Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
Ok i quit watching the second he started confusing evolution with natural selection, since one is a logical probability and the other is a 19th century theory.
I don’t know anything about who he is or what he’s about but it worries me anytime I hear an eloquently put yet illogical argument presented as if it’s evidence of something
I don’t know anything about who he is or what he’s about but it worries me anytime I hear an eloquently put yet illogical argument presented as if it’s evidence of something
View 2 more replies »
Sharon · F
@Picklebobble2 [quote]eloquently put yet illogical argument presented as if it’s evidence of something[/quote]
It is evidence - of the speaker's ignorance of the subject.
It is evidence - of the speaker's ignorance of the subject.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
@Pikachu Pray he doesn’t go into politics !
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
When I watched that I had a hard time deciding whether he was serious or if this was someone on the science side of the debate being sarcastic.
Then in another video he says:
[quote]“if we evolved from African Americans into other Americans, why are there still African Americans?” [/quote]
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sdSyiq8e9Q&t=778s]
It is just so weird that someone who seems to be a functioning adult can say such things with a straight face while not being satirical.
If he is an example of mainstream creationism I don't think we need worry, they send themselves up!
Then in another video he says:
[quote]“if we evolved from African Americans into other Americans, why are there still African Americans?” [/quote]
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sdSyiq8e9Q&t=778s]
It is just so weird that someone who seems to be a functioning adult can say such things with a straight face while not being satirical.
If he is an example of mainstream creationism I don't think we need worry, they send themselves up!
@ninalanyon
It's so hard to tell the difference between someone who is sincerely ignorant and someone who is trolling.
It's so hard to tell the difference between someone who is sincerely ignorant and someone who is trolling.
Well he is a good example of dysgenics (de-evolution). He evolved to survive in his niche (creationism). Let's see how long he would survive in a different niche. Like Iran. He is literally an example of its not the strongest that survive but that which is most adapted to its environment. Otherwise he'd be ded.
Thevy29 · 41-45, M
He didn't explain shit. His claim only one species survived since then is false, He claimed it only de-evolved which is false. All he had was an unhappy chook and a vid clip of a CGI dinosaur.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
Do you understand why Matt Powell shows that evolution is false?
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
JaggedLittlePill · 46-50, F
That is NOT what evolutionary theory is.
It does not say "T-rex is now lunch at KFC"
🙄 got damn, these people! 😂
It does not say "T-rex is now lunch at KFC"
🙄 got damn, these people! 😂
@JaggedLittlePill
lol pretty good, isn't it? And it's mostly people with this level of understanding of evolution that feel confident in rejecting it.
lol pretty good, isn't it? And it's mostly people with this level of understanding of evolution that feel confident in rejecting it.
1490wayb · 56-60, M
for all truly interested in this debate, you may find Ravi Zachariah interesting to listen to whether you agree or disagree he is an excellent debater
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@1490wayb [quote]this debate[/quote]
What debate?
Creationists bring nothing to the table... it’s a tutorial on reality, not a debate.
What debate?
Creationists bring nothing to the table... it’s a tutorial on reality, not a debate.