Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Matt Powell explains why evolution is false. Truly a shining example of Creationists using science to disprove evolution. [Spirituality & Religion]

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xkj2GYA7txg]
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
Ok i quit watching the second he started confusing evolution with natural selection, since one is a logical probability and the other is a 19th century theory.

I don’t know anything about who he is or what he’s about but it worries me anytime I hear an eloquently put yet illogical argument presented as if it’s evidence of something
Sharon · F
@Picklebobble2 [quote]eloquently put yet illogical argument presented as if it’s evidence of something[/quote]
It is evidence - of the speaker's ignorance of the subject.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
@Pikachu Pray he doesn’t go into politics !
@Picklebobble2

lol harnessing the religious right he could go far...
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
When I watched that I had a hard time deciding whether he was serious or if this was someone on the science side of the debate being sarcastic.

Then in another video he says:
[quote]“if we evolved from African Americans into other Americans, why are there still African Americans?” [/quote]
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sdSyiq8e9Q&t=778s]

It is just so weird that someone who seems to be a functioning adult can say such things with a straight face while not being satirical.

If he is an example of mainstream creationism I don't think we need worry, they send themselves up!
@ninalanyon

It's so hard to tell the difference between someone who is sincerely ignorant and someone who is trolling.
Well he is a good example of dysgenics (de-evolution). He evolved to survive in his niche (creationism). Let's see how long he would survive in a different niche. Like Iran. He is literally an example of its not the strongest that survive but that which is most adapted to its environment. Otherwise he'd be ded.
@canusernamebemyusername

lol nice. Totally apt
Thevy29 · 41-45, M
He didn't explain shit. His claim only one species survived since then is false, He claimed it only de-evolved which is false. All he had was an unhappy chook and a vid clip of a CGI dinosaur.
@Thevy29

Yeah there are a couple issues with his presentation lol
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
Do you understand why Matt Powell shows that evolution is false?
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
@GodSpeed63

[quote]I'm still here and[/quote]

lol Nah. You're gone.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
JaggedLittlePill · 46-50, F
That is NOT what evolutionary theory is.

It does not say "T-rex is now lunch at KFC"


🙄 got damn, these people! 😂
@JaggedLittlePill

lol pretty good, isn't it? And it's mostly people with this level of understanding of evolution that feel confident in rejecting it.
1490wayb · 56-60, M
for all truly interested in this debate, you may find Ravi Zachariah interesting to listen to whether you agree or disagree he is an excellent debater
@1490wayb
I'll be the judge of that!
lol yeah maybe i'll check him out. I have not personally encountered many YEC apologists who actually do a good job debating.
Or at least they're misrepresenting what the science actually says.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@1490wayb [quote]this debate[/quote]

What debate?

Creationists bring nothing to the table... it’s a tutorial on reality, not a debate.

 
Post Comment