Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Latest in Ukraine

Ukraine is losing battles inside their borders. Zelenskyy could have kept all his soldiers in Ukraine, but he decided to split his army and send troops to invade Kursk oblast in Russia. It has been speculated that he did this to strengthen his position in future peace talks. Putin has sent soldiers from all over Russia to take back Kursk. He is also sending 100 Russian operatives from the “Bear Brigade” from Burkina Faso.

Russia looks set to take Pokrovsk and Chasiv Yar, two cities still partially under Ukrainian control.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
This war has been going on for over two and a half years now. And against not only a much bigger country, yet against a nuclear power at that.

I believe the Ukrainian government knows exactly what they are doing, to keep it up that long.

Scare tactics are not going to convince the rest of the world that Ukrainian government is wrong!

Scare tactics are the Russians game anyway.

And Zelenskyy isn't a military tactician. He's got generals for that. You're blaming the wrong person in any scenario.

Wars now days are not run by dictators any more. Like Putin could be an effective tactician as well! He as well has generals for that.

Same could be said of any countries leaders around the world.
emiliya · 22-25, F
@DeWayfarer USA was the first country to recognize Israel as a state. They were very close from the start. America has interests in the Middle East, and Israel is used to further those interests and influence. They also get to use their scientists and spies. How can anyone say that the Israeli project does not benefit US?

“The mistake was putting Israel IN THE MIDDLE EAST! Not a separate state where they would be slaughtered by the KKK.”

The KKK? Neo-Nazis look down on the KKK; they think they are ignorant. Neo-Nazis are heavily suppressed and law enforcement has them under surveillance, but they still talk sometimes.

I really don't think the KKK are a threat to anyone. Post WWII USA is very different to pre WWII USA, and that was already evident in 1948.

Have you seen all the Zionists in America? Why do you think it is Israel's best friend?

“The USA had no interests in the middle east! Had no claim to that territory what so ever. Actually had more claim to Libya since they were fighting the Germans there! But that's northern Africa! Not the middle East.”

They are interested in Middle Eastern oil, and consider the Middle East to be very strategically important. America did not want Russia to have more power and influence in this part of the world. They still don't. If it had no interest, Israel would not exist. Do you think it's there out of the kindness of America's heart? Why are they involved in the conflicts of this region if they have no interest? You just like to say things to contradict people. Is it an ego problem?
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@emiliya without the USA Israel wouldn't even exist! The UN really didn't want to! Only the USA pushed it!

The KKK was a MAJOR influence in 1948!
Not now! Even Martin Luther King was in the 1960s. And he was still shot. The civil rights movement didn't even start until the 1960s much less end because we are still, today, fighting for those same RIGHTS!

Your argument about the oil is irrelevant! There's is no oil in Israel! Nothing to influence! And even in Libya the USA gave them back their own oil. Which is still not the middle East.

My comment that I am defending!

I'm not on anyone else's comment!

That would be an ego trip!
JollyRoger · 70-79, M
@DeWayfarer I agree! Not that I have experienced Chinese culture, but having read a few James Clavell novels (Noble House, etc), stoic back-stabbing seems to be a social grace!
Richard65 · M
I think history has shown us that in most all conflicts/wars, nobody really knows what the fuck is going to happen, including nation leaders and military generals, and especially people on social media. The best laid plans of mice and men, and all that.

The Russians are supposed to be master tacticians, global experts at Chess, (etc...etc...) but Putin has inadvertently shown the weakness of the "mighty" Red Army. He's reduced to forcibly filling his ranks with scared conscripted kids and doesn't even have the decency to inform their mothers when they get their teenage heads blown off. The Ukranians hold national holidays to celebrate fêted old Nazis. The entire shit show doesn't belong in the 21st century, and hopefully this and the genocide in Gaza will be the last of their kind, if we don't all disappear in a nuclear conflagration first. Ukraine and the West had no right to overthrow a democratically elected leader in a coup and Putin had no right to invade a sovereign country. But here we are. If I believed in God I might think about getting on my knees.
emiliya · 22-25, F
@SpudMuffin “Red Army” was originally used to describe Bolshevik forces who fought against the anti-communist White armies. Stalin began to prefer the term “Soviets” as Russia was united in fighting the Nazis. It was then officially renamed.

