This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultSad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why I'm agnostic about Boris Johnson leaving.

He obviously deserved to go and I have multiple disagreements with his politics but whatever replaces him is going to be at least as bad for the British people.

The British people have realised that Johnson is corrupt, dishonest and self-centred. No shit. This was all public knowledge long before he became prime minister. It seems really weird to me that only now these character traits are something that rule him out of government. It's his lies about Christmas parties (breaking his own lockdown rules) and the lie about knowing a minister was accused of sexual assault that cost him. But why get angry about this? Why feel betrayed? I would be personally shocked if he didn't lie about these things. Of course, he thinks that the rules don't apply to him, he's Boris Johnson.

Much more consequential for the lives and livelihoods of British people are the lies about Covid and Brexit. Our government handled the pandemic much worse than most, only to be bailed out when a British company discovered the first good vaccine. There is not a single economist who denies that Brexit has not contributed massively to the cost of living crisis but plenty of politicians do, Johnson chief amongst them. Also factor in other borderline bullshit about 'levelling-up' and supporting the NHS etc. Any one of these things should be a bigger scandal than partygate.

The likelihood is, however, that whoever comes next will be worse (at least in some ways). Rishi Sunak is a fiscal austerian and deficit hawk. In plain English: This means that he will cut benefits and services, whilst keeping taxes high on ordinary people. Johnson - I guess to his credit - disagreed with Sunak over this. Almost all the other candidates are likewise to the right of Johnson on economic policy and will have economic recovery plans that place the burden on the poor and away from their affluent home-owner voting base as much as they possibly can.

This is the Conservative Party. Its the political vessel for the British establishment and it always will be. It's still the party that Thatcher made in her own image and their leading figures care much more about Ayn Rand than the working class red-wall voters who wanted to get Brexit done. The rich will be protected and the most unequal of Europe's major nations will become even more so.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
I'm inclined to agree with much of this, which is why I find British politics so profoundly uninspiring and well, depressing.

I think they definitely got it wrong with lockdowns, but likely not in the same way you do. Locking down has been an economic disaster for all nations, and was an absolute mistake. I think that Brexit shouldn't have happened, but it did and there *are* things that the Conservative Party could do to get more out of it for the good of the country and most of the people in it, but they never will. It's just made it easier for them to exploit people and allow a very select few to get richer.

Sunak is just a horrible choice. For some unfathomable reason though, there's people who actually find him appealing. His fiscal policies are the worst. It's a desperately miserable situation for the U.K.

I disagree with most of the Labour Party's social policies, but the Con's are so bad that it may outweigh how undeniably awful much of what Labour espouses is. It wouldn't be so terrible if the Con's had some invigorating things to say and do about various pertinent social issues, but the ones who do just get ignored and they aren't taken very seriously. Maybe it is preferable for people to listen to Labour's shit if they'll have more money and therefore happier lives. I like the idea of enough people voting for them and the Liberal Democrats, that a coalition is formed.

Any person who isn't a millionaire who votes Con is a fool.