Top | Newest First | Oldest First
PhoenixPhail · M
Absolutely!
AndrewC1993 · 31-35, M
Yes, I believe Nuclear energy can be harnessed and can be sustained it has potential if we just deweaponise. Nuclear weapons should be a thing of the past. Cold War. Until then we'll curb our Carbon emissions and what we need to do to prevent to reverse the effects or soften the effects of Global Warming. We just need to get the whole world to agree and for that we do need the UN.
View 35 more replies »
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This message was deleted by its author.
This message was deleted by its author.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Overwatch6 I read the meme and it states that Marxist indoctrination works in relation to 20 million deaths. I'll ask again, because you seem to be dodging every question......what has Marxism got to do totalitarianism?
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Overwatch6 how come you deleted your responses? Are you now rethinking what you believe? Even if you don't and that's 100% your prerogative it's good to have a different slant on history and politics, don't you think?
goliathtree · 56-60, M
No ... It would make the US more powerful than it is today.
And cause a race to make regular weapons, stunting all world economic activity.
Wars would break out all over.
Right now, the US is the only nation with anti-nuclear weapon assets. Leaving the battlefield completely asymmetric
And cause a race to make regular weapons, stunting all world economic activity.
Wars would break out all over.
Right now, the US is the only nation with anti-nuclear weapon assets. Leaving the battlefield completely asymmetric
softspokenman · M
"Pandora's Box" was opened when the "Atomic Bomb" was created and was dropped on the cities of Hiroshima & Nagasaki Japan to END WW2, an American estimate was that 60,000 to 70,000 people were killed or missing, 140,000 were injured and it was also used as a warning to other countries not to attack the United States, other countries have since then created Nuclear weapons for the same reason, however, some countries today use them as a threat that if we don't get what we want, resources, we will attack you, and more countries developed them to protect themselves from the Countries that use them as a threat. "Nuclear weapons don't kill people, Leaders do."
ButterRobot · 51-55, M
tenente · 100+, M
@YukikoAmagi i thought they were going to reboot the franchise 🤔
Katy03 · 18-21, F
No, assured mutual destruction is the best deterrent going. And ultimately, the crazy countries of the Middle East can be kept in check with the threat of a nuke being dropped on them.
SW-User
NO. 2nd Amendment. I’m keeping my nukes.
SW-User
@Soossie Lol I'm just being sarcastic here.
They were all inbred British rejects. They counted to 17 on their fingers.
I'm sure they did.... @SW-User
donut · 26-30, M
No, use them all. so all human species will disappear. Earth will happy again. No war, no pollution, no noise, trees and green everywhere, no animal killing. No bad things
Dlrannie · 31-35, F
Yes they should be eliminated but being realistic that will never happen as I can't see US or Russia reducing their massive arsenals of them
SW-User
Eliminate from everywhere, then yes. If any country has them, they lose the rights to stop others from having them or speak against it.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@SW-User yeah, total elimination
SW-User
@gol979 Then yes, if it's gone from everywhere, there's no threat from it. Doesn't matter what political nutjobs say.
Bushranger · 70-79, M
The problem is, they can't be invented. As much as I'd like to see them eliminated, there would be nothing stopping a rogue nation building bombs.
Deadcutie · 18-21, F
It would be a nice start in the right direction.. besides, with biological weapons, nuclear seams outdated
Maggimay · 46-50, F
No.
World is over populated by fools. It needs saving too. Humans are a virus on this planet.
World is over populated by fools. It needs saving too. Humans are a virus on this planet.
softspokenman · M
Yes. When Pandora's box was opened all that was left was hope.
Groofydorkgerdo · 56-60, M
Heck ya,
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Platoscave · F
yes
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
MethDozer · M
No.
It's a great idea in theory, but impossible and short sighted in practice. It would never happen and even if it did then you're just waiting for he next person or nation to make a one and when they do have no reason not to use it.
It's one of those sad truths that they are here and aren't going anywhere.
It's a great idea in theory, but impossible and short sighted in practice. It would never happen and even if it did then you're just waiting for he next person or nation to make a one and when they do have no reason not to use it.
It's one of those sad truths that they are here and aren't going anywhere.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@MethDozer so take nuclear weapons away and we will end up with heavy worldwide authoritarian regiemes? To be honest, we are going that way even with the A bombs. Or we have the potential.
I don't agree with your assertions. You are basing human nature at its most barbaric. There's is a different way to be. Anthropology evidences this......we aren't self serving beasts, that is just another bullshit narrative.
And I meant Orwellian like......war is peace etc
I don't agree with your assertions. You are basing human nature at its most barbaric. There's is a different way to be. Anthropology evidences this......we aren't self serving beasts, that is just another bullshit narrative.
And I meant Orwellian like......war is peace etc
MethDozer · M
@gol979 The only time nuclear weapons have been used is when one nation had them.
I'm basing human nature on the nature of life. All life, All lving things seek advantage. as history and anthropology has repeatedly demonstrated.
You are also spin doctoring my words. I never said it would result in an worldwide authoritarian regime. I said for them to not exist anywhere would take one. You can never put technology or weapons back in the box. You would have to erase all knowledge of them.
We are self-serving. As is all.
I'm basing human nature on the nature of life. All life, All lving things seek advantage. as history and anthropology has repeatedly demonstrated.
You are also spin doctoring my words. I never said it would result in an worldwide authoritarian regime. I said for them to not exist anywhere would take one. You can never put technology or weapons back in the box. You would have to erase all knowledge of them.
We are self-serving. As is all.
Platoscave · F
@MethDozer If you look at history the way Chomsky has done you will see how many narrow escapes prevented a nuke from going up SO FAR.