I have been blocked by a skeletal user who posted a thinly veiled portrayal...

...of child pornography.

The user posted this:

No, I will not share the uncensored version.

In the furry fandom, this sort of "artwork" is referred to as cub pornography, and artists who produce it are shamed into retiring. The only persons who enjoy such artwork are suffering from a particular mental disorder.

Update: Clearly, I am in the wrong for taking offense at such content being shared. I shall leave you all to enjoy it.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SW-User

I feel like that post is being taken completely out of context.

What is this, a witch hunt?

I want her booty too dude. She wont give it to me. A lot of us are in that boat. Lets just cope like adults and not resort to salt okay?

LordShadowfire · 46-50, M

@SW-User If her intentions were innocent, why did she block me for pointing it out?
https://similarworlds.com/embarrassing/facepalm/4505034-I-will-not-download-free-Manga-again?sort=1

SW-User

@LordShadowfire

Well the way i see it people respond to nonsense like this in one of two ways

Either they try and defend themselves through verbal banter

Or they ignore it entirely. And blocking the people bringing the noise is about the best way to do that id imagine.

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@SW-User The only reason I can imagine for someone choosing to block persons who object to sexual content involving children is that she recognizes that it is indefensible.

SW-User

@CorvusBlackthorne was that a child? It looked like some kind of an animal to me...

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@SW-User I explained in the body of my post. It is cub pornography, a particularly vile subset of furry art. Pedophiles cloak their perversion in ways that one must be trained to see.

Look at the original post: https://similarworlds.com/embarrassing/facepalm/4505034-I-will-not-download-free-Manga-again?sort=1
You can clearly see the intent.

SW-User

@CorvusBlackthorne even if that is true, there isn't enough context here to even draw the conclusion that that was her intention dude

This is kangaroo court...at best.

Come back with something more conclusive and maybe ill change my mind

LordShadowfire · 46-50, M

@SW-User The point is, she blocked me because I didn't like what I saw. Do I necessarily think she's a pedo? No. In fact, I've been told by someone I trust that she definitely is not. I just don't like the fact that this is the hill she wants to die on. This is the point where she starts blocking people and calling them "deranged soyboys".

SW-User

@LordShadowfire okay...and so that makes it okay to try and assassinate her character?

LordShadowfire · 46-50, M

@SW-User Bruh. Read what I said. Read what happened at the post in question. I'm not assassinating anybody.

SW-User

@LordShadowfire i assure you I have read it.

This just doesnt do it for me, man. I know what pedophilia looks like and this just aint it.