Creationists are always asking for transitional fossils showing the progression of a animal's change over time. How about for human evolution? [Spirituality & Religion]

@Crazywaterspring

Technically true but i just don't find that to be a useful idea when dealing with creationists.

@Pikachu Facts will never convince a creationist, they're too fixed on their fantasy. :(

@Crazywaterspring [quote]All fossils are transitional. [/quote]

Prove it.

@GodSpeed63 [quote]Prove it.[/quote]

@Pikachu has already proven it, now it's for you to prove they're not. 😆

@NortiusMaximus [quote]@Pikachu has already proven it[/quote]

You call that collection of sculls proof?

@GodSpeed63 They're infinitely more proof than you've ever manged to offer. I note you can't prove they're not transitional.

@NortiusMaximus [quote] I note you can't prove they're not transitional.[/quote]

Just did.

@GodSpeed63 [quote]Just did.[/quote]
Don't lie, you haven't proven anything.

@NortiusMaximus [quote]Don't lie, you haven't proven anything.[/quote]

No one is more blind than those who will not see the Truth of God.

@NortiusMaximus One can't reason someone out of an idea they accepted emotionally.

@GodSpeed63 [quote]No one is more blind than those who will not see the Truth of God.[/quote]
No one is more deluded than those who think they do.

@redredred [quote]One can't reason someone out of an idea they accepted emotionally.[/quote]
True but one can attempt to prevent them deceiving others.

@NortiusMaximus @redredred [quote]No one is more deluded than those who think they do.[/quote]

You just proved my point, gentlemen.

@GodSpeed63 On the contrary, you've just proven ours. 😆

@GodSpeed63

[quote]Just did.[/quote]

Point of fact: you didn't [i]prove[/i] anything. You asserted that the fossils weren't transitional. Hypothetically, even if you were correct, you still wouldn't have proved it.

Allow me to explain it in terms you can neither fail to understand nor object to:

If you find a dead body with a knife wound and then a trail of bloody footprints leading away which end with a man holding a bloody knife, you may assert that he did not commit the murder but you have not proven that he did not.

Similarly, the trail of evidence points towards transition through the fossil record.
You may assert that the fossils do not demonstrate transition but unless you can explain WHY they do not then you have proven nothing. Savvy?

@Pikachu [quote]Allow me to explain it in terms you can neither fail to understand nor object to:[/quote]
I think you're being over optimistic.