Yes, but it would depend on a number of things. Do they need a job or they are self supportive. Are they unemployed because they are lazy, or are currently looking and other factors.
I did but there were a lot of red flags I should have paid attention to. That relationship cost me a lot, not only financially but emotionally. If I knew then what I know now, I would never have dated him. Would I date another? That very much depended upon their situation and whether there were any red flags. If he could not support himself, then most likely no.
Yeah, I mean, that alone wouldn’t stop me. There could potentially be things that have led to unemployment or things that could come from unemployment that I wouldn’t be ok with. But unemployment in itself doesn’t bother me.
@Jeephikelove What if he just needed a place to stay "for a couple days", food to eat, wanted to hog the computer, the TV, borrow your car, have access to your bank account, get in fights with your neighbors, stink up the house with 420, cuss out your preacher, and bring other women over to the house while you were at work? AND wanted you to pick up after him?
And then you introduce him as your fiance to friends and family. Just imagine the looks on their faces. 🥰
/Leggs is wondering if Jeep is investigating the unlicensed carry laws in her state as to dissuade such men from coming around.
A person who is unemployed, yes. As long as she can legally buy what she needs or wants and she's unemployed because of an injury, early retirement, or taking a break from working. A person can be unemployed, but still have money.
Men who anticipate financial support from their working-class partners should seriously reconsider their dating expectations and reflect upon their behavior.
SW-User
Employment situations change.. I do have other criteria for dating that are more important than work situation.