I have been blocked by a skeletal user who posted a thinly veiled portrayal...
...of child pornography.
The user posted this:
No, I will not share the uncensored version.
In the furry fandom, this sort of "artwork" is referred to as cub pornography, and artists who produce it are shamed into retiring. The only persons who enjoy such artwork are suffering from a particular mental disorder.
Update: Clearly, I am in the wrong for taking offense at such content being shared. I shall leave you all to enjoy it.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
I don’t like that user but how is it child pornography? Educate me so I can report it. Is that cat thing or whatever that is supposed to resemble a baby? Like I seriously can’t tell what’s going on in the picture. If that’s the case, that’s disgusting and I knew that account was a creep
@TurtlePink I do wish I did not have to educate people to this particular threat. There is a certain subset of the furry fandom, of which we have unsuccessfully tried to rid ourselves. These persons produce art of anthropomorphic animal cubs in sexual situations as a form of veiled child pornography. I am certain that the user who posted this image was only doing so out of revulsion to it, but the image is inappropriate, and she became enraged when I informed her thusly.
