Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Republicans and Ukraine conflict

I know that many brown shirt Republicans feel that NATO is bullying and threatening Russia over Ukraine and that Biden should be held for Treason because of what is happening in Ukraine so my questions are;

Following a Republican victory in the elections the decision is made to pull all military and financial support from the UN and Ukraine and to let Putin have Ukraine and allow the billions saved from Ukraine to be kept for the US.

In what way will pulling support for Ukraine benefit the US population, jobs and economy knowing that Putin has plans for the expansion of the greater Russian empire beyond Europes borders?

Serious answers only. Stupid responses will be deleted.
The republican fascists are now whining about the costs, and want to leave nato. They forgot that all nato allies payed for wars that America started without a cause.
justanothername · 51-55, M
@Thewhazzupdude There was Genocide in Kosovo ( it’s next door to Yogoslavia aka Croatia) the UN were there as observers, not the US.
@justanothername Indeed. The US left it alone. The UN or, a crippled part of Nato had to see for themselves. The US abandoned Nato back then already, cause there was no oil.
justanothername · 51-55, M
@Thewhazzupdude It wasn’t a US problem it’ was a European problem which is why the UN was there. Do you actually know what the Kosovo conflict was about?
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
It wouldn't and I say this as someone with a pretty cynical view of the conflict. The Republican line on this is partially true. Putin's invasion of Ukraine was a direct response to NATO enlargement and was (probably) entirely preventable.

This does not make Russia a good guy. Russia are explicitly villains who have invaded a sovereign country and are causing untold human harm.

All of this stuff is about geopolitical games between the billionaire class whether it be Russian or American oligarchs. There's always a lot of money to be made, but it's rarely money that goes to average working people since even if there's new economic activity, that money goes straight to the top.

What's interesting to me is that the Republicans taking a pro-Russia stance on this is the collapse of the decades-long bipartisan consensus on geopolitics which is very... destabilizing. Both political parties have always supported whatever wars are going on until Trump took office and now it appears that split is permanent.
justanothername · 51-55, M
@CountScrofula Natos build up at the time was in response to Putins rhetoric around invading Ukraine. EUROPE didn’t want another 1939 style Hitler invasion of Europe from Putin.
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
@justanothername Right sorry, I forgot that geopolitics are not complicated and they're very simple. There's a bad guy and he was gonna do just like Hitler (who was the baddest bad guy) and the good guys are stopping him and that's all there is to the story. My mistake.
justanothername · 51-55, M
@CountScrofula my point, and my understanding is that Putin has had an agenda for the past 10 years or so where it was his desire to turn Russia into the fortress it was under Peter the Great and Joseph Stalin. That fortress spread much further than the Russia of today. So regardless of whether Trump was at the helm or someone else it wasnt going to matter. Russia would be feared by the west under Putins rule.

That mind set is what NATO is up against.

A man who has no issues about sending millions of Russian men to their death on the battle field because that’s exactly what Stalin did when achieving a Greater Russia.
It won’t benefit anyone. Right now, the Ukrainians are doing our work for us by weakening Russia. It wouldn’t surprise me if Putin is channeling money to Republican PACs through the NRA and other front groups as they have done before.
BackyardShaman · 61-69, M
Pulling any level of support for Ukraine would be dangerous for the USA and the rest of the world. Trump desired to isolate the USA from NATO and the rest of the free world to further control the USA population. This is classic Narcissistic behavior, and DJT fits that profile. How much the GOP cuts off Ukraine I think will depend on whether DJT has the control over the GOP we see pre midterms. Once many of them are voted in, they may turn on DJT. They may no longer see a need for him since they got in on his supporters votes. It could go either way.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
PSSSST the brown shirts of German fame were all leftist socialists. Not unlike the New Democrats of Canada. Kind of an amalgam of marxists and corporatists. They were and are extremely racist and anti semitic as well
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@hippyjoe1955 [media=https://youtu.be/ovCf9VRLnDY]
@RodionRomanovitch Here's what dippyjoe keeps deleting in the other thread. To be fair, If I had said anything so idiotic, I'd probably want it deleted too, [b]LOL!!![/b]

Here's another sample of dippyjoe's idiot "science"



Special Bonus - Feed the Hungry!!



[sep][sep][center] UPDATE [/center] [sep][sep]
Dippyjoe: may I remind you that the words you describe as dog crap, the words you keep deleting are YOUR OWN WORDS!
[big]ROTFL!!![/big]
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@ElwoodBlues Wormwood you remind me of dog crap. Useless, Stinks to high heaven and you just can't get it off your shoe when you accidently step in it. Sadly you are not capable of refuting any of my posts. You claiming them false just proves they are correct. I only delete them so you don't embarrass yourself further.
Khenpal1 · M
It only exposes how week Russia is and China should pay attention. Republicans should be grateful to know what kinds of arms work and which do not. After all your guys spend a lot of tax money on it. Russia may team with China , so weak Russia should be in everyone interest.
WonderGirl · 36-40
@Khenpal1 Russia can't afford to arm all of its soldiers. it's pathetic.
Khenpal1 · M
@WonderGirl Russia can provide natural resources to China . In worst scenario 2 front war can start.
Human1000 · M
Republicans became anti-NATO as soon as their cult leader Trump decreed it so. Trump despises NATO in proportion to his admiration for Putin.
@hippyjoe1955 says [quote]The nazis were celebrated by the socialists[/quote]
FAKE HISTORY,[b] LOL!!![/b]
Ever heard of Volkswagen? Ever heard of I.G. Farben?? Fascists supported corporations and private capital!!

In Germany & Italy in the 1930s,
the fascists bitterly opposed the Social Democrats;
the fascists bitterly opposed the Socialists;
the fascists bitterly opposed the Trade Unionists;
and the fascists bitterly opposed the Communists.

When I say "bitterly opposed" it means the fascists sent brownshirt thugs to disrupt rallies and fight in the streets against their political opponents. The fascists were a reactionary party reacting against the left wing at the time. The fascists built their platform on racism, nationalism, and fear of the foreign.
billions is trifling. compared to the trillions that reagan and bush 41 spent in the 80s. If you love the war criminal then just confess it.
Like the population gets a say?
SW-User
I still don't understand how anyone was bullying Russia prior to the most recent invasion, or the 2014 Crimea annexation ... NATO certainly didn't shoot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 ... and NATO did not shoot down Korean Air Lines Flight 007 either ... if there is a pattern, it's not on the NATO side ...
Your deleting finger is about to get sore, lol. The brownshirts (or should I say redhats?) don't really have a good understanding of the situation. Some of them have told me Ukraine is the aggressor.
justanothername · 51-55, M
@LordShadowfire The replies have been very good thus far :)
justanothername · 51-55, M
@LordShadowfire it would appear that the brown shirts are too busy posting antagonist comments else where to bother about commenting on posts that they can’t answer.

 
Post Comment