.be/zeAEFEXvcBg]
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@KarenDuponteDurose Homelessness specifically street sleeping has risen by 163% since 2010. Boris Johnson vowed to end it. The purpose of the Tories is to lie and take as much away from the working class.
KarenDuponteDurose · 46-50, F
@Entwistle Whilst i'm certainly not going to defend the Tories, I wouldn't say that they exist to lie....that would be very foolhardy to actually state, but most have either a privileged background or, at the very least, aspirations of such a background. Yes, commendable, but never without knowing about the real world and the common man/woman...and that's what they lack to grasp - the struggles of normal people....
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
You obviously don't get it. Yes, his ineptness was always known, but it finally reached a point where it became intolerable. It's standard procedure when someone goes overboard with their antics.

Believing there is no one to replace him worth his/her salt (so to speak) is about as negative as you can get without calling for all out anarchy.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Apparently, I am the only adult in this room...
@MarkPaul Nope. You are just a pathological liar desperate for attention and not worth taking seriously.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Well, I'm not the one acting like a child.
I think you have heard me say before that complaints about Bojo's corruption means nothing. They knew he was corrupt and a liar when they voted him in.

And the jokes and memes....the benny hill stuff, whilst all funny and deserved is also really sad that as a nation we are in such a dire state and we are joking about it.

The most fucked up thing is.... he is not going until autumn ....why? Because he has a party planned

Ffs

I am more concerned about the likes of jeremy hunt than rishi
KarenDuponteDurose · 46-50, F
@InOtterWords Totally. Jeremy Hunt caused a HUGE rift in the Health Service when he was a minister. I hate to use the the word, but a complete shower of shit as a human being...

Hate the Tories, that's all that I need to say...

🤔
SW-User
I don't know much about British politics, but I do know that Chris Pincher's sexual misconduct has been a problem and publicly known since 2017, so the fact it just now supposedly caused Boris' downfall is sus af. Boris is out because his party is done with him.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@SW-User They never really like him in the first place but they used his charisma. They ditched him because they calculated that can't win an election with him. It's that simple. The Tories are ruthless and efficient this way. They even got rid of Thatcher when she hit the point of being a liability.
SW-User
I'm inclined to agree with much of this, which is why I find British politics so profoundly uninspiring and well, depressing.

I think they definitely got it wrong with lockdowns, but likely not in the same way you do. Locking down has been an economic disaster for all nations, and was an absolute mistake. I think that Brexit shouldn't have happened, but it did and there *are* things that the Conservative Party could do to get more out of it for the good of the country and most of the people in it, but they never will. It's just made it easier for them to exploit people and allow a very select few to get richer.

Sunak is just a horrible choice. For some unfathomable reason though, there's people who actually find him appealing. His fiscal policies are the worst. It's a desperately miserable situation for the U.K.

I disagree with most of the Labour Party's social policies, but the Con's are so bad that it may outweigh how undeniably awful much of what Labour espouses is. It wouldn't be so terrible if the Con's had some invigorating things to say and do about various pertinent social issues, but the ones who do just get ignored and they aren't taken very seriously. Maybe it is preferable for people to listen to Labour's shit if they'll have more money and therefore happier lives. I like the idea of enough people voting for them and the Liberal Democrats, that a coalition is formed.

Any person who isn't a millionaire who votes Con is a fool.
Rhode57 · 56-60, M
I have given up worrying about it no matter who is the next conservative leader their all just as bad . At the next election I shall vote for one of the smaller parties probably Britain first or such like . I have lost faith in the 3 major parties and feel its about time this country has a change from the same old same old . Maybe if enough people feel the same we will see a different party get in and a change of the way this country is governed . Sadly if this doesnt happen I fear we are all gonna suffer for it .
Northwest · M
Agree, nothing really changed except for the labeling. And even that is going to take a few months to complete.
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
I think Boris's greatest failing was his inability to grasp detail and apply himself to the obvious problems created by his government's contradictory policies. Most of the candidates are trying to outbid each other with promises of tax cuts, which suggest that they are too are incapable of governing competently. I don't agree with Rishi Sunak's or Jeremy Hunt's personal visions, but they do at least have serious experience of government.
LegendofPeza · 56-60, M
Whoever gets it needs to sort out the NI protocol problem sharpish , and also reset the country's entire relationship with Brussels. You think there's anyone standing who fits the bill ?
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@LegendofPeza Slim to non-existent. The final two get voted by the party membership. A candidate willing to roll back to a softer Brexit option and say so publicly would get get 15% on a good day.
LegendofPeza · 56-60, M
@Burnley123 Isn't there talk of the 1922 commitee changing the rules also to have the vote just amongst the parliamentary party in order to speed the process up to get him out the door asap ?
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@LegendofPeza It's news to me but not surprising. I wouldn't place hope in that for a solution to the protocol though. A softer Brexit would be seen by voters and party members as a betrayal. There is no way that Tory MPs would choose that as a hill to die on.
Pretty much... I've already called it that we will have a return to austerity with Sunak at the helm...

