Have Mexican Drug Cartels Infiltrated US Politics, Possibly Even Elections? Sworn Testimony In Arizona Says ‘Yes’
The Arizona Legislature’s Senate Elections Committee and House Municipal Oversight & Elections Committee held a joint hearing on Thursday featuring testimony from several people involved in researching the voter disenfranchisement that occurred in 2020 and 2022. The testimony by Arizona forensic investigator Jacqueline Breger accused multiple statewide and county officials, including Governor Katie Hobbs and Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, of racketeering connected to the Sinaloa Cartel. Democrats on those committees refused to attend the hearing.
Breger said she has been working with a law firm investigating multistate racketeering and corruption but in the process, discovered election fraud as well. She said neither she nor the attorney she works for, John Harris Thayer of Harris/Thayer Law Corporation, are very political; he didn’t vote in the last two elections, and she is a registered independent. While investigating racketeering involving the Sinaloa Cartel, their team accidentally discovered election fraud, she said, including finding that Maricopa County’s database was being infiltrated from the outside.
– Manipulating elections since 2004 in Pima and Maricopa counties.
– infiltration of county databases
– bribes/infiltration affecting both local and wider election races and outcomes, including (but not limited to):
— principles at Runbeck Election Services
— Nov 3, 2020
election (Maricopa County recorder)
— Nov 8, 2022 election (governor, Secretary of State, and attorney general)
Public officials who have received bribes include multi-state office holders, state house and state senate, local office holders, county supervisors, judges in the Maricopa Supreme Court, judges of some city courts including two presiding judges, judges assistants, prosecutors within certain cities within Maricopa County, Prosecutors for Maricopa County, peripheral legal specialists including attorneys, approved mental health care providers (as in quarter pointed advisors), and related specialists.
In the Superior Court of Maricopa County, and Pinal County, and Pima County, at least 25 percent of the active judges have accepted bribes in exchange for protecting the racketeering activities. Bribe payments generally begin before the individual is even appointed to the bench. Bribes are usually paid as an incentive for the attorney to leave their private practice.
The fact that this ISN’T top-of-fold headline news tells you everything you need to know about who’s implicated in these allegations… which Breger is happy to back up with evidence — her document itself runs about 300 pages with approximately 3000 attachments, including source documents, title deeds, handwriting samples and all the other interesting things you might expect a financial fraud expert to be looking into.
The Democrats never showed up for this hearing for some reason.
Breger said she has been working with a law firm investigating multistate racketeering and corruption but in the process, discovered election fraud as well. She said neither she nor the attorney she works for, John Harris Thayer of Harris/Thayer Law Corporation, are very political; he didn’t vote in the last two elections, and she is a registered independent. While investigating racketeering involving the Sinaloa Cartel, their team accidentally discovered election fraud, she said, including finding that Maricopa County’s database was being infiltrated from the outside.
– Manipulating elections since 2004 in Pima and Maricopa counties.
– infiltration of county databases
– bribes/infiltration affecting both local and wider election races and outcomes, including (but not limited to):
— principles at Runbeck Election Services
— Nov 3, 2020
election (Maricopa County recorder)
— Nov 8, 2022 election (governor, Secretary of State, and attorney general)
Public officials who have received bribes include multi-state office holders, state house and state senate, local office holders, county supervisors, judges in the Maricopa Supreme Court, judges of some city courts including two presiding judges, judges assistants, prosecutors within certain cities within Maricopa County, Prosecutors for Maricopa County, peripheral legal specialists including attorneys, approved mental health care providers (as in quarter pointed advisors), and related specialists.
In the Superior Court of Maricopa County, and Pinal County, and Pima County, at least 25 percent of the active judges have accepted bribes in exchange for protecting the racketeering activities. Bribe payments generally begin before the individual is even appointed to the bench. Bribes are usually paid as an incentive for the attorney to leave their private practice.
The fact that this ISN’T top-of-fold headline news tells you everything you need to know about who’s implicated in these allegations… which Breger is happy to back up with evidence — her document itself runs about 300 pages with approximately 3000 attachments, including source documents, title deeds, handwriting samples and all the other interesting things you might expect a financial fraud expert to be looking into.
The Democrats never showed up for this hearing for some reason.
70-79, M
