Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Deeana081971 · F
Some brands are smaller in coverage which is not so bad sometimes. lol
You should see the picture my grandma showed me back in the 70’s and 80’s lmaooo they were a lot smaller
exexec · 61-69, C
My wife had small ones years ago, but she wouldn't wear them in public like they do now.
ozgirl512 · 26-30, F
Not in price... There's some sort of inverse square law at work there🤔
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
jackson55 · M
3. Bandaids. Cheaper too.
jackson55 · M
@Deeana081971 No argument from me.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Deeana081971 and, more fun
SW-User
@Deeana081971 Definitely!
smileylovesgaming · 31-35, F
They do seem smaller these days
MarineBob · 56-60, M
Who's complaining ?.
They show more butt
JestAJester · 31-35, M
And XXL, XL, and L are always sold out. Why are they sold in those sizes again?
Larger women are allowed to go swimming too lol wtf @JestAJester
JestAJester · 31-35, M
@666Maggotz sure they are. Just preferably not in bikinis that barely cover anything. Would you wanna see a fat man in a speedo?
Pfuzylogic · M
Thongs were never a thing before and the tops expose the bottoms of the breasts.
Jimmy2016 · 61-69, M
🤔.......They are half of the size of what they use to be and twice as expensive.........
Chelsiegirl · 46-50, T
I still like one pieces.. but some bikinis are cute.
GerOttman · 61-69, M
I think the girls are just bigger now
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
They have gone up
a few sizes it seems
a few sizes it seems
justanothername · 51-55, M
Still the sane size. It’s a good thing.
lipstickguy · 61-69, M
no I just got bigger
wetncthru · F
Just many more options!
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
🤔
jackson55 · M
@wildbill83 Pay more, get less.