A lot of people will agree that the cosmos is infinite and eternal, and that by it performing an infinite number of operations it thus guarantees the existence of life on many worlds.
Yet how many people so inclined will also think it plausible that the cosmos could provide an infinite series of lifetimes? If people change during a single lifetime could they reappear in changed form on another world? And how much change would make this idea viable?
I don't want to hear from people believing the amount of creation is finite and constricted to a single space-time point. I'm looking for people who suspect a natural form of afterlife is possible through the concept of parallelism and an understanding of cosmic balances. This is a think tank for intrigued people.
I DO think not only the cosmos, but the universe is omnipotent, and that we do have many expressions of our lives.
Rather than using the term, "afterlife," I prefer to think of it as a [i]continuation[/i] of life, each expression of life having its own, unique characteristics.
@PhoenixPhail I wouldn't liken a universe to being omnipotent because only the cosmos could reasonably provide afterlife.The term afterlife, despite its negative association with magic, is a better term in that it provokes less call for clarification.
I've mentioned my theory on here before. My latest theory regarding God is an embellishment on one I've had for years. Given that all matter is energy it seems to me that we are likely just a dream but what if we are all God? God is just curious about life and since time is a construct it can live each person's life and not interfere with it. Then when that life form is finished it moves on to another. Perhaps it can even multiplex at planck speed of 5.4*10-44 seconds so it can be just about everything at the same time.
The Laws of physic state that energy can not be created nor destroyed, are you implying the same energy in simpatico all throughout existence Or A little piece, here and there from the same sprout? Sounds as if you want to imply the latter and not the former,
The cosmos is expanding. We won't have all the answers we seek in our lifetime. Everything He has made pretty in its time. Even time indefinite He has put in their heart, that mankind may never find out the work that the true God has made from the start to the finish...
@DDonde A queuing problem arises from too little or too much change between the manifestations of self. Too little change incurs excessive wait times and too much change incurs multiple manifestations vying for the same opportunity. Both problems may be likened to space-time violations for the reappearance of any event.
@DDonde There isn't, and this is only because the cosmos is infinite. Imagine there's only one world and you want an exact replica of yourself to reappear. It would never happen. The world would be gone long before that. One world also sinks the idea of eternal existence.
I am not quite sure what you mean by parallelism and cosmic balances. The only possible connection at a distance topic i am really aware of is quantum entanglement. But that would be simultaneous, not one after the other.
@ViciDraco A foundational balance for the cosmos would be creation equaling destruction: this balance between order and disorder where events replacement maintains a 1:1 ratio. Further balances will exist.
Parallelism is cosmic provision of multiples for any known event class. There is never just one grain of sand or star in the sky. Parallelism is general possibility. It doesn't violate specific possibility (uniqueness).
