Top | Newest First | Oldest First
helenS 路 36-40, F
Why meat substitutes? Fruits and weeds and vegetables and mushrooms and noodles and rice and couscous, and so on, are delicious. Olive oil, crusty white bread, salt and pepper. No need to replace meat by a replica.
View 7 more replies 禄
helenS 路 36-40, F
@NodandaWink Yes, 250,000 years ago. Now, where we have that large brain, we can use it and stop eating much meat. Some high quality "organic" meat from time to time is ok, in my opinion.
NodandaWink 路 51-55, M
@helenS That's an avoidance tactic. I was addressing your assertion that love of meat is learned and not a natural impulse. I described one reason why science believes it is wired into our DNA and you changed the argument to be about whether or not we can do something different with that drive. Weak.
Peaches 路 F
No, I don't or won't eat meat substitutes. I do think there are too many cows though. 馃悇 I never realized they had such a bad impact on our environment. I've limited myself from eating red meat.馃ォ
alan20 路 M
@Peaches I had a uncle who was a scientist and used claim there wasn't a clear dividing line between plant and animal life. Apparently there are some marine creatures who could be viewed as either. I'm not a vegetarian ( have been since the age of eight ) for logical reasons but for aesthetic. The idea of eating flesh and blood does not give me an appetite. Its only comparatively recently that environmental issues have provided another reason. Having said that, there is a difference between cutting a chicken's throat (maybe half-cutting as I've seen happen) and pulling a head of lettuce. That's my view; you're more than entitled to yours.
BlueVeins 路 22-25
It'll be dank. I just hope the environmental effects will be less bad than those of meat!
ArishMell 路 70-79, M
To be honest I'd rather the food is what it says, not what it pretends.
I am omnivorous and do not object to vegetarian meals occasionally for variety, but cannot see the point of making something resemble meat so it can be eaten by those who choose not to eat meat!
As far as having to kill animals for meat is concerned, I am not against that in principle. We did evolve as omnivores! My concern is that the animals are looked after properly and killed humanely.
I am omnivorous and do not object to vegetarian meals occasionally for variety, but cannot see the point of making something resemble meat so it can be eaten by those who choose not to eat meat!
As far as having to kill animals for meat is concerned, I am not against that in principle. We did evolve as omnivores! My concern is that the animals are looked after properly and killed humanely.
@ArishMell
[quote]but cannot see the point of making something resemble meat so it can be eaten by those who choose not to eat meat![/quote]
Because meat is [i]gooood[/i]. We love it.
So the point of making something to resemble meat which is [i]not[/i] meat is that we can then enjoy the thing we enjoy without having to take a life in order to do it.
[quote] I am not against that in principle. We did evolve as omnivores![/quote]
Evolution tells us how we developed, not what is moral.
[quote]but cannot see the point of making something resemble meat so it can be eaten by those who choose not to eat meat![/quote]
Because meat is [i]gooood[/i]. We love it.
So the point of making something to resemble meat which is [i]not[/i] meat is that we can then enjoy the thing we enjoy without having to take a life in order to do it.
[quote] I am not against that in principle. We did evolve as omnivores![/quote]
Evolution tells us how we developed, not what is moral.
I am already a vegetarian & dont eat dairy as im sort of allegic to it now. But I'm not vegan like my daughter. I eat some foods with ie milk powder in it.
Piper 路 61-69, F
I am glad that plant-based "meat" products are becoming more [i]mainstream[/i]...yes. There are many reasons why I am, aside from the fact that I used to quite like how the cooked meat of certain animals tasted, before I stopped eating them 30+ years ago.
Johnblackthorn 路 56-60, M
Because I enjoy the taste and texture of dead animals and they are good for me unlike modified cornstarch and other random chemicals.
it's just my personal preference, you are more than welcome to carry on as you are, it would be nice if you could show me the same respect I have shown you.
it's just my personal preference, you are more than welcome to carry on as you are, it would be nice if you could show me the same respect I have shown you.
@Johnblackthorn
So there's a difference between bad for you and not as good for you.
Are these meat substitutes bad for you?
So there's a difference between bad for you and not as good for you.
Are these meat substitutes bad for you?
Johnblackthorn 路 56-60, M
@Pikachu yes there is a difference between not as good for and bad for, as far as I'm aware the meat substitutes are not bad for you as long as you're getting the vitamins not found in plants b12 being one of the most important ones.
Crazywaterspring 路 61-69, M
It is humane and easier on the environment.
alan20 路 M
Exactly!
DudeistPriest 路 M
I tried veggie meat when I tried veganism for about 18 months and I did lose some weight. Tasted ok, nothing special.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
redredred 路 M
BK's Impossible Burger is only slightly different compostionally from kibble. No thanks.
Carazaa 路 F
I am trying hard to eat less meat so this will be good for us and the environment! I'm not sure if my Swedish meatballs will taste just the same though!
JaggedLittlePill 路 46-50, F
No. I don't think this is the answer to all of our problems. I like meat. Real meat. I am a human being ...that means I am a carnivore by nature.
