[b]to be signed next May, will put the whole world under the authority of the WHO. Your health will become their business. No exceptions for any individual. Do what you're told, or be punished.[/b]
Whether the accusation against the WHO is actually true and not anti-WHO/ anti-United Nations anti-public-health propaganda some parts of it are nothing new, nothing that national health services and agencies are not already doing anyway.
It's already doctors who decide what medications to use in any particular case anyway, and doctors and biologists who advise what vaccines precautions to use in epidemics and pandemics.
Public health agencies already analyse waste water to study pathogen spreads; agricultural safety agencies already impose strict rules on farm animals' health, welfare and transport.
The World Health Organisation is a United Nations body so has no real power over national governments, but the UN works by agreement and can advise on policies such governments can adopt and adapt as they need.
You love to campaign against public health but frankly your latest uncited quote does not frighten me, and probably not many others who would rather live than die needlessly. It is true that bypassing safety tests on new medicines would be bad, even dangerous, and doing so for the Covid pandemic was a desperate but necessary gamble in the face of a highly-infectious animal disease new to our species; but I wonder how exaggerated that lot is.
Glitch has already called your quote "conservative propaganda" but that's probably just American party-politics. I agree it's just propaganda but the world is bigger than the USA's or UK's internal politics and matters of public health should be across political partisanship anyway. Arguing over details is one thing, but the aim and general approach should be co-operative both nationally and internationally.
Much of the world has suffered pandemics from the Mediaeval spreads of Black Death onwards, if not much earlier, and will do so again. New diseases will appear, whilst poliomyelitis, tuberculosis, pneumonia, cholera, Covid-SARS-19 and indeed bubonic plague are still with us and will not go away without a great deal of international effort. Harmful pathogens do not understand national boundaries and cultures, but they do love a good party such as provided by the vast numbers of people mingling in public, and travelling readily around the world every day. None of us want that to stop - though the vast number of purely-luxury holiday flights and ship cruises does raise separate, serious environmental questions - but let's at least know and respect the health hazards, risks and precautions.
Such efforts against these serious diseases are being wilfully obstructed by violence including murder in some developing countries; but are also being wilfully undermined in some developed countries by anonymous propaganda like that you show us, in others.
@samueltyler2 Indeed they are, making the campaigns against vaccines even stranger.
You could understand it when first tried, by Edward Jenner in 18C England, against smallpox, using a method told him by an aristocratic lady who had learned of it on her travels in Turkey. (It used cowpox, a much milder illness.) The papers of the time ridiculed it unmercifully, with satirical cartoons depicting cows budding from the vaccinated to try to frighten people into refusing the treatment; but the rather crude inoculation worked!
@samueltyler2 Humility is a good start. Now go do some actual research and stop expecting people to spoon feed you all the time. That is why you got into this trap to begin with. You want someone else to research it for you and you put your trust in the one with the biggest name.
I have read and heard other informed sources say that such a treaty is simply wishful thinking on the part of the NWO since many countries won't cede their sovereignty to such a corrupt organization. Sadly that can not be said of the willing dubes like Canada, UK, USA etc.
@hippyjoe1955 If by "globalist" you mean accepting you own is not the only nation and you need work with them, then what's the problem?
The European Union always was a problem for Britain. The French President, Charles de Gaulle, knew it would be and opposed Britain joining it.
Prime Minister, Edward Heath deceitfully called the European Economic Union as it was then, the "Common Market" and said it would not cost us our independence (he knew it would and indeed was a European Federalist) and so won a referendum on joining it. The USA - always a rather dubious ally to anyone - was all for that too as it hoped it would mean the UK losing influence in the world to America.
Unfortunately the EEC became the EU and started flooding everyone with vast numbers of Directives (law frameworks) - I have seen estimates as high as 100 000; probably highly exaggerated but certainly far more than what became the UK had created for itself since early-Mediaeval times 1000 years ago. This led to masses of burdensome bureaucracy but the aim is to protect the "Internal Market" while erecting barriers to imports to the [i]bloc[/i]. Those [b]CE[/b] stamps you see on some products mean the goods have come through part of those processes.
It was also very expensive. It hauls in and shuffles around huge amounts of tax-payers' money with no proper accounting and books that would never balance year after year. The European Commission has even been know to fire or transfer auditors who ask too many questions. Germany, France, Italy and Britain were the main bank-rollers. Hence one reason the EU was so determined to make life hard for the UK for wanting to leave, as well as teaching everyone else a lesson.
It also had a strong federalist thread among its leaders, and its proper name is the "European Union of the Cities and Regions" - but the more it tries to become a "nation" the more it becomes resisted. Yet it is infamous for not seeking its citizens' views and even for demanding referenda voting against continued membership be re-run to obtain the "correct" answer. They did not try that with Britain though. The United Kingdom Independence Party, which had members with pro-Europe-with-anti-EU views from all political colours despite sneers in the pro-EU Press of being "Right-wing xenophobes", was just one of quite a number of equivalents around the European nations. Though a few are types I'd certainly not want in Government.
What the future holds for the UK and for the EU is anyone's guess, but if the EU collapses it will be its own fault, and very messy for everyone.
Your country is better off not being in such a [i]bloc[/i], while still being in the UN and its agencies, NATO, ISO, etc., etc.!
@ArishMell The EU is a huge mistake. Globalism is an even bigger mistake. Canada is a nation that never was. It went from being in the British empire to being an American vassal state without any protest from Canadians. I am not a Canadian nationalist and would love to see it break into its natural components. West of the Hudson Bay being its own country and the little strip of land along the St Laurence being another country.
Global Takeover Advances to Final Stages https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/09/15/global-takeover-final-stages.aspx?ui=fcfceb4b687842eae60d5bafef39880b592b5a1df11c09ab521f76a0a7176a27&sd=20170113&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20230915&foDate=false&mid=DM1464059&rid=1912345164
@AbbySvenz None of those. They are all heavily subsidised by grants which will continue so long as they keep on narative. You are in grave danger of swallowing the message once too often
[quote] The 32-page draft, also known as the “Zero Draft,” proposes mechanisms to prevent and prepare for future pandemics, while ensuring a better coordinated response and equal access to vaccines, treatments, and diagnostics. The draft, which is a preliminary version to start negotiations, explicitly reaffirms each nation’s sovereign right “in addressing public health matters” and will be discussed for over a year. A first draft is expected by June.[/quote]
