Matriarchy ?

Beware . History repeats :)

@BoldSam: Yeah? And if it tries to repeat in that way, that's when people should start throwing punches.

@BoldSam: I hope not while I'm alive. Lol

@BlueMetalChick: The war between the Matriarchs and Patriarchs was the most violent event in this world’s history. The triumphant women’s priority was building the world matriarchy.

@BoldSam: Uh, I dunno what planet you live on, but it must not be Earth.

@BlueMetalChick: the days are yet to come in this very same planet . Not because women are pushing towards it but because males crave for it .

@BoldSam: Did you guzzle lead paint as a child?

@BlueMetalChick:
Masculine hubris hid fragility. Most male egos collapsed .
On this gynarchic world, all men serve womankind.Men must be useful .Men are conditioned to convey humility in posture, movement and facial expression.

@BoldSam: This has never happened in world history and this never will happen. Keep dreaming, you nutjob.

Historians will call this age “The End of Masculinity.” The world’s entire male population was made obedient . Inculcating humility and obedience was a priority. Men must accept their new status – permanent status – as servitors.@BlueMetalChick:

@BoldSam: No they will not. Because it isn't going to happen. Men don't want to be obedient. And I'm pretty sure women don't want them to be either.

@BlueMetalChick: But wait and watch ...
The men of matriarchal world would always be humble and grateful . And women would be more than willing to guide them using their superior intelligence.

@BoldSam: There's always going to be a certain number of men who are submissive and wish to be subservient to a woman, especially in a sexual way. If there weren't, then dominatrix would not exist. But if you actually believe that women are going to "tame' men on a global scale, or even a national scale, you need to lay off the crack pipe and go see a proctologist to get your head removed from your own rectum.

@BlueMetalChick: If you look at Female led relationships (FLR) it looks like the safest relationship a woman can have. She makes the rules, she sets the boundaries, she has final say and he both loves her and supports her in her role. In any other relationship, women do not enjoy that kind of freedom or safety. This is a functional model for any woman who wants more control and less strife. There should be zero downside to female led relationships when entered into with open eyes and a whole heart between two people who love each other.

@BoldSam: That's not a relationship, that's one person holding power over another. And it's wrong. If you want more control and less strife, stay single. Same goes for men. It's a better life, and you're not being a parasite. There will always be a downside to relationships with a leader.

@BlueMetalChick: just another dreamer, i surpose we should let her have it, it is a new year🙂

@BlueMetalChick: if the traditional vanilla type of relationship is what you tend to call an ideal relationship let me point out that majority of those relationships are ending up in divorce / breakups . Why ? Just because a 50-50 can never successfully exist . There has to be one leader and it's proven fact that a woman is a better leader .

FLR is a "designer" relationship in that the couple comes together and says "this is what we want" as a couple. Couples often change roles promoting the woman to head of household and the man to a more supportive role. Often the woman become the family authority figure and final decision maker. In other words the couple decides what wife led relation means. Men often take on more household chores, serve their mates as a stay at home mom might for her husband. But there is a twist and discovering that twist make all the difference in the world.

@BoldSam: "Vanilla" relationships aren't ideal because they're still romantic or sexual relationships, which are never ideal. A relationship like that will always fail, whether equal or led by a man or woman.

"FLR" is not a relationship. It's a fucked up and unrealistic fantasy that isn't going to become a reality.

@BlueMetalChick: May be the reasons why you are against FLR is mainly because of the pride and shame associated with it . All these are created by the patriarch oval society and we need to think beyond that ...
Many women become interested in FLR by witnessing their girlfriend's male behave in a lovable, completely deferential manner, in acceptance and respect of her femininity and authority. When they ask for an explanation, their friend is usually glad to describe her experiences with FLR and obedience, and how she has learned to love his submission and its many benefits.
Indeed it is highly therapeutic for a male to sit silently while his wife or girlfriend proudly discloses the most intimate details of his subordination, among the usual girlish giggles and laughter, as if showing off her latest brand purse.
The male is usually very tense when his subservience is being publicly discussed, especially when in the presence of other males.
After the fact, however, many women notice a definite softening in their male's mannerism and behavior, which is quite pleasant. Though most women ignore the psychological mechanisms at play most intuitively understand that showing off their male's passivity enhances his behavior.

Interestingly, the tension vanishes after a male's condition has been exposed a few times before the same individuals. All is out in the open now, and he has nothing further to fear from the group.

@BlueMetalChick: Female led relationships exist. They are a reality and not a fantasy. Women lead their submissive boyfriends or husbands and excert a caring dominance over them. These relationships have a much higher chance to be successful and to last forever than vanilla relationships.

@Mugin16: Female led relationships exist. Yeah, no shit. But are you not understanding that this person wants all relationships on planet fucking Earth to be female led, and induced by some kind of stupefying drugs and manipulation?

@BoldSam: That's not therapeutic, that's a violation of trust and blatantly intentional cruelty. If she does that, he should beat her fucking face in. And if he does that to her, she should do the same. You don't "disclose the most intimate details" of any part of a person's life without their consent. That's not love. That's harmful and cowardly.

What you basically want to do is abuse and berate people until they have too low self esteem to stand up for themselves. That's absolutely fucking appalling.

Again this is nature's way of allowing us to navigate the social landscape creating alliances and avoiding ostracism and isolation, an event which evolutionarily had a high rate of fatality.
Male training is based on exploiting existing emotions, not changing them or blocking them, as this is never possible. Emotions allow us to interact directly with lower brain layers and bypass the rational mind. Controlling a persons emotions means controlling his behavior.

@BoldSam: That was honestly one of the most vague, ambiguous, and meaningless statements I've read in a very long time.

What the shit is "male training?" Are you just making things up now?

And why the fuck would you think it's acceptable to control someone else's behavior? Unless you're a parent and you're trying to keep your child from misbehaving, because they don't know any better, then you haven't got any right to control someone's behavior.

@BlueMetalChick: ok to explain you the significance of this training it is important that you believe this is extremely beneficial for both the man and the woman . With very few exceptions, almost all males who decide to diligently submit to the necessary training and enter a role of worshipful service to their women report increased levels of satisfaction with their life, and a sense of purpose which was previously absent. When your male starts to acquire those desirable habits which make him worthy of your affection and admiration, and of your friends' envy, both of you will know it was more than worth it .