Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I bought a wall clock with Roman numerals.. Next up; learn how to read Roman numerals 🥔😚

Top | New | Old
You already understand Roman numerals enough to hang the clock the right side up, so you're on the right track. (Not that I expected anything else of course.)
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@NerdyPotato

A superior potato always knows the right track intuitively.
BittersweetPotato · 31-35, F
@NerdyPotato I used my smarts and superiority 🥔🥴
Zaphod42 · 51-55, M
I for one, love Roman numerals!
Come to think of it, so does my GF…most of her bags have the Roman numerals for 55 on them 😅
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@Zaphod42

I got this one on sale... only $995. 🙂

This is when I really feel old; when I was a kid, along with cursive writing, the Baltimore Catechism, Roman numerals and very basic Latin were part of the curriculum in many Catholic schools.
Elessar · 31-35, M
I: 1
V: 5
X: 10
(The other digits aren't relevant in a clock)
L: 50
C: 100
D: 500
M: 1000

If one smaller digit appear before a bigger one you subtract it:
IV = -1 +5 = 4

Otherwise, you add:
VII = +5 +1 +1 = 7
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@Elessar

Why does he have lettuce leaves on his head though?
Elessar · 31-35, M
@basilfawlty89 Just in case you have to cook a pork lamb and you're suddenly out of laurel
DrWatson · 70-79, M
@Elessar

I'll add a note about a little oddity regarding traditional clocks.

The Romans originally wrote the number four as IIII. Eventually, they developed the subtraction convention and wrote it IV.

Although it is inconsistent to do so, a traditional clockface uses IIII for four, but it uses IX for nine (rather than VIIII).

I have occasionally seen a clock with "IV", and that is a giveaway that the clock is newer, and not an antique. In fact, I just did a google search for "Roman numeral clockface" and found "IV" well-represented. Proof that digital images are not antiques! 😄

Also an indication that "doing your own research" online can be misleading!
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
I'll help.
Can we have a drink first?
I'll have a Martinus.
cherokeepatti · 70-79, F
I have an aversion to clocks and watches with Roman numerals. Won’t have them despite knowing how to read them.
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
Don't ask Degs... he failed Latin.

Three times. 🤭
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
DrWatson · 70-79, M
I want a digital clock with an LED display in Roman numerals!
It’s V past IX.
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@DrWatson

Depicting it as in the movie makes for good entertainment, but I doubt that in real life Churchill was unaware of the meaning. He more likely meant "up yours, Hitler" in that photo, and then turned the V around for more polite occasions.
DrWatson · 70-79, M
@Thinkerbell Yes, I would agree that Churchill's personality was such that he would not shy away from using such a gesture. On the other hand, when I have seen British people give the gesture, it is somewhat different: the two fingers together and thrust upward forcibly in an "f - u" motion. The more passively presented "open V" was apparently the version used on the Continent.

At any rate, yes, poetic license is employed quite a bit in movies. I thought it was a great scene! lol
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@DrWatson

Maybe there are regional differences in the UK as to how close together the fingers are.

As for the upward thrust, it's possible that in the photo, Churchill had indeed made it, but without video we'll never know.

https://stronglang.wordpress.com/2015/10/08/up-yours-the-gesture-that-divides-america-and-the-uk/
**Tries to look but gets distracted by that sky...**
Captainjackass · 31-35, M
*sneakily rotates it sideways*
Degbeme · 70-79, M
Degbeme · 70-79, M
@BittersweetPotato 🤷‍♂
BittersweetPotato · 31-35, F
@Degbeme 🥔😭🥔😭
Degbeme · 70-79, M
@BittersweetPotato *drinks coffee*

 
Post Comment