@
MarkPaul The science of mRNA in vaccines is they it does not (that is, does not) interact with, or change, your genes in any way.
Hmmm...well that doesn't sound right. And you don't sound too confident. Let's see...does the DNA within the human body naturally contain the genetic instructions to produce the C19 spike protein? Why no, it does not. So how is it possible for a human being to create the C19 spike protein? By injecting a portion of the mRNA or DNA of the SARS-CoV-2 into the cytoplasm of human cells with the genes containing the instructions to produce the spike protein.
Ohhh, but it doesn't interact with your genes in anyway. 🙄 So you just copy or paraphrase what your handlers tell you without even thinking?
Now, how did the FDA define gene therapy?
"They can replace a gene that is missing or is causing a problem.
They can add genes to the body to help treat disease. (ding ding ding ding)
Or they can turn off genes that are causing problems.
To insert new genes directly into cells, scientists use a vehicle called a “vector.” Vectors are genetically engineered to deliver the necessary genes for treating the disease.
Vectors need to be able to efficiently deliver genetic material into cells, and there are different kinds of vectors. Viruses are currently the most commonly used vectors in gene therapies because they have a natural ability to deliver genetic material into cells. Before a virus can be used to carry therapeutic genes into human cells, it is modified to remove its ability to cause infectious disease.
Gene therapy can be used to modify cells inside or outside the body. When a gene therapy is used to modify cells inside the body, a doctor will inject the vector carrying the gene directly into the patient."
Damn, that sounds exactly like what the jab is doing. And a lot different than the way vaccines work which introduce a killed or attenuated virus into the body to produce the immuno response.
So, what requires more testing...vaccines or gene therapies? Given the jab was pushed out to the public after only 8 months of testing, you begin to understand why the gov't took liberties with how II to defined the covid jab.
Now, the problem is that you choose to establish mRNA as gene therapy which is social media circles suggests you are starting with a lie. In a court of law, we literally would refer to this as "leading the witness."
The problem is you are relying on social media for your definition of a gene therapy, and your quoted statement above doesn't even make sense. No one tried "to establish mRNA as gene therapy" If you had a basic understanding of biology, you'd understand just how stupid that sounds.
Leading the witness? 🤣🤣🤣. On to your next pretend career in law?