One man in USA kills 18 and injures many today! No one needs an assault weapon ever, So sad that the USA hasn't outlawed assault weapons!

@AngelJade You know you have a pretty weak argument when all you have is irrelevant quibbling over technical jargon.

Even in the infantry you don't use automatic fire for anything but suppressive fire. Not even the army uses automatic fire for actual accurate fire.

So it is a silly distinction that doesn't matter.

And if we want to be technical over firearms a bump stock doesn't turn a semi automatic into a full auto weapon. That would require significant modifications to the firearm.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Yet you didn't bother to find a law that clearly states what a assault weapon is. How would you define it? based on [i][b]how scary a weapon looks?[/b][/i] Even so that is strictly your opinion on the matter.

Oh right, one does not exist.

There is no legal definition therefore[quote][c=BF0000] full auto = assault weapons[/c][/quote]

Anything else is therefore not an assault weapon...just as police are not using assault hand guns either.

@AngelJade Actually the definition is quite clear and has been since the STG-44.

An assault rifle is a select fire combat rifle.

But none of this matters. It is just a bunch of technical bullshit to distract from the actual issues.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow by your fenition just about ant gun is an assault weapon. Rocks are assault weapons

@Patriot96 Try that again in English.

@Patriot96 His profile says he is from Canada, clearly he doesn't care about US rights, plus he is a socialist which is a definition of anti freedom and anti rights.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow You still didn't bother to find a law...what you said is moot. As combat rifles are not sold in the USA to the public.

Nothing wrong with current gun laws here either, especially where I live in rural America with police two hours a way. I'm certainly not going to sit around waiting for help. Since the SCOTUS has ruled on several occasions police have no legal obligation to protect anyone...that it is our own job to do so.

@AngelJade Congratulations! You managed to string together a full sentence in English.

Too bad it is nonsensical drivel.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow if you are going to outlaw something you need to define it. A black rifle thingy doesnt cut it

@AngelJade Lol. You are being deliberately dense and dishonest. So I am not going to waste any more time since you are determined to argue in bad faith.


Sure, you have an entire generation of adults who lived through multiple mass shooting but you don't have a problem. Sure.

Oh and when did shooting up elementary schools become self defense?.....I'll wait.

@Patriot96 I did define it. An assault rifle has had a definition since th STG-44 80 years ago.

So either you can't read (pretty likely from your posts) or you are just being dishonest and stupid on purpose.

@AngelJade And it is also completely meaningless bullshit to be going over jargon because even the infantry has their rifle in semi auto 99% of the time.

Even in the military context if you are not storming a position it is a waste of ammo.

So you are claiming that rifles sold to civilians are not the same because they don't have a feature even the infantry doesn't use if they want to actually hit something.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow I don't, doesn't matter how many people die...could be a 100,000 a year or a million, still not a reason to reduce or take away rights.

Number's are irrelevant when it comes to rights.

Plus I never said shooting up elementary schools was self defense, go ahead try reading better next time...scroll up, its not there.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Says the anti freedom loving Canadian socialist. You will never change my mind, you can just deal with it cause I don't talk to trolls like you who simply want to argue in support of taking away rights.

No amount of deaths from mass shootings is a good reason to reduce or terminate rights...it could be a million people a year, totally fine by me. Especially if your one of the victims, come to the US...visit a liberal city, unarmed...and the world will be a better place with you gone as the next victim.

Your the troll who resorted to insults first...think long and hard about that.

A socialist troll too at that 😂😂😂 and thus you are going to be blocked as I don't chat with trolls, enjoy your life in your mom's basement incel.

@AngelJade Umm. Who says you have a right to murder people? Because that is what you are justifying here.


So doesn't matter if millions die as long as a bunch of incels can have their penis compensators. Got it.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Everyone in the US has the right to own a gun, no one has the right to kill anyone, are you that dense? Oh right...

@AngelJade Noone should have the freedom to hate, freedom to kill, freedom to own a gun! We need to have stronger government who care about kids and will punish hate and the NRA, and gun sellers! They are partially responsible for these murders!

@Carazaa Freedom to hate is legal, that is not a crime. That is protected under the 1st amendment.

[b]YES I HATE YOU[/b]...and that is my right and freedom...[b]deal with it.[/b] I hate anyone who is for taking away the rights of people in the USA...which clearly includes YOU! Keep in mind I don't actually know you or hate you directly, I simply hate people who are for taking away rights in the USA, which you clearly fall into that category.

Guns are legal and always will be unless your advocating for the death of thousands or tens of thousands of people. I thought you were against gun deaths? Such a [c=BF0000][b]hypocrite[/b][/c]...gun deaths bad when a mass shooter but okay for the government to kill thousands to try and disarm and protect the others.

There is millions of people who the only way they are giving up their guns is for the government to attack them, kill them and pull them from their dead hands.

I will die before I ever give mine up, any group of officers showing up...will be a gun battle and my ultimate death...now multiply that by a few million. At least the state and local police will never enforce federal gun laws like that, which means the FBI/ATF will have to hunt us all down and kill us.

Your advocating for far more deaths than a few lives, and worse your advocating the government murder its own citizens...no amount of deaths matters to ensure our rights. A million kids a year could die, don't care...leave us alone. We are doing nothing wrong.

Plus where I live, I have defended myself dozens of times from crimes...the police cannot protect anyone as the Maine example shows, they are [i]100% useless in protecting people.[/i] This is the perfect example of why guns are a right and should be easier to get.

All the time's I've called the police for help, they've always been useless...never protected me. Police are not there for protection but to figure out who did a crime and bring them to justice after the fact.

No one has the freedom to kill, that is[i][b] illegal already[/b][/i]...try enforcing that law first and leave the rest of us alone.

No law can prevent crime, if that is possible then I suggest you fight for a law to prevent all rapes at any cost as top priority.

Rape is a far worse crime than being murdered, I'd rather have been killed...so if you want laws to prevent crime, then pass laws to prevent rape. Not punish people for it...but prevent it.

@AngelJade So sorry that the police didn't help you!

@Carazaa They never have either, even when someone shot my apartment and car when I lived in Las Vegas, they didn't care...enough to even pull the bullets out to try and track down the weapon.

Police might as well not even exist.

Thank you though.