I have been blocked by a skeletal user who posted a thinly veiled portrayal...
...of child pornography.
The user posted this:
No, I will not share the uncensored version.
In the furry fandom, this sort of "artwork" is referred to as cub pornography, and artists who produce it are shamed into retiring. The only persons who enjoy such artwork are suffering from a particular mental disorder.
Update: Clearly, I am in the wrong for taking offense at such content being shared. I shall leave you all to enjoy it.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
With this very badly redacted version you might as well just leave it. I'm sorry you've been blocked but the user will have had their reasons. Now be a big boy and move on.
@LordShadowfire I'm fully aware of the post and did also see your replies to others here, acknowledging she's not a pedo. Why keep up this shit implying differently? Are you that sore of a loser being blocked coz someone having other limits of what they want to listen to in a social community? Move on and stop making yourself more of an ass than already. My best advice.
Why block someone who questions why you uploaded questionable content and refer to that person as a "deranged soyboy"? That would imply that you consider it insane to take offense at content containing or implying minors in a sexually inappropriate context.
The most likely reason why she became angry is that she is utterly revolted by the suggestion that she might even remotely enjoy such content. But she is making herself look worse with her reaction. This is something in which I am a bit of a expert myself.
Are you that sore of a loser being blocked coz someone having other limits of what they want to listen to in a social community?
I originally posted about her because I thought the rest of the community would find it amusing. But as you are all taking the side of the original poster, clearly it is I in the wrong. I should never have questioned the appropriateness of the actions of one so pure and good and perfect.
I shall recuse myself now, never to darken your doorway again.
@CorvusBlackthorne Please, stay at your original account when responding to me on this topic or I'll have to report both of your accounts.
As for your comments...
Why block someone who questions why you uploaded questionable content and refer to that person as a "deranged soyboy"? That would imply that you consider it insane to take offense at content containing or implying minors in a sexually inappropriate context.
The most likely reason why she became angry is that she is utterly revolted by the suggestion that she might even remotely enjoy such content. But she is making herself look worse with her reaction. This is something in which I am a bit of a expert myself.
Maybe they just don't want to engage with you on your accusations, and after having observed your ways on this site knows there's no reasoning with you?
I originally posted about her because I thought the rest of the community would find it amusing. But as you are all taking the side of the original poster, clearly it is I in the wrong. I should never have questioned the appropriateness of the actions of one so pure and good and perfect.
What's the amusing part of your original post, do tell? Your excuses doesn't match your post nor your previous comments within your post, none the matter you replying me from your other account.
@deadgerbil I don't get the amusing part at all. He should defend himself on this, rather than running away, even if just admitting taking it a tad too far with his very poorly redacted screenshot.
@CorvusBlackthorne What my wishes are or aren't is of no relevance for you to reply on my last comment for you on this thread. You must be bored, it's not like you got back to the site after four months hiatus just now. Please take good care, will ya?
@CorvusBlackthorne Restore is one thing, replying to someone within a thread on this post that’s four months old, and your comment next being off target is another thing.
