Top | Newest First | Oldest First
everyone with an open mind knows the all the makers of mRNA covid vaccines have openly lied about the design/contents of the products, and the effects they have on the human body overall. The products were rushed so quickly into production that there's no other way to view the drugs and how they've been pushed other than being a pure profit motive for Big Pharma.
When the number 1 contributor to the WHO is the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation you can no longer deny that science about covid drugs doesn't favour those who fund them and who openly want to use them to cause mass genocide. The WHO is mostly funded/supported by private industry NOT the actual member countries of the UN, and is openly trying to push through two major legal tranches that will, for example, extinguish article 3 of the WHO charter.
When the number 1 contributor to the WHO is the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation you can no longer deny that science about covid drugs doesn't favour those who fund them and who openly want to use them to cause mass genocide. The WHO is mostly funded/supported by private industry NOT the actual member countries of the UN, and is openly trying to push through two major legal tranches that will, for example, extinguish article 3 of the WHO charter.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@butterflybaby75 Nicely put.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
Livingwell · 61-69, M
The Epoch Times is a well known right wing conspiracy site. It has a viewer rating of 2.8 and has a number of complaints for subscribing without request or permission. It's worse than ONAN and is associated with Falun Gong, a radical Chinese group. Great source for factual data!! Note that no sources are provided for any claims. 🤣🤣🤣
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Epoch_Times
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Epoch_Times
View 3 more replies »
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Livingwell What "facts" am I supposed to prove? That the founder of Wikipedia now speaks out against it for the very reasons I mentioned?
Feel free to source this somewhere else if you are too good to take the New York Post's word.
[quote]Wikipedia is also a crowd sourced site where anyone can correct misinformation.[/quote]
It is and when the crowd believes something, whether it is true or not, that's what goes in there. Doesn't mean its accurate.
Popularity is not truth.
Feel free to source this somewhere else if you are too good to take the New York Post's word.
[quote]Wikipedia is also a crowd sourced site where anyone can correct misinformation.[/quote]
It is and when the crowd believes something, whether it is true or not, that's what goes in there. Doesn't mean its accurate.
Popularity is not truth.
Livingwell · 61-69, M
@SumKindaMunster I give up. You nuts still believe the election was stolen after all of Trumps lawyers pleaded guilty of lying and propagating lies to the public. Jail isn't proof enough. And now we have a speaker that is guilty of treason.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Livingwell You do that. I have no idea what you are talking about now. The subject was Wikipedia and it seems you are spewing about Trump.
TDS.
![]()
TDS.
PhilDeep · 51-55, M
Don't Pfizer have a long, documented history that was conveniently shoved under the carpet supposedly to save lives quickly?
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 41-45, MVIP
they didnt want anybody to see it for 75 years.
Nuremberg 2.0
Nuremberg 2.0
Guardian · 56-60, M
L.o.v.e.l.y.! F@#%