Some Democrats seem to be directly or passively encouraging this. The death of a Supreme Court justice would lead to Biden naming the replacement.
Considering the death count following Jeff Epstein's arrest and the trail of bodies that follow the Clintons, I believe this is the time to be very concerned.
@Budwick you missed a few more. JFK, Jr and all of those on board that plane. Because at the time of that plane crash, he was leading Majorly in the Polls prior to the NY Primary against a Hillary Rodham Clinton.
@dakotaviper The JFk Jr death is enough to fill a book by itself. Way over his head flying that airplane, broke dozens of Federal Air Regulations. If negligent homicide could be charged poshumously it would have fit. Flimsy autopsy, cremation and scattered within a few hours after they recovered his body. Uncle Edward was apparently experienced with how to clean things up after such incidents.
Schumer's words were unfortunate and ill advised, imo, but on the other hand, unlike the guy with the gun, I don't see much suggesting corruption, or threats of force in that picture.
Having said that, we've already had actual attacks on Judges and their families and I really do think something needs to be done to prevent more in the future.
It seems that Trump’s existence is the excuse for virtually anything the left does or wants to do. You’re what used to be called a moderate. Not many of us left. Maybe we tilt one way or the other depending on the issue but we view each and every issue seaparetely and on its own merit or lack thereof. Those on both extremes don’t like us. @MistyCee
As long as those threats and intimidation tactics are used against Conservatives, Republicans, and anyone who disagrees with anyone from the Political Left, then YES they are 100% Legal according to everyone on the Left.
I could be mistaken here but having read the USC code cited, the only one I could see in violation by his communications about certain justices is Chuck Schumer.
I’m looking at the code and with respect to anyone protesting peacefully they are protected by the first amendment and the code does not directly address that.
What I’m not sure about is if any laws are being violated regarding any children of the justices. Apparently justice Barrett’s children may have been made a part of this anger by those opposed to the ruling that will come down, and certain information has or may have been released on them and their physical locations.
As for those opposed to the leaked ruling which may come to pass, these people do not have the will or fortitude to do anything at the Supreme Court like what took place on Jan 6th. And that is probably in their best interests not to.
@Thinkerbell Perhaps tomorrow will be the litmus test. It will take place outside the Supreme Court. And then we’ll see what happens. As for the image whether it was of police or Marshall’s, someone took a stand and said these people WILL be protected.
Garland was once put up as the Democrat pick for the supreme court and didn't make it.
Now he refuses to act on the freaking LAW
18 U.S. Code § 1503 - Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally (a) Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States.....
...And that is in his capacity of Attorney General of the United States, who is supposed to ENFORCE the law.
But with crooked people like this trying to orchestrate the deaths of the members of our Supreme Court, I think we should all be on our knees praying for them...and in January 2023 the sitting Republican House and Senate must impeach this crooked ba$tard.
Try to understand. It's ok when democrats don't like the people being threatened. It's only when someone they do like has any sort of threat that all hell breaks lose. Imagine if the justice in question was Justice Sotomayor. It would be non-stop media coverage with Trump to blame.
A whirlwind? That sounds vicious! And those people on that public walkway look sooo intimidating! Whew! It's good to know the there are people like you that can call out those meanies... I suppose this is what a loving peaceful, non intimidating protest looks like...
@Budwick i approve of fair and just law enforcement. I had the advantage of first hand knowledge of how corrupt, slimy and self interested a police force can be. And how one good cop can make a difference in peoples lives. Unfortunately, those good cops are few and far between. The capitol police were doing their jobs.
Why not just arm the justices? Maybe a "resource" officer for every justice? One entry only for each of their houses? Maybe we can arm the family members and the justice clerks?
in most other countries yeah.. that would be bad.. but the usa stopped being a country that cared for law and order on 6th januara 2021...
you guys dun goofed... seriously i dont know who is gonna win the next presidental election but i am absolkutely sure the looser will not accept the results and the country collapses.
@MadgirlI would differ with you. I would say we stopped caring about law and order during the summer of 2020, when MANY buildings were burned, cars destroyed, multiple stores looted during the BLM/Antifa "mainly peaceful" protests.
🤔
SW-User
People are not allowed to protest? They didnt beat up cops or destroy public property or try to hang the vice president of the US. Bring the hammer down alright, on trumps head.
