This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultAsking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Is the left pro pedophile?

We know they support NAMBLA and they prefer the term Minor attracted person to Pedophile.

Now we hear that they are easing restrictions on convicted pedophiles, I mean "MAPS"
Top | New | Old
DogMan · 61-69, M
Pedophilia and the gay movement
T Sandfort
PMID: 3302030 DOI: 10.1300/j082v13n02_08
Abstract
A history of literature and views existing within the COC (Cultural and Recreational Center), the major Dutch organization of homosexual men and women, regarding pedophilia and its relationship to homosexuality are discussed, beginning with definite separation between the pedophile and homosexual identities andwith an abolishment of oppression towards pedophilia, for which the COC is in part responsible. The article argues that the homosexual identify is by no means a "constant" but a fluid identity, based on societal views and conditions. By accepting pedophilia, the COC hopefully will broaden the idea of the gay identity. ending
@DogMan LOL that paper was from DECADES ago!

That Sandfort article is a historical document from the 1980s, not a reflection of current LGBTQ+ beliefs.

It examines old debates within a Dutch group about pedophilia decades ago, and it does not endorse or normalize sexual abuse of children. The modern LGBTQ+ community overwhelmingly rejects pedophilia.

You're hilarious 😂
DogMan · 61-69, M
Commentary
The Left’s Appalling Efforts to ‘Normalize’ Pedophilia
Nicole Russell | November 18, 2021
|
Some on the left have made a concerted effort of late to “normalize” pedophilia by twisting language and shifting concern from would-be victims to the pedophile himself. That’s a dangerous precedent everyone must understand and confront.

In a Nov. 8 interview with the Prostasia Foundation, a San Francisco-based nonprofit organization purportedly dedicated to safeguarding kids, Allyn Walker offered various explanations and excuses for pedophiles—or as he calls them, “minor-attracted people.”

Walker, an assistant professor of sociology and criminal justice at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, said, “A lot of people when they hear the term ‘pedophile,’ they automatically assume that it means a sex offender, and that isn’t true, and it leads to a lot of misconceptions about attractions towards minors.”

The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

Walker, the author of the book “A Long, Dark Shadow: Minor-Attracted People and Their Pursuit of Dignity,” went on to explain the difference between a “minor-attracted person” and a pedophile by saying behavior should trump desire.

“From my perspective, there is no morality or immorality attached to attraction to anyone because no one can control who they’re attracted to at all,” Walker said. “In other words, it’s not who we’re attracted to that’s either OK or not OK. It’s our behaviors in responding to that attraction that are either OK or not OK.”

But that could easily become a slippery slope.

The interview garnered deserved outrage among conservative outlets, and Old Dominion University has placed Walker on administrative leave.
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
Who do you mean by "the left" here? As a leftist myself, I have not heard anyone actually advocating for this. I've only ever heard the right claiming this is a left position. If anything, the right has done more to protect pedos. Let's remember Roy Moore who was actually protected by the right. Or the calls by Republicans to allow child marriage.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
idontcareok · 70-79, M
@DogMan very true
@idontcareok Sure. This is real.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5565972-jeffries-grijalva-swearing-in-delay/.

And why is she not being sworn in? Because she can force the release of the Epstein files. The GOP (Guardians of Pedophiles) have literally shut down the government in order to prevent this.

I wonder why?
DogMan · 61-69, M
California Assembly passes bill allowing some pedophiles to not register as sex offenders, with stipulations
By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square Sep 3, 2020
Facebook
Twitter
Email

(The Center Square) – The California State Assembly this week voted to revise the state’s penal code that regulates the registration of sex offenders by passing SB-145. The revision of the bill would allow pedophiles to not be registered on the sex offender list as long as they are not 10 years older than the minor they were convicted of molesting.

The bill, introduced by Sen. Scott Wiener 18 months ago, relaxes sex offender registry requirements for sodomy and other acts with minors to reportedly end “discrimination against LGBTQ young people on the sex offender registry,” according to Wiener.
@DogMan LOL

Let’s get one thing straight about CA SB 145:

It does NOT legalize pedophilia. Not even close.

