What evidence? You people have nothing so you grab hold of more nothing. I hope that is working well for you. We all know how much you enjoy being pissed off.
@SW-User I went there and found this. It's not bad, and seems to mention some of the things that the FBI did wrong during the investigation and the consequences of that. It also mentions how this will be used as leverage to modify Section 702 which is news to me, so thanks for sharing it.
Here's one I read on Substack that tends to focus on the propaganda of the Russian collusion narrative and how the Durham report adds further info that this was always bullshit.
@Carla bill barr stated on fox news a couple of nights ago that the investigation was not looking for criminal conduct. now you know. please, pickup your consolation prize on the way out.
@SumKindaMunster And it was later determined that Flynn didn't lie and was sent up by James Comey.
SW-User
Evidence of what? There's no 'evidence'! All he essentially said is: [i]I disagree with the way the FBI ran their investigation.[/i] (which is hardly surprising from a Trumpist Barr appointee).
It's yet another nothing burger, which the MAGA cult will wet their pants with delight over nonetheless. Feel free to take it as a win, though. God knows you people need a win 🤣
@SW-User I'm not going spoonfeed you something you already are primed to reject. I don't care if you choose to believe this or not.
What I do want you to know is that you are being fooled, and at some point you will realize that.
SW-User
@SumKindaMunster Fine, I'm indoctrinated. Anything I say to you that you don't agree with, I'm indoctrinated. For someone who claims to be fair and balanced, you brook no dissent, do you? But that is very much a YOU problem :)
I'd like to point out the commonality of those speaking out on this story. I've seen this response several times now:
3 separate people responded almost identically
[quote]What evidence?[/quote]
[quote]Evidence of what? There's no 'evidence'[/quote]
[quote]What evidence?[/quote]
This is the number 1 tactic of the MSM, "misdirection". As in focus on what seems to be important, but draws attention away from something that the media doesn't want exposed.
This allows followers to safely dismiss such revelations and feel comfortable about it.
As already stated to several, the key take away from the Durham report isn't evidence...its lack of evidence.
Specifically the lack of evidence proving the Russian collusion narrative, investigated in crossfire hurricane.
There will be no indictments, that's not what Durham was looking to do. Rather he exposed the clear and obvious bias exhibited by the FBI in investigating something that wasn't true and came from dubious sources.
The report also states the FBI took steps to rectify these deficiencies. These are not the actions of a bureau that is comfortable with what they did during this investigation.
They now look stupid and biased and their credibility has taken a hit.
That's what matters about this report. Not indictments. But revelations.
...and I didn't even mention how the FBI shut down an investigation into the Clinton Foundation due to political pressure! Ok...I just did...😉
SW-User
@SumKindaMunster [quote]As already stated to several, the key take away from the Durham report isn't evidence...its lack of evidence.[/quote]
Then perhaps the OP is the one misdirecting, as he was the one who was pissed off that the MSM wasn't giving Durham credit for the[b] "evidence".[/b]
@SW-User Fair enough. However it's not just in this post I am seeing this.
Another I keep seeing is "nothingburger". You think its a nothingburger?
SW-User
@SumKindaMunster Yes I do. All he's really doing is criticising the FBI, particularly as he does not recommend any wholesale changes to their procedures.
However, what I am worried about is the GOP pushing to limit the surveillance powers of the FBI, which will allow them to get away with far more should Trump be re-elected.
My guess is that they will recommend ditching Section 702 should Trump be elected, but will suddenly lose all interest in it should Biden be re-elected.
What credit should they give him? A consolation prize for not agreeing with the FBI conducting an investigation? He recommended no changes to their policies and procedures and recommended no indictments. There is nothing there to give him credit for.
@SW-User For those who are dense and deep in denial look no further that the Durham report that has been out for a couple weeks. Hillary didn't just know, she created the entire scenario, paid for the evidence to be planted (The Steele Dossier) with campaign funds , and informed obama and biden , in the oval office along with the head of the FBI, CIA, and the Attorney General. Jeeze are you so stuck in denial you can't read ?
SW-User
@TexChik The Durham report mentions nothing about Hillary Clinton "creating the entire scenario" whatever that means, or informing Obama and Biden. I don't know where you got THAT from, but it sure as hell wasn't the Durham report.
Of course they are. They don't want to admit they were sold a bunch of bullshit from the Clinton campaign and looked like smacked asses running around looking for evidence that didn't exist.
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout Why don't you just show us that part of the report stating this rather than this constructed meme? I'll hope for everyone that Durham will have to testify to congress just like Mueller did. It should be interesting.
