Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Matt Powell explains why evolution is false. Truly a shining example of Creationists using science to disprove evolution. [Spirituality & Religion]

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xkj2GYA7txg]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
Do you understand why Matt Powell shows that evolution is false?
@GodSpeed63

[quote]Do you understand why Matt Powell shows that evolution is false?
[/quote]
lol i really, really don't. If you think you do then i think you had better explain it.
Go ahead....
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu [quote]i really, really don't. [/quote]

I'm not surprised. The natural man cannot understand the works of God.
@GodSpeed63

lol so you [i]can't [/i]explain why you think Powell showed he was right.
I knew it.😏
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu [quote]so you can't explain why you think Powell showed he was right.
I knew it[/quote]

Try to explain why he's not right and you'll find for yourself seeing that he is right.
@GodSpeed63

He's not right because he misunderstands the meaning of "survival of the fittest".
He's not right because he misrepresents the evolutionary relationship between a T-rex and a chicken.
He's not right because he makes a mess of the analogous morphology.
He's not right because he mistakes the number of proposed descendants.

Shit, that was easy lol.

Can you match me? Try to explain why he's right and you'll see for yourself that he is wrong.😏
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu [quote]He's not right because he misunderstands the meaning of "survival of the fittest".[/quote]

Neither do you.

[quote]He's not right because he misrepresents the evolutionary relationship between a T-rex and a chicken.[/quote]

Neither do you.

[quote]He's not right because he makes a mess of the analogous morphology.[/quote]

You're the one making the mess of the analogous morphology.

[quote]He's not right because he mistakes the number of proposed descendants.[/quote]

You're the one making mistakes here.
@GodSpeed63

lmao😂 Why didn't you just write "Nuh UHHHH!" instead of typing all that out?
Listen little boy, can you match me? Try to explain why he's right.

That was

Shit that was [i]embarrassing [/i]for you....or it would be to anyone with a shred of honesty.
Try again.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu [quote]Shit that was embarrassing for you....or it would be to anyone with a shred of honesty. Try again.[/quote]

Who's embarrassed? You ought to be since you have nothing, little boy.
JohnOinger · 41-45, M
@GodSpeed63

[quote]Who's embarrassed? [/quote]

Well, lil' fella. I asked you to explain how Powell had proven his point which you refused to do, demanding that i explain why he's wrong which i did.
Then i challenged you to make your case...and you responded with "Nuh uhhhh!"

So you, you're embarrassed lol
Put up or shut up, little boy...
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu [quote]Well, lil' fella[/quote]

Nothing again, little fella. You still have two strikes against you. I've already hit my home run in case you've forgotten.
@GodSpeed63

lol oh Godspeed, you do brighten my day😂
However, that was
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
@GodSpeed63

[quote]I'm still here and[/quote]

lol Nah. You're gone.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.