This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultAnxious
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Seems that federal cuts “to balance the federal budget” are always to blue states.

The states that pay the most in taxes and have the most people always get the most extreme budget cuts. Usually those same states are blue dominant states.
Whatever, the point is cuts to military spending would more than cover the federal dollars “saved” cutting citizen benefits at the state level. Spending and wasting trillions overseas on war or “saving” billions cutting citizens programs at home? Cuts at home increase crime, unemployment, and poverty in mostly democratic states whom pay the most in taxes already.
W-T-F!
Top | New | Old
ron122 · 41-45, M
Most of the money given to blue states doesn't make it to the people that need it. The money goes in some evil democrat politician's pocket, or it goes to their elite friends running some fake organization.
ron122 · 41-45, M
@jehova And what's your source for this post?
jehova · 36-40, M
@ron122 reality and years of research while in college the data is readily available based on census data and GDP alone
ron122 · 41-45, M
@jehova So it's just your opinion. Got it.
The USA will just have to accept poverty and disorganization, it's a balkanized country without a welfare system.
Thrust · 56-60, M

 
Post Comment