A lot of people will agree that the cosmos is infinite and eternal, and that by it performing an infinite number of operations it thus guarantees the existence of life on many worlds.
Yet how many people so inclined will also think it plausible that the cosmos could provide an infinite series of lifetimes? If people change during a single lifetime could they reappear in changed form on another world? And how much change would make this idea viable?
I don't want to hear from people believing the amount of creation is finite and constricted to a single space-time point. I'm looking for people who suspect a natural form of afterlife is possible through the concept of parallelism and an understanding of cosmic balances. This is a think tank for intrigued people.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
I DO think not only the cosmos, but the universe is omnipotent, and that we do have many expressions of our lives.
Rather than using the term, "afterlife," I prefer to think of it as a [i]continuation[/i] of life, each expression of life having its own, unique characteristics.
@PhoenixPhail I wouldn't liken a universe to being omnipotent because only the cosmos could reasonably provide afterlife.The term afterlife, despite its negative association with magic, is a better term in that it provokes less call for clarification.
