AbbeyRhode · F
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@AbbeyRhode [media=https://youtu.be/xV0HF1Ao2Ho]
cherokeepatti · 70-79, F
@AbbeyRhode It seems to be a scam and criminal enterprise in which they do their damndest to weasel their way into elected offices and government agencies.
TexChik · F
Democrat activist judges letting violent criminals out on bail or released entirely before trial , who then go out and reoffend. That is a violation of the public trust and those judges trying to subvert the Criminal Justice System via judicial activism should become part of the criminal justice system for a period of no less than 12 years, while also being disbarred and paying a substantial fine.
View 9 more replies »
Mindful · 56-60, F
@Royricky09 thank you for your words of encouragement.
I don't actually want anyone to be arrested for being wealthy. That's crazy - which you are pointing out. I agree. I admire people for who they are. As long as they are ethical I'm okay with wealth.
Curious- you must run your own business? My husband does too. For whatever reason as hard as he works he won't be a billionaire but does make ends meet. What is it that you do?
I don't actually want anyone to be arrested for being wealthy. That's crazy - which you are pointing out. I agree. I admire people for who they are. As long as they are ethical I'm okay with wealth.
Curious- you must run your own business? My husband does too. For whatever reason as hard as he works he won't be a billionaire but does make ends meet. What is it that you do?
@Royricky09 and onlyfans type sites
cherokeepatti · 70-79, F
@Royricky09 Children in beauty pageants. After Jon Benet Ramsey died I wondered why it continued. Nothing but events to attract pedos to those children.
jackrabbit10 · M
Airplanes that have no mufflers, header pipes running Strate from the engine block, hear them 15 miles in a circle.
Slicker1962 · 26-30, MNew
Farting in a crowded elevator.
TheSirfurryanimalWales · 61-69, M
Cancelling buses when I’m already at the bus stop….it’s been a bad week!
Those speeding escooters that go stupidly fast.
nobodyishome · 31-35, F
@BritishFailedAesthetic Once I put myself on an effing 360 roller coaster. Never again. An indoor roller coaster is best. Once was on in Malaysia.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
Weed
jackrabbit10 · M
@MasterLee come to Tennessee lite up a joint. if you don't have a medical card, you get a fine or jail time,
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@jackrabbit10 just don't do it in public
jackrabbit10 · M
@MasterLee yell I know. did it for 30 years.
nobodyishome · 31-35, F
Wanting to know the gender of your fetus should not be illegal. I mean people should get to decide if they want something or no. If they dont want a girl, that means they cant take care of one. Simple :)
HumanEarth · F
The Patriot Act
nobodyishome · 31-35, F
@HumanEarth What is that 🤩
HumanEarth · F
(This from a on-line search)
The USA PATRIOT Act, enacted October 26, 2001, expanded U.S. intelligence and law‑enforcement powers to prevent terrorism by amending statutes including FISA and criminal and surveillance laws. It created or broadened authorities such as roving wiretaps that follow a suspect across devices without new orders; business‑records orders (Section 215) allowing secret collection of third‑party “tangible things” like phone or library records; expanded pen‑register/trap‑and‑trace powers under FISA for dialing and routing data; National Security Letters (NSLs) permitting administrative subpoenas for phone, financial, credit and internet‑service records often issued with gag orders; and easier information‑sharing between intelligence and law‑enforcement agencies by lowering barriers that previously separated foreign‑intelligence and criminal investigations.
Those changes affected rights and privacy by narrowing Fourth Amendment protections in some surveillance contexts—allowing secret court orders with a lower showing than traditional probable cause and enabling broad or bulk collection practices—while increasing secret, ex parte proceedings in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and limiting adversarial review and public oversight. The Act raised First Amendment concerns by exposing library and reading records and imposing gag orders that chilled association and restricted recipients from disclosing or publicly challenging orders, and it reduced notice and due‑process protections because targets and third parties often received no notice and had limited ability to contest collection.
By relying heavily on third‑party records held by telecoms, ISPs, banks and others, the law effectively lowered expectations of privacy for data held outside an individual’s direct control; mass metadata collection revealed by Edward Snowden in 2013 highlighted those practices and provoked legal challenges and reform. Courts have found some practices and NSL nondisclosure provisions unconstitutional, ruled certain bulk collection unlawful, and Congress has since narrowed some authorities; nevertheless, other powers (like roving wiretaps and many FISA authorities) have persisted subject to reauthorizations, court review, and ongoing legislative debate.
The USA PATRIOT Act, enacted October 26, 2001, expanded U.S. intelligence and law‑enforcement powers to prevent terrorism by amending statutes including FISA and criminal and surveillance laws. It created or broadened authorities such as roving wiretaps that follow a suspect across devices without new orders; business‑records orders (Section 215) allowing secret collection of third‑party “tangible things” like phone or library records; expanded pen‑register/trap‑and‑trace powers under FISA for dialing and routing data; National Security Letters (NSLs) permitting administrative subpoenas for phone, financial, credit and internet‑service records often issued with gag orders; and easier information‑sharing between intelligence and law‑enforcement agencies by lowering barriers that previously separated foreign‑intelligence and criminal investigations.
Those changes affected rights and privacy by narrowing Fourth Amendment protections in some surveillance contexts—allowing secret court orders with a lower showing than traditional probable cause and enabling broad or bulk collection practices—while increasing secret, ex parte proceedings in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and limiting adversarial review and public oversight. The Act raised First Amendment concerns by exposing library and reading records and imposing gag orders that chilled association and restricted recipients from disclosing or publicly challenging orders, and it reduced notice and due‑process protections because targets and third parties often received no notice and had limited ability to contest collection.
By relying heavily on third‑party records held by telecoms, ISPs, banks and others, the law effectively lowered expectations of privacy for data held outside an individual’s direct control; mass metadata collection revealed by Edward Snowden in 2013 highlighted those practices and provoked legal challenges and reform. Courts have found some practices and NSL nondisclosure provisions unconstitutional, ruled certain bulk collection unlawful, and Congress has since narrowed some authorities; nevertheless, other powers (like roving wiretaps and many FISA authorities) have persisted subject to reauthorizations, court review, and ongoing legislative debate.
nobodyishome · 31-35, F
@HumanEarth Well, is okay, i think, when done by ridiculously professional people :)
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
Teirdalin · 31-35
For the USA specifically, Presidents over the age of 70.
Just retire.
Just retire.
BiasForAction · M
Texts from scammers
nobodyishome · 31-35, F
Running after folks who are not compatible with you
shuhak · M
Stupidity
nobodyishome · 31-35, F
@shuhak calling people stupid
nobodyishome · 31-35, F
@empanadas No, is for my Allah 🤩