On the plus side, Universal Credit will go back towards what Prescott wanted when he created it - with the poor being forced into virtual homelessness and working gig economies just to make ends meet.
New boss is the same as the old boss.
MartinII · 70-79, M
You are right of course that the new leader will be more Tory, or Thatcherite, than Johnson.

I’m interested to know in what way you think the government’s handling of Covid was bad. Although it was lucky that a British company developed the first effective vaccine, the government did deliver it to the public much more quickly than anyone else in Europe, which it could not have done had it still been in the EU. That apart, my view is that lockdown was unnecessary, probably counterproductive, and certainly economically and socially damaging. The government was far too slow to challenge the false assumptions of the scientific advisers. What’s your view?
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@MartinII It's late and I'm in the pub..I will come back to you on this.
MartinII · 70-79, M
@Burnley123 Great, have a pint on me!
it would be like if here in the united states we elected ted nugent president thats all I thought when Boris johnson became Prime minister. Also the entire field of economics is pretty uniform against the idea that protectionism works for the benefit of any country.

and that goes from the left to the right of the profession. it's pretty unanimous that free trade is the only way.

So of course brexit would backfire.
@KarenDuponteDurose the point economist are trying to make is that it doesn't make sense to view the economy as an individual and that while some individuals benefit from protectionist policies the nation suffers because a few things happen with tariffs and that sort of thing which is essentially that those countries enact their own in retaliation and in the end for a few privileged workers in your country who benefit the whole rest of the nation suffers, we did this during the trump era in the united states and all it resulted in was higher aluminum prices among other things which just translated into less money to spend elsewhere and honestly we need a new economics because the real "job creators" are not billionaires but every day consumers. All it does is screw consumers over. and when you fuck with them we can't do what we do best which is keep people employed.
KarenDuponteDurose · 46-50, F
@BetweenKittensandRiots Oh, I agree with that, totally. Countries need to 'play nice' with other countries and then everyone will benefit. Unfortunately, human beings (and most certainly politicians!) aren't like that - some are more active than others, some are lazy - and the ones that are proactive start resenting the less active ones, thus wanting a 'better deal'.

Happens in life, happens in work, happens in politics.

The whole concept that people were fed for years on the 'trickle down' effect has been shown to be a lie, or at least greatly exaggerated, and, as you said, the real driving force behind any country are the everyday people - the workers/consumers - that keep it ticking over, not the billionaires.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@BetweenKittensandRiots Many millions of us knew Brexit would be a disaster. It was based on lies.
Latest Government figures say it's costing the British economy £100 billion pounds a year in lost sales alone.
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
Oh no question.

But for now, just appreciate that this is extremely funny.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
Thinking changing party leader will change the party or its policies is madness.
Starsandfire · 31-35, F
Agreed. I’m glad Boris has gone but dreading the next.
Lacemaker · 41-45, F
Better the devil you know.......

I dread to think who'll replace him 🤷🏼‍♀️
Entwistle · 56-60, M
The illusion of democracy.
Voting is like having to choose between a horse shit or a dog shit sandwich...either way its going to be awful.
It just goes on and on and on..they all promise the earth and never improve the ordinary man/womans life.
There really needs to be a 'None Of Them' option on the ballot papers.
I'm going to miss that hair.
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
Be grateful you live in a country where conservative politicians occasionally play lip service to virtue.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M

 
Post Comment