Top | Newest First | Oldest First
His history at home would certainly be a reason for any responsible parent to try and prevent him from owning a gun.. let alone sponsoring him .
I don't know if it rises to the level of criminal action but he's definitely liable civilly..
He's going to lose everything in court..
I don't know if it rises to the level of criminal action but he's definitely liable civilly..
He's going to lose everything in court..
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@Onestarlitnight As he should, I would feel bad if he truly didn't know but buying your son a gun and then acting stupid like you didn't know when he says he wants to murder people just makes me lack empathy for the guy.
MethDozer · M
Two things here. Twice the police came to this young man's residence for psychotic behavior.
1) his father knowing this still sponsored the little nutjob
2) The fact that uncharged calls do not show on a background check is a serious flaw in the purpose of law enforcement. True for gun sales and true as just a general rule.
The father, gun activists, and authorities will claim there was nothing in his record to show concern. Yet the article shows that there most certainly was.
1) his father knowing this still sponsored the little nutjob
2) The fact that uncharged calls do not show on a background check is a serious flaw in the purpose of law enforcement. True for gun sales and true as just a general rule.
The father, gun activists, and authorities will claim there was nothing in his record to show concern. Yet the article shows that there most certainly was.
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@MethDozer Then they need to have a law where if police are called to any residence charged or not, will get put on your background.
MethDozer · M