Here’s the truth: this law just gives judges discretion in certain cases involving minors 14–17, so that teens who are close in age to an older teen or young adult aren’t automatically putting someone on the sex offender registry. It’s about fairness in the legal system, not letting predators off the hook.

Sexual activity with kids under 14? Still illegal.
Judges can still require registration for dangerous offenders.
No one is saying “go molest kids.” That’s a lie.

This is classic misinformation from people trying to scare you. Don’t fall for it.
DogMan · 61-69, M
BY JASON RANTZ
Talk Show Host and Columnist at Seattle Red AM 770
Democrats prioritized a new bill that demands “person-first” language to address how violent sex offenders are labeled. The intent is to stop defining a sex offender by his or her crime, so they can destigmatize them. It may not even be the most offensive piece of the legislation.

Among the prescribed reforms, HB 2177 changes the name of the Sex Offender Policy Board (SOPB). If passed, it will now be called the Sex Offense Policy Board. It gives the dubious impression that the board reviews focuses on sex offenses, and not the criminals who commit them. HB 2177 also adds a convicted sex offender to the SOPB, with proponents arguing the felon’s “lived experiences” is “invaluable.” It does not restrict the membership to level 1 sex offenders, those who are least likely to recommit a sex offense. The bill allows the most dangerous felons, Level 3 sex offenders, to join. The sex offender will serve alongside another new representative to the board: victims of sex crimes.
DogMan · 61-69, M
Fact Check
Did California Pass a Law Protecting Pedophiles Who Rape Children?
A bill signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom leaves the decision whether individuals convicted of particular sex crimes involving minors must register as sex offenders to the discretion of the court.
David Emery
Published Feb. 28, 2019
@DogMan As I've already said.

SB 145 does NOT protect pedophiles.

It gives judges discretion in rare cases involving teens 14–17 who are close in age to the offender. Nothing more. Sexual abuse of kids under 14? Still illegal. Mandatory registration? Still on the table.

This is classic fear-mongering. Stop spreading lies. Pedophiles are not being protected.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
NAMBLA has donated their books about “sex education” to public libraries all over the country. I watched a news story about it on local news decades ago.
DogMan · 61-69, M
Pedophilia is now considered a sexual orientation by Organizations and academics in San Francisco.


How Pedophiles Are Being Normalized
Pedophilia as a recognized sexual orientation has gained relevance with a rising number of organizations and academics within the last decade alone.
@DogMan NO ONE has said that.

Pedophilia is NOT a sexual orientation. It’s a mental disorder, condemned by the American Psychiatric Association, and rejected by the LGBT community. Fringe groups in San Francisco don’t speak for anyone but themselves.

This has zero to do with SB 145, which is about judicial discretion for cases involving teens 14–17, not protecting predators or “normalizing” pedophilia. Stop spreading lies.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
“Attracted” softening it up seemingly like they would never act on their attractions and impulses. Yeah right, that’s pure BS right there.
PatKirby · M
Using a sneaky phrase like "Minor attracted person" instead of pedophile is kinda like using Elon Musk's phrase "rapid unscheduled disassembly" to describe a rocket exploding unexpectedly in midair. Makes it sound like something it isn't.
The left are weak.. they think numbers win the game, so they take in any stray group to boost the numbers..
The enemy of my enemy is mah friend..
so they accept pedis with open arms..

cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout I absolutely would not trust him to be alone with any child for 5 minutes much less work in a school or any other place where children are served.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
Ashley Biden's diary. Need we say more.
@MasterLee What about the diary. She wrote "
Showers w/my dad. Probably not appropriate"

Then wrote
I will forever have to deal with the fact that my personal journal can be viewed online… Repeatedly, I hear others grossly misinterpret my once-private writings and lob false accusations that defame my character and those of the people I love.”
no evidence of pedophilia there.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
PatKirby · M
@TexChik
^Bingo^

 
Post Comment