Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

There are around 30 separatist groups in the US. I had no idea.

From Hawaiians, Alaskans and Puerto Ricans who want to be independent, to Native American groups, to individual states that want to go it alone.

While the US likes to tell people it’s all about liberty and freedom, I can’t see them giving up land lightly.

Which group do you think we should get behind, if any?
KingofBones1 · 46-50, M
As a proud Cree. I think I can answer that question. However most native Americans are also proud to be American. And while we do not look kindly upon the government we do staunchly support this country. Just wanted to throw that out there
Neoerectus · M
Is it Separatism when you were already established and are violently incorporated into another political system?

Or is it Restorationist? ie Hawaian Kingdom was overthrown by wealthy and 'religious' North Americans who had take Hawaiian lands.
If we can figure out how to live with the first peoples, that would be amazing...
Gibbon · 70-79, M
@SomeMichGuy Is it possible. We already took everything away from them?
@Gibbon There is a better respect for their sovereignty now, but I agree.

That's why solving this Gordian knot would be truly...amazing & inspiring.
Convivial · 26-30, F
A land of deep divisions... The question is this... Is the glue that binds you together strong enough
Morvoren · F
Come in Puerto Rico 🇵🇷🙌🏻
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
I have a theory....Historically, these Independence groups form when the mainstream values of the society become unacceptable to the group. They just dont want to be part of what America has become in this case..😷
All of them deserve sovereignty and freedom from colonization.
These groups have been around for years.
Us First Nations Natives, we, like the Hawaiians, Puerto Ricans, and Inuit in Alaska, deserve our lands back.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Castenmas · M
@Gibbon A country held together like is made of glass, and doomed to fail. You couldn’t keep Saigon or Kabul, there’s no reason you could contain separatist patriots.
@Gibbon I'm not passing judgment on him refusing to touch something either boobytrapped or unstable, we had plenty of guys reject orders to do things like climb a ladder into a ceiling attic (great way to get your head blown off). We likely needed more guys to reject stupid, like the time a E7 got it into his head to collect his platoon up and go on litter pickup patrol in Fallujah, in 2007, while the LT. was sleeping and completely unaware his men were leaving the wire, in a area thick with snipers. That would of been a great time to protest.

Only time you gotta follow suicidal orders in a well ordered unit is when it's bounding or traveling overwatch and you are ordered to take a sketchy spot for the overall defence of the unit, or being told to bound forward on a sniper position that is lighting up your unit, etc. Time isn't on your side to do it properly and you are guaranteed a court marshal for refusing, if they don't outright shoot you if someone else is killed.

Otherwise.... if I saw something like a radio in a field and I had my doubts, thinking it was a trap, I'd take my time if time wasn't the issue. But not all leadership is the same. I would be probing it underneath with a stick and looking at it from every angle if I had my doubts. We all get basic training with demining for that reason, but EOD likewise exists. If your son lived refusing a order but the other guy died following orders, most likely the person who ordered it got court marshalled and lost.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment