Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I can't WAIT until meat-substitutes become the norm rather than the exception, can't you?

We're getting better and better at making delicious, convincing meat-substitutes and these subtitutes are only going to get better and cheaper.
So if you could eat a delicious beyond meat burger or a crispy chicken substitute, if you could enjoy "meat" without having to take life to do it....why wouldn't you?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
JaggedLittlePill · 46-50, F
No. I don't think this is the answer to all of our problems. I like meat. Real meat. I am a human being ...that means I am a carnivore by nature.

If we could make carnivorous animals herbivores instead of carnivores how do you think that would fare? Should we do it?
@JaggedLittlePill

lol well certainly not. I think there will still be racism, sexism and classicism no matter how many meat substitutes we create...
JaggedLittlePill · 46-50, F
@Pikachu Don't be a daft monkey. You are well aware what I meant when I said the answer to all of our problems.(ie. Food related problems and the affect that they have on the environment, our health etc)
@JaggedLittlePill

lol sorry, i actually didn't know to what you were referring there.
Yes, i agree that meat substitutes wouldn't solve all our food related problems. But they might solve the moral problem about taking life to eat when we don't have to...
JaggedLittlePill · 46-50, F
@Pikachu If we were not civilised we would be hunting them and cooking them over an open fire. We aren't taking lives of animals for the sake of it. They are a food source.
JaggedLittlePill · 46-50, F
@Pikachu I mean I am not going to go out and eat dog meat or horse meat...just to clarify! 😂
@JaggedLittlePill

[quote]We aren't taking lives of animals for the sake of it. They are a food source.[/quote]

Well first, that is NOT the only reason we eat animals. It's not just because they are a food source, it's because we like to eat their meat.

Aside from that, that's exactly what i'm talking about here.
If we can produce an alternate, equally as enjoyable food source which does NOT rely on taking life, why wouldn't we embrace that?
NodandaWink · 51-55, M
@Pikachu You still take life from plants. They are living things. I think if people watched plant behavior in time lapse more they would see things differently. You would see that plants are slower so we don't regard them as living and striving to survive. They absolutely do!
I understand a sustainability argument but would say that the problem with the way we raise our meat is grain feeding. If you simply grazed your animals in the field, possibly planted with wild grains and other grasses it creates padturland that is good for our environment.
Creating mono-culture of crops isn't really good either. Another way to adddress sustainability 8s vertical farming. Do away with sprawling farms and grow indoors. A controlled environment needs no pesticides and uses less than 1% of the water. There are so many things thst can be done if you are serious about it.
@NodandaWink

Definitely. I was waiting for someone to make this point.
But the fact is that we MUST ingest organic matter in order to survive. So if we've got to eat something alive, it seems that plants are better than animals.
That is of course a value judgement.