Richard65 asked: “Putin has inadvertently shown the weakness of the "mighty" Red Army.”

Given that Russia is no longer fighting the White army, no longer communist, and is only one nation fighting another nation, do you think it is accurate to refer to our army as “Red Army?” Richard is 100 years late if he really means to refer to the Red Army, and 30+ years late if he is talking about the Soviet Army, which comprised different nations and was communist. What is red about Russian army now?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
emiliya · 22-25, F
@SpudMuffin We are no more criminal than any other army. There are many good men who get dragged into war. Some of them believe they are fighting for an honorable cause, that their country and its future is more important than their lives. As far as they are concerned, they are fighting for their homeland and doing what their grandfathers and great grandfathers did in WWII.
ididntknow · 51-55, M
Amazon Prime, UKRAINE ON FIRE, explains a lot about Ukraine, the history, the reason for the war, America’s involvement, the corruption, it was done by Oliver stone, the same man that made JFK, it’s a great education, Russia is not the aggressor here, America and the west are,
sree251 · 41-45, M
@ididntknow
you don’t seem to be open to learning, your views seem to be set in stone,

@MeisterAndrew is a strange bird. I cannot figure him out. He said he is South African (presumably white); and yet, he doesn't realize that the western bloc caused the downfall of the South African Government leading to the whites getting thrashed by the blacks. It was the same in Rhodesia now known as Zimbabwe. The western bloc practices a double standard. Why doesn't the western bloc support the overthrow of the whites in Australia and New Zealand?
MeisterAndrew · 41-45, M
@sree251 Shows why only knowing some of the facts is a dangerous thing. You sound like a white supremacist. Not everyone supported apartheid and the then nationalist government. It was something that was always going to end. Nobody overthrew the government. The problem came in with a deviation and compromise from what was originally envisioned in the freedom charter and not going for a fully open and democratic system but also not restricting who can take part. That is something that still has to be rectified which is inevitable with no party that will ever have a majority again and South Africa becoming increasingly federal.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JSul3 · 70-79
Send letters to Biden and Harris.
Demand that they allow Ukraine soldiers entering Russia to use USA supplied weapons.

If the US can supply Netanyahu with weapons, without restrictions, the same should apply to Zelenski.
emiliya · 22-25, F
@JSul3 It may not be the end. Civilization could continue in countries not affected by nuclear. It is still a dark thought, and I would prefer westerners to not be so cavalier about it. As a westerner who is neither from Ukraine nor Russia, this war should not be worth the potential of escalation to you. Why are some of you Americans so invested in Ukraine?

“Do you really believe that Putin does not have any dissidents in Russia?”

We don't have enough to fulfill your dream, your fantasy.

“If he dares step outside of Russia, I hope he is quickly arrested and charged with war crimes. That would be justice.”

Putin does step outside of Russia. He is visiting Mongolia this week, and they will not be arresting him.
ididntknow · 51-55, M
@JSul3 America are the only country to have ever used nuclear bombs in a war, think about that for a moment, before casting aspersions
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
I love when people talk about russia giving the far superior U.S. a hard time.
Even with the small “dead cat” bounce, russia finds themselves sanctioned by China this week. 😜
War is something you really should outgrow. On purpose.
War in Europe. That's the goal. You're winning. No stopping NATO.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JSul3 · 70-79
@emiliya OMG! Wake the hell up!

Austin says 'expectation' is Ukraine won't use US weapons outside its territory, despite Russian advance
Russia has made "tactical gains" in Kharkiv, a military expert told ABC News.

ByChris Boccia/ABC News

Despite the Russian advance, the defense secretary said U.S. weapons shouldn't be used beyond Ukrainian territory.

"Our expectation is that they continue to use the weapons that we provided on targets inside of Ukraine," Austin said.
ididntknow · 51-55, M
@JSul3 could you find some evidence that Putin did actually say that, or did you hear it on CNN
JSul3 · 70-79
@ididntknow
Atlantic Council
March 5, 2024

Putin is on an historic mission and will not stop until he is finally defeated

It’s long been known that Putin hankers for a lost age of Russian dominance over its neighbours. Calling the collapse of the USSR the “greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century” is one of his most-quoted (and most misunderstood) historical judgments.

