Why the change, Republicans?

In the 1950s, the Republican platform focused on social security, medical care, and building our country's infrastructure. Now if you bring up those topics to a Republican, you're some kind of commie pinko. (Does anyone actually say pinko anymore?) Why the change of heart, guys?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

deadgerbil · 22-25

Similar to how they were once the party of lincoln, but now waive confederate flags. The change the party went through is lost on them.

DunningKruger · 61-69, M

@deadgerbil Some of them actively deny there was a party switch. Look on Twitter at @kevinmkruse's responses to right-wing tool Dinesh D'Souza's tweets.

ViciDraco · 36-40, M

@DunningKruger @deadgerbil the switch was largely who was in the party. If you look at issues from the late nineteenth century through the mid twentieth you'll see a lot of divide in civil rights actually happened along a North/South division than a democrat/republican split. This was largely masked by the south having majority support for democrats and the north having majority support for republicans. But if you look at the exceptions of northern democrats and southern republicans, they were more likely to vote on civil issues based on geography rather than party.

Consolidation of party ideology nationwide didn't really happen until middle to end of twentieth century.

deadgerbil · 22-25

@DunningKruger it's unreal. They will also say that the KKK are democrats, when it's clear as day they are racially conservative, have always been that way, and have switched to the party that best reflects that.

LordShadowfire ·

@deadgerbil Anything to avoid responsibility, it seems.