This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies 禄
Livingwell 路 61-69, M
The Epoch Times is a well known right wing conspiracy site. It has a viewer rating of 2.8 and has a number of complaints for subscribing without request or permission. It's worse than ONAN and is associated with Falun Gong, a radical Chinese group. Great source for factual data!! Note that no sources are provided for any claims. 馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Epoch_Times
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Epoch_Times
WalterF 路 70-79, M
@Livingwell Ha ha ha! You are of those who rely on the lying "fact-checkers" for ALL your info! So sad!
So, having done as your mind-controllers have instructed you and "cancelled" the reporting site, maybe you could now consider the information given. From Health Canada. (Quick, run to your propagandist to see if they think Health Canada could maybe just be reliable?)
So, having done as your mind-controllers have instructed you and "cancelled" the reporting site, maybe you could now consider the information given. From Health Canada. (Quick, run to your propagandist to see if they think Health Canada could maybe just be reliable?)
SumKindaMunster 路 51-55, M
@Livingwell Wikipedia is a hive of left wing political obsessions and is no longer credible when it comes to divisive political issues. Don't take my word for it, ask the founder of Wikipedia.
https://nypost.com/2021/07/16/wikipedia-co-founder-says-site-is-now-propaganda-for-left-leaning-establishment/
https://nypost.com/2021/07/16/wikipedia-co-founder-says-site-is-now-propaganda-for-left-leaning-establishment/
Livingwell 路 61-69, M
@SumKindaMunster The NYPost is a right wing paper. I'm a Republican and even I can see the BS. Show me a AMA article proving your so-called facts. Wikipedia is also a crowd sourced site where anyone can correct misinformation. Are you saying Republicans don't use Wiki? It seems people use whatever supports their position.
SumKindaMunster 路 51-55, M
@Livingwell What "facts" am I supposed to prove? That the founder of Wikipedia now speaks out against it for the very reasons I mentioned?
Feel free to source this somewhere else if you are too good to take the New York Post's word.
[quote]Wikipedia is also a crowd sourced site where anyone can correct misinformation.[/quote]
It is and when the crowd believes something, whether it is true or not, that's what goes in there. Doesn't mean its accurate.
Popularity is not truth.
Feel free to source this somewhere else if you are too good to take the New York Post's word.
[quote]Wikipedia is also a crowd sourced site where anyone can correct misinformation.[/quote]
It is and when the crowd believes something, whether it is true or not, that's what goes in there. Doesn't mean its accurate.
Popularity is not truth.
Livingwell 路 61-69, M
@SumKindaMunster I give up. You nuts still believe the election was stolen after all of Trumps lawyers pleaded guilty of lying and propagating lies to the public. Jail isn't proof enough. And now we have a speaker that is guilty of treason.
SumKindaMunster 路 51-55, M
@Livingwell You do that. I have no idea what you are talking about now. The subject was Wikipedia and it seems you are spewing about Trump.
TDS.
![]()
TDS.
