Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Deeana081971 · F
Some brands are smaller in coverage which is not so bad sometimes. lol
666Maggotz · F
You should see the picture my grandma showed me back in the 70’s and 80’s lmaooo they were a lot smaller
exexec · 70-79, C
My wife had small ones years ago, but she wouldn't wear them in public like they do now.
ozgirl512 · 26-30, F
Not in price... There's some sort of inverse square law at work there🤔
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
jackson55 · M
3. Bandaids. Cheaper too.
jackson55 · M
@Deeana081971 No argument from me.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Deeana081971 and, more fun
SW-User
@Deeana081971 Definitely!
smileylovesgaming · 31-35, F
They do seem smaller these days
MarineBob · 56-60, M
Who's complaining ?.
They show more butt
JestAJester · 31-35, M
And XXL, XL, and L are always sold out. Why are they sold in those sizes again?
666Maggotz · F
Larger women are allowed to go swimming too lol wtf @JestAJester
JestAJester · 31-35, M
@666Maggotz sure they are. Just preferably not in bikinis that barely cover anything. Would you wanna see a fat man in a speedo?
Pfuzylogic · M
Thongs were never a thing before and the tops expose the bottoms of the breasts.
Jimmy2016 · 61-69, M
🤔.......They are half of the size of what they use to be and twice as expensive.........
Chelsiegirl · 46-50, T
I still like one pieces.. but some bikinis are cute.
GerOttman · 61-69, M
I think the girls are just bigger now
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
They have gone up
a few sizes it seems
a few sizes it seems
justanothername · 51-55, M
Still the sane size. It’s a good thing.
lipstickguy · 61-69, M
no I just got bigger
wetncthru · F
Just many more options!
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
🤔
jackson55 · M
@wildbill83 Pay more, get less.