Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

If we had the option to close our inbox to private messages, would you choose to close it?

Poll - Total Votes: 20
Yes
No
Show Results
You can only vote on one answer.
I don’t mean like close it permanently, just to have an option to stop incoming messages for as long as you want. Like your whiteboard.
Top | New | Old
CelticGal · 18-21, F
As a girl, sometimes it would be useful to prevent some unwanted messages or simply to take a break from inbox flooding.

I don't always have time to answer and I hate to leave messages unanswered. It is a matter of courtesy.
I relate to you but not from the standpoint of responding is a matter of courtesy.. I don’t owe anyone anything. @CelticGal
CelticGal · 18-21, F
@deathfairy That's also true. Those are basically uninvited guests.
I wouldn't need to as I don't engage in much private messaging anyway. That said, I think it would be a good option. People should be able to be here whilst also being left alone.
I already have it set that way. But because I have that folder I still see those messages, and sometimes someone I actually have interacted with gets filtered into there when they reach out to me.

I would like to just remove that entire possibility and stay in public interactions only. @ostfuidctyvm
@deathfairy I'm totally on board and I'd vote for that change. I think it would be a useful protection for people. It's easy to say just block but then they need to provide unlimited blocks regardless of VIP.
Exactly.. and for VIP to also be limited is kinda crazy to me, but i understand they have reasons and a system for how things work. Not dissing it, just idk. @ostfuidctyvm
PerfectionOfTheHeart · 46-50, F
There’s been times where I’ve wanted to just do that. No reaching out to me whatsoever so I can just comment or browse in peace. Plus, there’s those who only message me when they see I’m active. That’s another level of nu uh.
Ugh.. I have experienced that too, that’s online stalking pretty much..

Nuno said they are really reluctant to allow users to close their inboxes. Not sure why.

If they just had a redirect when someone tried to message us to a page saying “this user isn’t accepting messages at this time” it would solve any lost messages, or a hey I sent you a message but you never saw it” even from friends. And obviously the main thing: we won’t get creepy messages to deal with. To be forced to ignore. Like we are emotionless and can just walk away without being affected. @PerfectionOfTheHeart
PerfectionOfTheHeart · 46-50, F
@deathfairy
“this user isn’t accepting messages at this time”

That’s actually a perfect message for the break from it. It’s clean and respectful.

Most of my creepy messages go straight to my requests folder thanks to my settings. My number only lights up when I get messages from those I actually enjoy conversing with. And when I do check the requests folder, they tend to get archived without a second thought. It’s a couple steps to retain my peace, but it’s no biggie to me. I think I checked a week back or so and I had nearly 500 message threads archived, which is a crap ton of creeps over the year. Still far fewer than some women get here.

And when I have an inbox where the cool people have gone silent and I’m left with the eh ones, I’ll send them straight to ignore so they don’t light up my inbox. It’s my way of being blissfully unbothered 😌
779625b · New
I ignore what I need to. I speak to some mostly through there though and dont feel pressured to answer. Sounds like a good option though
I understand, it would be optional, and not permanent..

Ignoring works only to a certain point. @779625b
779625b · New
@deathfairy Yeajh x
ineedadrink · 56-60, M
It is not an issue for me as a older guy. Occasionally I get a message from some unknown, usually says "hi, how are you". Ignore, maybe block. But obviously it's quite a bit different for women.
No. For me, messages are where real connection happens, but I know it's the opposite for you.
Yeah because ur a man, and most men want the inboxes to stay open, but women want the ability to close them or open them when we want.. @NudasPriest
@deathfairy For me it's because I'm fairly private in public, but I've made some lifelong friends in messages.
🙂‍↕ I am glad for you. @NudasPriest
HelloItsMeAgain · 26-30, FNew
Oh heck yeah!! Sometimes, I am just in the mood to doom scroll. I may engage in posts and make posts while doing so...Sometimes, I am just not in the mood to have a long winded convo in my inbox.🤣🤣
I wish we could just close it and the person trying to message me would see something like “this user isn’t accepting private messages at this time” @HelloItsMeAgain
HelloItsMeAgain · 26-30, FNew
@deathfairy Omgg, right?! If, only!
SpectralMourning · 41-45, M
No I like getting a message sometimes. But I've never had to even remotely close deal with a flooded inbox.
SpectralMourning · 41-45, M
@deathfairy I think they gave that option to the whiteboard because it displays publicly on the profile. For a private inbox they'd probably just tell you to ignore it if you don't want private conversations. But perhaps you're one of those that would further descend into the darkest depths of insanity seeing that notification flag keep getting larger and larger.
I literally can’t have any number badge accumulating for messages, notifications, I keep it empty at all times.

It’s not even that. It’s the actual messages themselves. @SpectralMourning
SpectralMourning · 41-45, M
@deathfairy I'm sorry...I do get wanting it all to just be an empty clean slate.
Keeper · M
I’ve got bouncers at the door — IDs checked, fish weighed on arrival, and all diapers, spanking devices and feeding supplies are subject to inspection and checked at the door.

Your “M” is already the very deterrent to not recieve the messages i am talking about.

I don’t even add my gender and it still doesn’t always help. @Keeper
Keeper · M
I probably wouldn’t choose to close it as I’m about as popular as a fart in an elevator but I think it would be a very useful option for people to have.
You’re not unpopular.. I was just admiring your username earlier. I should have said something.

But I agree 🥺 @OlderSometimesWiser
emmasfriend · 46-50, F
Just ignore the messages you don't like.

There is an option to restrict the type of sender.
emmasfriend · 46-50, F
@deathfairy
If you do not reply they cannot send another
I don’t reply, but they keep coming from new accounts… I never ever reply, I don’t even open them.

You’re obviously an alt and not actually helping.

I am beyond ignoring them, not messaging them back, I want to just close the loop. @emmasfriend
emmasfriend · 46-50, F
@deathfairy
Sorry, only trying to be helpful
i rarely use pms here these days, but i wouldn’t get rid of it because i like having the option to message if someone needs me
You can open and close it whenever you want. Like your whiteboard.. 🥲

Not like REMOVING IT FOREVER. @poisonouscupcake
@deathfairy ahhhh i get that, that would be a nice option i think😺
Kiesel · 56-60, M
I would like a close to all 'except these people' option
Wow that’s like a whole separate layer to it. Like true customization and I don’t know if they would actually be able to allow that. I just want a on and off switch. @Bexsy
@deathfairy I know, I ask a lot :/
Selah ·
Sure. I don't get messages anyway.
I would even choose to close it if the only option was to close it permanently and irreversibly. @Selah
Magenta · F
Yes.
But maybe open it on occasion.
Me too..

According to the poll, most ppl who complain about the messages they receive. But when presented with an actual solution to it, they wouldn’t go for it. @Magenta
Magenta · F
@deathfairy Indeed. I'm happy when I don't have messages to open, ha!
I like the freedom of just doing my own thing without all that shallow interaction that can become exhausting.
Exactly, and in most of my experience, private messaging is where most friendships go to die. Literally. @Magenta
StygianKohlrabi · 46-50, M
yes. sometimes I feel like a piece of meat. 🍖

 
Post Comment