If we could make carnivorous animals herbivores instead of carnivores how do you think that would fare? Should we do it?
If we could make carnivorous animals herbivores instead of carnivores how do you think that would fare? Should we do it?
@JaggedLittlePill
[quote]We aren't taking lives of animals for the sake of it. They are a food source.[/quote]
Well first, that is NOT the only reason we eat animals. It's not just because they are a food source, it's because we like to eat their meat.
Aside from that, that's exactly what i'm talking about here.
If we can produce an alternate, equally as enjoyable food source which does NOT rely on taking life, why wouldn't we embrace that?
[quote]We aren't taking lives of animals for the sake of it. They are a food source.[/quote]
Well first, that is NOT the only reason we eat animals. It's not just because they are a food source, it's because we like to eat their meat.
Aside from that, that's exactly what i'm talking about here.
If we can produce an alternate, equally as enjoyable food source which does NOT rely on taking life, why wouldn't we embrace that?
NodandaWink 路 51-55, M
@Pikachu You still take life from plants. They are living things. I think if people watched plant behavior in time lapse more they would see things differently. You would see that plants are slower so we don't regard them as living and striving to survive. They absolutely do!
I understand a sustainability argument but would say that the problem with the way we raise our meat is grain feeding. If you simply grazed your animals in the field, possibly planted with wild grains and other grasses it creates padturland that is good for our environment.
Creating mono-culture of crops isn't really good either. Another way to adddress sustainability 8s vertical farming. Do away with sprawling farms and grow indoors. A controlled environment needs no pesticides and uses less than 1% of the water. There are so many things thst can be done if you are serious about it.
I understand a sustainability argument but would say that the problem with the way we raise our meat is grain feeding. If you simply grazed your animals in the field, possibly planted with wild grains and other grasses it creates padturland that is good for our environment.
Creating mono-culture of crops isn't really good either. Another way to adddress sustainability 8s vertical farming. Do away with sprawling farms and grow indoors. A controlled environment needs no pesticides and uses less than 1% of the water. There are so many things thst can be done if you are serious about it.
@NodandaWink
Definitely. I was waiting for someone to make this point.
But the fact is that we MUST ingest organic matter in order to survive. So if we've got to eat something alive, it seems that plants are better than animals.
That is of course a value judgement.
Definitely. I was waiting for someone to make this point.
But the fact is that we MUST ingest organic matter in order to survive. So if we've got to eat something alive, it seems that plants are better than animals.
That is of course a value judgement.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
@LvChris
I don't understand what you're saying.
....this is not about [i]fooling[/i] yourself or anyone else. The point is not to convince yourself that you're actually eating an animal.
The point is that you can enjoy the thing you enjoy without taking an animal's life to enjoy it. What do you have against that? What does that have to do with making "grownup" choices?
I don't understand what you're saying.
....this is not about [i]fooling[/i] yourself or anyone else. The point is not to convince yourself that you're actually eating an animal.
The point is that you can enjoy the thing you enjoy without taking an animal's life to enjoy it. What do you have against that? What does that have to do with making "grownup" choices?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
@LvChris
It's not what i have to do. I still eat meat.
It's what i [i]want[/i] to do because it seems incontestably morally superior.
I wish you would answer my questions:
[i][c=#BF0000]What do you have against enjoying what we enjoy about meat without killing an animal?
What does that have to do with making "grownup" choices?[/c][/i]
If you're content to leave the discussion here then so be it.
Seems unsatisfying to me...
It's not what i have to do. I still eat meat.
It's what i [i]want[/i] to do because it seems incontestably morally superior.
I wish you would answer my questions:
[i][c=#BF0000]What do you have against enjoying what we enjoy about meat without killing an animal?
What does that have to do with making "grownup" choices?[/c][/i]
If you're content to leave the discussion here then so be it.
Seems unsatisfying to me...
This message was deleted by its author.
This message was deleted by its author.
ArishMell 路 70-79, M
@Pikachu You could be right about the rate of development.
I remember one of the first, a soya "mince", looked like hardboard sawdust and even when cooked properly, looked like cooked hardboard sawdust and was pretty well tasteless.
I think I certainly try it, if only out of curiosity, but I still prefer my food to be honest, not pretend, whether meat or vegetable.
I remember one of the first, a soya "mince", looked like hardboard sawdust and even when cooked properly, looked like cooked hardboard sawdust and was pretty well tasteless.
I think I certainly try it, if only out of curiosity, but I still prefer my food to be honest, not pretend, whether meat or vegetable.
@ArishMell
[quote] I still prefer my food to be honest[/quote]
I don't get this.
It's not a lie. It is what it is and what it is, is a plant-based substitute which has the taste and texture of meat.
Should it be more important that a food be "honest" than that it should help us stop killing animals to eat their flesh?
[quote] I still prefer my food to be honest[/quote]
I don't get this.
It's not a lie. It is what it is and what it is, is a plant-based substitute which has the taste and texture of meat.
Should it be more important that a food be "honest" than that it should help us stop killing animals to eat their flesh?