This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
YouCanCallMeDan · 41-45, M
It’s designed to make men and women compete against each other, when we should be working together.
EugenieLaBorgia · F
@YouCanCallMeDan Yes! Absolutely - it is by design!!
YouCanCallMeDan · 41-45, M
@EugenieLaBorgia To cause marriages to fail. To promote homosexuality and to reduce population
EugenieLaBorgia · F
@YouCanCallMeDan I find feminism vile in most aspects. These days, there is almost a bitter hatred for men! This is not feminism, at all. There should , also, be a movement 'masculinism'!! Of course, it is very unlikely it will be full of misogynists!!
YouCanCallMeDan · 41-45, M
@EugenieLaBorgia I thought masculinism would be good too. Maybe that’s the direction we are heading. I don’t know. It might be a bit tit for tat though. I’d rather hear that more young people are choosing to get married. Marriage education in schools. Encouraging the two genders to unite rather than compete.
EugenieLaBorgia · F
@YouCanCallMeDan Yes! I am a firm believer in marriage - of opposite sexes, not same sex! I'd rather have that tit for tat because I know that with men it would be humourous rather than acrimonious!
SoggedNapped · 31-35, M
@YouCanCallMeDan I don't think one can promote homosexuality.. It just is.. Sexuality is a broad spectrum.. most folks fall near one end or the other, but lots fall between too.