Your feelings about this answer to why DEI doesn't work

"I get it, it comes up in my management and education degrees. Systems create cycles of executive function -and parameters within the habits, understandings etc to serve the premises of those executive functions- to replicate those same systems. Including ideological systems, which become compounded when those ideological systems are created to justify the closed systems of ignorance inherent to the limits of your cognitive systems."

Is it just me, or is this a word salad to obscure meaning. Or am I just dumb?

https://similarworlds.com/identity/5503514-Diversity-Equity-and-Inclusion-The-creation-of-anything-of

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ninalanyon · 61-69, T

I'm not sure that it is:

word salad to obscure meaning.

I think it's just word salad. It's meant to look as though there is meaning.

Therealsteve · 31-35, M

@ninalanyon

He was arguing against me, I was talking about things from my management degree.

JimboSaturn · 56-60, M

@Therealsteve See this. You show a management degree to try to use the fallacy of authority.

Therealsteve · 31-35, M

@JimboSaturn So, when a management job asks for a management degree, are they engaging in a "fallacy" if they hire someone with a degree over someone without? xD

JimboSaturn · 56-60, M

@Therealsteve No not at all. What I'm saying is that if you can't explain it without your academic language, I don't see the utility in you can't explain it in layman's terms. You keep talking about your degree as if that in itself is an argument.

Therealsteve · 31-35, M

@JimboSaturn You just claimed that acknowledging the understanding inherent to someone with a degree is a "fallacy". Wait until every private and national organizations finds out that are all engaged in a delusion, eh?

JimboSaturn · 56-60, M

@Therealsteve No, but using the authority of a degree as a argument in itself is the fallacy of authority.

Therealsteve · 31-35, M

@JimboSaturn If you dispute this, then no wonder you struggle with things.

JimboSaturn · 56-60, M

@Therealsteve More insults. I don't struggle with things. I struggle with your explaination, which you seem not to be able to explain in a way I can understand and then you blame it on my defficiencies.

Therealsteve · 31-35, M

@JimboSaturn Yes, as no one else has had this difficulty. They also don't then also assume intent, accuse of fallacies etc.

JimboSaturn · 56-60, M

@Therealsteve Then re explain it then!

JimboSaturn · 56-60, M

@Therealsteve Then explain it then! Stop insulting and teach

Thinkerbell · 41-45, F

@JimboSaturn

You can't get blood out of a turnip. The point mentioned earlier that physicists can explain quantum mechanics or general relativity in layman's terms was very well taken. Your word-salad interlocutor is an abject phony.