Top | Newest First | Oldest First
ForeverGrowingOld · 22-25, F
What you're describing is welfare. And the answer is no, a lot of people on welfare choose not to work, because they have food on the table and a roof over their head.
But what happens then is that no one moves up. No one works hard to better their life and have their wants as well as their needs, or they choose to indulge their wants instead of focusing on the needs of their family.
The only way to better your life is to work for it. So the correct answer is to choose to work and not rely on the govt.
But what happens then is that no one moves up. No one works hard to better their life and have their wants as well as their needs, or they choose to indulge their wants instead of focusing on the needs of their family.
The only way to better your life is to work for it. So the correct answer is to choose to work and not rely on the govt.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
AmbivalentFriability · 26-30
@ForeverGrowingOld You have no fucking idea what it's like or how hard some people work so they don't have to rely on welfare. There will always be people who abuse the system, and make things harder for those who actually need the help.
And you don't know what puts people in a situation where they need that kind of help.
And you don't know what puts people in a situation where they need that kind of help.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
TheCoolestCat · 31-35, M
i like being on benefits, although im not on the shitty job seekers allowance, i get like £800ish a month in cash and my rent paid on top of that so would i be better off working (if i was able to work) in a low paid job, probably barely better off a few quid at most
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
Depends what you mean by 'Basic needs'.
The problem with working for a living is that you're constantly at the whim of your employer.
Just as our Great Grandparents were ! So in that regard life today is probably just as hard since governments love to court businesses but not people !
Would I work knowing that the 'extra' meant I had more 'choice' in life ?
Absolutely.
The problem with working for a living is that you're constantly at the whim of your employer.
Just as our Great Grandparents were ! So in that regard life today is probably just as hard since governments love to court businesses but not people !
Would I work knowing that the 'extra' meant I had more 'choice' in life ?
Absolutely.
SimplyTracie · 26-30, F
Of course. Maybe not. Could I stay home and raise a family and still get cash? That would be awesome. Or dad could be a stay-at-home dad. Be like the old days when children was raised by a village.
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
[image/video deleted]
SwampFlower · 31-35, F
Yes. I could save so much if I didn't have to spend everything on "basic needs."
SW-User
I think I like to have a little bit more money than basic needs. I'd work part time.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Fungirlmmm · 51-55, F
Of course. Even if it was just volunteer stuff.
PrivatePeeks · 26-30, F
Definitely. I choose work. I like it.
Wolfram · M
Regulation nation has almost made it impossible to become wealthy without breaking one law or another. I wonder if we wouldn’t be better off on the dole. Then we could protest as much as the left does
GunSmoke9 · 56-60, M
Where will this money come from? Not all basic needs are the same.
MatthewTheHamster · 31-35, M
@GunSmoke9 Only a let condition. Where does the $ comes from is not in the picture.
GunSmoke9 · 56-60, M
@MatthewTheHamster It has to be in the picture.