They cheated for Oxycontin... Why wouldn't they do it for the covid injectables?

Check out the "Dopesick" series - it tells all.

The Publicis Groupe, one of the world’s largest PR firms, recently agreed to pay a $350 million settlement over claims that its false and misleading marketing of opioids contributed to the lethal opioid epidemic in the U.S.

Accusations against Publicis Health, Purdue’s PR firm, included creating the marketing materials that convinced doctors to overprescribe OxyContin, placing illegal advertisements for OxyContin in the electronic medical records of patients, creating training materials for sales reps on how to combat doctor’s objections to the drugs, developing strategies to counter opioid guidelines issued by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and creating marketing strategies to “humanize” the OxyContin brand and counter negative press about addiction risks

The $350 million settlement will be divided among 50 states, with the highest settlement amounts being allocated to California, Florida and Texas. Publicis does not admit wrongdoing or liability as part of the settlement

Publicis, which is now paying its way out of legal trouble over the false mar keting, is a funder of censorship. Publicis provided seed money to launch NewsGuard, and is officially partnered with NewsGuard “to fight the ‘infodemic’ of misinformation about COVID-19 and its vaccines”

Publicis is also a partner of the World Economic Forum, which is leading the call for a “Great Reset.” In fact, Publicis appears to be coordinating the global effort to suppress information that runs counter to the technocratic narrative about COVID-19, its origin, prevention and treatment[/c]

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@WalterF as long as you call it that, your opinion, and don't call it facts! Look at the trajectory of the deaths and what slowed it down to an almost comparative trickle.

WalterF · 70-79, M

@samueltyler2 I gave the facts in my previous comment (the one on cut corners, with simple bullet points).

These facts lead to a conclusion, in other words, an opinion. Mine is of malpractice, of criminal proportions.

I don't want to open the question of covid deaths and vaccine deaths, because all the negative data on those are hidden from the view of the googler, and the media follower. It's so upsetting that the work and conclusions of so many highly qualified scientists has been completely ignored and "cancelled," just because they - legitimately - challenged The Narrative.

This one-sided approach makes a total mockery of the whole concept of science. "The science is settled" - really?

So I will not be discussing deaths.

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

@WalterF I find myself needing to counter some of your comments. There is no doubt among scientists that there was an emergence of a novel virus, the COVID-19 virus. There is uniform consensus that it caused many millions of deaths worldwide. There is also consensus that the rapid development of a vaccine saved many millions of more lives. There is increasing evidence of the long-term effects of the virus on the brains and hearts of effected individuals. The data on children is becoming more and more obvious, over 10% of children who were hospitalized because of their covid infections now have been found to have structural brain injuries. You may not agree, and I suppose you are entitled to your opinion, you just are outside of the opinion of the vast majority of scientists involved in the pandemic.