In his speech, Putin reached back far further than the cold war to find his grievances. He stated clearly that the processes that led to Russia losing territory a century ago must be reversed. He pointed out what he said were catastrophic mistakes by the Bolsheviks in recognising Ukraine as a republic, and ceding land to end the war with Germany in 1918. He lamented the loss not of the Soviet Union, but of the “territory of the former Russian empire”.

Putin’s warped description of the way countries achieved their independence from Russian rule is aimed at Ukraine, but there is little in it that could not also be applied to Poland, Finland and the Baltic states.

Putin’s interpretation of history may be unrecognisable to the west, but it forms the framework for Russia’s current decisions and so cannot be ignored. This isn’t, of course, the first time Putin has said these things. But he has now removed all doubt that he is also intent on acting on them.

When Putin first launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, he initially sought to portray it as a defensive measure against “Ukrainian Nazis” and NATO expansion. However, as the conflict has unfolded, it has become increasingly apparent that the Kremlin is waging an old-fashioned colonial war of imperial expansion.

In summer 2022, Putin directly compared his invasion to the eighteenth century imperial conquests of Russian Czar Peter the Great. Months later, he proclaimed the annexation of four Ukrainian provinces while declaring them to be “historically Russian lands.” He has since asserted that “no Ukraine ever existed in the history of mankind,” and has issued orders for all traces of Ukrainian national identity to eradicated from areas of Ukraine under Kremlin control.

Putin’s historical motivations were perhaps most immediately obvious during his recent interview with American media personality Tucker Carlson. While Carlson openly encouraged Putin to blame NATO and the US for the invasion, the Russian ruler preferred to embark on a half-hour history lecture that placed the origins of the current war firmly in the distant past. Rather than seeking to justify his invasion in terms of contemporary geopolitics, Putin chose to argue that Ukraine was historically Russian and therefore a legitimate target.

Putin’s chilling dream of reclaiming “historically Russian lands” puts a large number of countries at risk of suffering the same fate as Ukraine. The Kremlin strongman is notorious for lamenting the collapse of the Soviet Union, but his revisionist ambitions actually extend beyond the boundaries of the former USSR. On numerous occasions, Putin has expressed his belief that the Soviet Union was in fact a continuation of the Russian Empire, while the fall of the USSR was “the disintegration of historical Russia.” “What had been built up over 1000 years was largely lost,” he commented in December 2021.

Based on this twisted logic, the historical arguments used by Putin to justify the invasion of Ukraine could be equally applied to any country that was once part of the Russian Empire. This would result in a list of potential targets including Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus, Poland, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and the whole of Central Asia, not to mention Alaska. Anyone tempted to dismiss the idea of Russia invading these countries should consider that just ten years ago, most Ukrainians were equally sure such things were impossible in the twenty-first century.

Nor is Putin solely motivated by his deep-seated desire to reverse Russia’s imperial decline. He also sees the invasion of Ukraine as a fight to end the era of Western dominance and establish a new multi-polar world order. After decades spent bristling at Russia’s reduced status and the perceived humiliations of the post-Soviet period, he is now attempting to frame the war in Ukraine as a battle against Pax Americana to shape the future of international relations. Putin believes victory over Ukraine would represent a decisive breakthrough that would undermine the entire post-1991 world order and reverse the verdict of the Cold War.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
emiliya · 22-25, F
@Ontheroad This made me laugh. We may not agree on certain matters, but I think you are an honest man who is also funny. За тебя!
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
emiliya · 22-25, F
@SW-User What is it with people from the UK? You all hate Russia. This has been going on since the Ochakov crisis, and certainly since the Russo-Turkish wars. The British used Russia when convenient and then dispensed with it when it was not convenient.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This message was deleted by its author.
emiliya · 22-25, F
@msros Gaza is not a war. It has no army and the majority being killed are civilians.

The war in Ukraine is not a stalemate; Russia has to win. The only question is how much they win, and when. I believe they are getting closer to a victory.
JSul3 · 70-79
@msros Over 40k killed in Gaza....now expanding to West Bank.
How many of these 40k are verified Hamas deaths vs innocent civilians?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Richard65 · M
@MarmeeMarch it'd be over if the Russian military was half way competent. But they ain't.
This message was deleted by its author.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment