Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Do you think being honest is inherently negative?

Evidently being “too honest” can come off as being negative or rude. I’m a very blunt person, and while I’m not extensively rude the way I speak rubs others the wrong way at times. Ex: I pointed out to a coworker that because our inventory is doubling the work load will be more rigorous. Their response was saying I was being negative.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
Being 'blunt' does not equate to being honest.
Being blunt is an excuse some folk use for expressing an opinion when one wasn't called for.
Being blunt is being rude because it takes nothing into consideration OTHER than that persons 'want' to express themselves in such a way DESPITE the fact (unless you're incredibly socially inept) that you KNOW you shouldn't behave that way.

I get that some folk feel more comfortable presenting themselves this way.
But don't ever use it as an excuse or some kind of 'badge of honour' because you HAVE to know, do it too often and it just pisses EVERYBODY you come into contact with.!
Family. Friends. Colleagues etc.

I've heard this line of excuse/reason endlessly throughout my career.
Like it's some sort of "I have a disorder so I have no responsibility!' reasoning.
lequack · 26-30, F
@Picklebobble2 In the example I gave that was me being “blunt” . I get some people use it as an excuse to be rude, but that’s not how I am. I just state facts about a situation when a topic arises. Even if those facts aren’t what others want to hear. I’m not rude just matter of fact like the example I gave above. Nothing about that was negative just the reality of work load is going to be doubled.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
@lequack Im not disagreeing with you.
And don't take anything I said as some sort of personal attack.
I don't KNOW you !

You may well feel that your response to that particular issue was valid and logical and made perfect sense.

But as I said. Be careful in how far your 'honesty' goes.
Because every time you feel good about it, chances are somebody you're being 'honest' to will end up feeling like sh*t ! BECAUSE of it !

And as I said, if you think this is the way to be, be prepared for it to come back at you in a way that will be because that person will have had to deal with your 'honesty' for a long time !
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
LadyAlera · 31-35, F
Well if you said the statement with a tone of pessimism, like you were displeased with the idea of added rigor, then you do have a negative outlook on the matter. But there's nothing wrong or abnormal about that.

As for rudeness, some truths can be considered rude if not delivered carefully. I actually find bluntness to be comforting and unwinding, to be honest.
lequack · 26-30, F
@LadyAlera My exact words were,” Me and the gm are worried about the workload considering we have issues already with people failing to meet minimum requirements when maintaining the facility, so we’re trying to make sure the team understands how much more work this will be and how to make the transition less abrupt.” I guess I should have also stated that I’m a supervisor, so I have to have these realistic conversations with team members as per my directions by my immediate manager.
LadyAlera · 31-35, F
@lequack Well in that case, I think the way you worded it was just fine. No negativity. It seems rather observational and analytical which are valuable qualities for a supervisor position, or any position for that matter. Without honest criticism, a company can't improve or function successfully and in an organized manner.
I don’t think that’s a big deal. You’re just pointing out that they’ll be more work.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Not really. It's possible to be tactfully honest without sugar coating. Not at all necessary to be a dick to tell someone something straight up.
@lequack same. I'm ridiculously honest, and more tactful than most. A lot of people don't think to be tactful at all and instead go to the old " I'm blunt" bullshitty response and decide to be a jerk. There's always a different way.
lequack · 26-30, F
@DancingStarGoddess I’m more of a I’m going to tell you this because I have to, that doesn’t mean I agree with it, but yeah. And for whatever reason people just always end up being pissy with me instead of at the person that’s giving out orders or causing problems.
@lequack I don't tend to direct it at the person, moreso at the act itself or that facts. But I understand most get upset at the messenger themselves so I totally understand. It's a completely normal human response.
walabby · 70-79, M
Nope. Being honest is telling it like it is. One should not try to be honest for other people. One should be honest for oneself...
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment