Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The WHO Pandemic Treaty

[b]to be signed next May, will put the whole world under the authority of the WHO.
Your health will become their business. No exceptions for any individual. Do what you're told, or be punished.[/b]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
I have read and heard other informed sources say that such a treaty is simply wishful thinking on the part of the NWO since many countries won't cede their sovereignty to such a corrupt organization. Sadly that can not be said of the willing dubes like Canada, UK, USA etc.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@hippyjoe1955 I can't speak for Canada and America but I don't think the UK would do that, given that loss of sovereignty was one (but not the only) reason for leaving the EU - although by a very narrow vote.

Great Britain is a member of, or signatory to, more than [i]ninety[/i] international organisations and treaties; but although many make rules agreed by all or majorities, these bodies do not try to rule their member-countries in some sort of supra-national way. The treaties are primarily to facilitate international co-operation, trade, security, environmental protection, etc. not create "super-nations".

Though I don't believe the WHO has generated the alleged policy anyway!
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@ArishMell The UK like Canada and the US has a rogue government and by that I don't mean the elected officials. The permanent government is very much globalist in outlook. Funny how you mentioned the EU which was done by referendum. The permanent government has been dragging its feet ever since trying to undue the expressed will of the people. They learned their lesson though. They simply won't allow another referendum.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@hippyjoe1955 stop diverting attention, you have no evidence to show for any of your claims.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@samueltyler2 You deny any evidence that is presented. Read your first comment.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@hippyjoe1955 If by "globalist" you mean accepting you own is not the only nation and you need work with them, then what's the problem?

The European Union always was a problem for Britain. The French President, Charles de Gaulle, knew it would be and opposed Britain joining it.

Prime Minister, Edward Heath deceitfully called the European Economic Union as it was then, the "Common Market" and said it would not cost us our independence (he knew it would and indeed was a European Federalist) and so won a referendum on joining it. The USA - always a rather dubious ally to anyone - was all for that too as it hoped it would mean the UK losing influence in the world to America.

Unfortunately the EEC became the EU and started flooding everyone with vast numbers of Directives (law frameworks) - I have seen estimates as high as 100 000; probably highly exaggerated but certainly far more than what became the UK had created for itself since early-Mediaeval times 1000 years ago. This led to masses of burdensome bureaucracy but the aim is to protect the "Internal Market" while erecting barriers to imports to the [i]bloc[/i]. Those [b]CE[/b] stamps you see on some products mean the goods have come through part of those processes.

It was also very expensive. It hauls in and shuffles around huge amounts of tax-payers' money with no proper accounting and books that would never balance year after year. The European Commission has even been know to fire or transfer auditors who ask too many questions. Germany, France, Italy and Britain were the main bank-rollers. Hence one reason the EU was so determined to make life hard for the UK for wanting to leave, as well as teaching everyone else a lesson.

It also had a strong federalist thread among its leaders, and its proper name is the "European Union of the Cities and Regions" - but the more it tries to become a "nation" the more it becomes resisted. Yet it is infamous for not seeking its citizens' views and even for demanding referenda voting against continued membership be re-run to obtain the "correct" answer. They did not try that with Britain though. The United Kingdom Independence Party, which had members with pro-Europe-with-anti-EU views from all political colours despite sneers in the pro-EU Press of being "Right-wing xenophobes", was just one of quite a number of equivalents around the European nations. Though a few are types I'd certainly not want in Government.

What the future holds for the UK and for the EU is anyone's guess, but if the EU collapses it will be its own fault, and very messy for everyone.

Your country is better off not being in such a [i]bloc[/i], while still being in the UN and its agencies, NATO, ISO, etc., etc.!
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@ArishMell The EU is a huge mistake. Globalism is an even bigger mistake. Canada is a nation that never was. It went from being in the British empire to being an American vassal state without any protest from Canadians. I am not a Canadian nationalist and would love to see it break into its natural components. West of the Hudson Bay being its own country and the little strip of land along the St Laurence being another country.