MSNBC : Not giving Durham credit ???
MSNNBC dismissing the evidence in Durham's Report????
51-55, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies 禄
SumKindaMunster 路 51-55, M
I'd like to point out the commonality of those speaking out on this story. I've seen this response several times now:
3 separate people responded almost identically
[quote]What evidence?[/quote]
[quote]Evidence of what? There's no 'evidence'[/quote]
[quote]What evidence?[/quote]
This is the number 1 tactic of the MSM, "misdirection". As in focus on what seems to be important, but draws attention away from something that the media doesn't want exposed.
This allows followers to safely dismiss such revelations and feel comfortable about it.
As already stated to several, the key take away from the Durham report isn't evidence...its lack of evidence.
Specifically the lack of evidence proving the Russian collusion narrative, investigated in crossfire hurricane.
There will be no indictments, that's not what Durham was looking to do. Rather he exposed the clear and obvious bias exhibited by the FBI in investigating something that wasn't true and came from dubious sources.
The report also states the FBI took steps to rectify these deficiencies. These are not the actions of a bureau that is comfortable with what they did during this investigation.
They now look stupid and biased and their credibility has taken a hit.
That's what matters about this report. Not indictments. But revelations.
...and I didn't even mention how the FBI shut down an investigation into the Clinton Foundation due to political pressure! Ok...I just did...馃槈
3 separate people responded almost identically
[quote]What evidence?[/quote]
[quote]Evidence of what? There's no 'evidence'[/quote]
[quote]What evidence?[/quote]
This is the number 1 tactic of the MSM, "misdirection". As in focus on what seems to be important, but draws attention away from something that the media doesn't want exposed.
This allows followers to safely dismiss such revelations and feel comfortable about it.
As already stated to several, the key take away from the Durham report isn't evidence...its lack of evidence.
Specifically the lack of evidence proving the Russian collusion narrative, investigated in crossfire hurricane.
There will be no indictments, that's not what Durham was looking to do. Rather he exposed the clear and obvious bias exhibited by the FBI in investigating something that wasn't true and came from dubious sources.
The report also states the FBI took steps to rectify these deficiencies. These are not the actions of a bureau that is comfortable with what they did during this investigation.
They now look stupid and biased and their credibility has taken a hit.
That's what matters about this report. Not indictments. But revelations.
...and I didn't even mention how the FBI shut down an investigation into the Clinton Foundation due to political pressure! Ok...I just did...馃槈
SW-User
@SumKindaMunster [quote]As already stated to several, the key take away from the Durham report isn't evidence...its lack of evidence.[/quote]
Then perhaps the OP is the one misdirecting, as he was the one who was pissed off that the MSM wasn't giving Durham credit for the[b] "evidence".[/b]
Then perhaps the OP is the one misdirecting, as he was the one who was pissed off that the MSM wasn't giving Durham credit for the[b] "evidence".[/b]
SumKindaMunster 路 51-55, M
@SW-User Fair enough. However it's not just in this post I am seeing this.
Another I keep seeing is "nothingburger". You think its a nothingburger?
Another I keep seeing is "nothingburger". You think its a nothingburger?
SW-User
@SumKindaMunster Yes I do. All he's really doing is criticising the FBI, particularly as he does not recommend any wholesale changes to their procedures.
However, what I am worried about is the GOP pushing to limit the surveillance powers of the FBI, which will allow them to get away with far more should Trump be re-elected.
My guess is that they will recommend ditching Section 702 should Trump be elected, but will suddenly lose all interest in it should Biden be re-elected.
However, what I am worried about is the GOP pushing to limit the surveillance powers of the FBI, which will allow them to get away with far more should Trump be re-elected.
My guess is that they will recommend ditching Section 702 should Trump be elected, but will suddenly lose all interest in it should Biden be re-elected.
