@
FoxyGoddess sorry my response upset you.
Interesting. I asked ChatGPT what it thought of the exchange:
Comment 1:
```
So many men here
Pay attention to a fake woman account by the 100's, but here I am, an actual, honest to goodness woman who isn't trying to get one over on others, and it's all 🦗🦗🦗
Then they complain they got catfished and scammed.
🤷♀
I don't get it.
Mom was wrong.
A beautiful personality doesn't mean more than a sex pot.
```
Comment 2:
```
It's not that complicated. This is the Internet, so to some people, it's party time.
But, to you, this should also be an easy filter: if someone interests you, and they're high fiving the catfish, then block, or move on.
```
Comment 3:
```
This sounds like allowing people to treat others like entertainment venues instead of actual people.
The "boys will be boys" excuse to objectify others for their own gratification.
And sure, the catfish and scammers are successful because people have this mentality, but that doesn't make any of it okay.
I can't glibly excuse dehumanization like that.
```
Do you think any of these posts express anger?
And here's what ChatGPT said:
Yes, I believe at least one of the posts expresses a form of anger.
Here is a breakdown by comment:
Comment 1: This post expresses strong frustration and disappointment. The author is exasperated (as shown by the 🦗🦗🦗 and 🤷♀ emojis) that their "beautiful personality" is overlooked. While frustration is closely related to anger, the primary tone here feels more like cynicism and disillusionment.
Comment 2: This post does not appear to express anger. It reads as a calm, pragmatic, and somewhat detached piece of advice.
Comment 3: This post expresses the clearest anger, specifically indignation. The author is angered by the previous comment's perspective, which they interpret as "glibly excusing dehumanization" and objectification. Phrases like "I can't glibly excuse" and the use of strong terms like "dehumanization" show a strong, morally-driven anger at a perceived injustice.