Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
All fossils are transitional. Evolution doesn't stop despite what a book of bronze age Hebrew folk tales says.
View 13 more replies »
NortiusMaximus · M
@GodSpeed63 On the contrary, you've just proven ours. 😆
@GodSpeed63
[quote]Just did.[/quote]
Point of fact: you didn't [i]prove[/i] anything. You asserted that the fossils weren't transitional. Hypothetically, even if you were correct, you still wouldn't have proved it.
Allow me to explain it in terms you can neither fail to understand nor object to:
If you find a dead body with a knife wound and then a trail of bloody footprints leading away which end with a man holding a bloody knife, you may assert that he did not commit the murder but you have not proven that he did not.
Similarly, the trail of evidence points towards transition through the fossil record.
You may assert that the fossils do not demonstrate transition but unless you can explain WHY they do not then you have proven nothing. Savvy?
[quote]Just did.[/quote]
Point of fact: you didn't [i]prove[/i] anything. You asserted that the fossils weren't transitional. Hypothetically, even if you were correct, you still wouldn't have proved it.
Allow me to explain it in terms you can neither fail to understand nor object to:
If you find a dead body with a knife wound and then a trail of bloody footprints leading away which end with a man holding a bloody knife, you may assert that he did not commit the murder but you have not proven that he did not.
Similarly, the trail of evidence points towards transition through the fossil record.
You may assert that the fossils do not demonstrate transition but unless you can explain WHY they do not then you have proven nothing. Savvy?
NortiusMaximus · M
@Pikachu [quote]Allow me to explain it in terms you can neither fail to understand nor object to:[/quote]
I think you're being over optimistic.
I think you're being over optimistic.
SW-User
It seems incontrovertible that humans have not always existed in their current form, that there were earlier “versions”. The creationist narrative is that humans were created in their present form. That does not square with the fossil evidence.
NortiusMaximus · M
@Pikachu Creationist are very fond of saying examples of transitional forms aren't really transitional forms. Of course, they won't give their definition of a transitional form because their house of cards will come crashing down when such an example is presented.
NortiusMaximus · M
@Pikachu I doubt you ever will get a definitive answer from them, for the reason I've given.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
God made all of those skulls over a million years...or something.
NortiusMaximus · M
@Entwistle [quote]He always gets praise for the good things but never blamed for the bad things.[/quote]
Insurance companies attribute bad things to him. Notice how "Acts of God" are invariably bad?
Insurance companies attribute bad things to him. Notice how "Acts of God" are invariably bad?
😕 I DON'T believe I came from a monkeh... I refuse to believe so....🧐
@SW-User 😒 Both fling their poo 😂 i don't want to be compared to that...
NortiusMaximus · M
@SW-User [quote]You evolved from an ape. [/quote]
Apes separated from monkeys about 25 - 30 million years ago and we are a type of ape.
Apes separated from monkeys about 25 - 30 million years ago and we are a type of ape.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
Nope, no transitional forms.
@GodSpeed63
No, because they try and force science to confirm their faith positions rather than honestly follow what the evidence shows.
Now give me your answer. What makes a person a scientist?
No, because they try and force science to confirm their faith positions rather than honestly follow what the evidence shows.
Now give me your answer. What makes a person a scientist?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu [quote]Now give me your answer. What makes a person a scientist?[/quote]
One that has a heart for science and seeks the truth instead of their own glory.
One that has a heart for science and seeks the truth instead of their own glory.
@GodSpeed63
You don't need a heart for science. You need a head😉
And that's why creationists are often poor scientists: they're heart wants their spiritual beliefs to be true and that makes them ignore good science where it doesn't fit.
You don't need a heart for science. You need a head😉
And that's why creationists are often poor scientists: they're heart wants their spiritual beliefs to be true and that makes them ignore good science where it doesn't fit.